Skip to main content
Log in

A network experiment in continuous time: The influence of link costs

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent work on non-cooperative network formation star-shaped networks play an important role. In a particular theoretical model of Bala and Goyal (2000) center-sponsored stars are the only strict Nash networks. In testing this theoretical model, Falk and Kosfeld (2003) do not find experimental evidence that players select the center-sponsored star. Based on a slight modification of Bala and Goyal’s model, we design a network formation experiment in which, depending on link costs, periphery-sponsored stars and the empty network are the only strict Nash networks. We observe that almost all groups not only reach a strict Nash network once but also switch the center player in periphery-sponsored stars several times. The main innovation in our experiment is to use a continuous time framework which we believe to be a more realistic setting to study behavior in network formation situations and which makes coordination on stars much easier than simultaneous strategy adaptation in discrete time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bala, V., & Goyal, S. (2000). A non-cooperative model of network formation. Econometrica, 68(5), 1181—1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninghaus, S. K., & Ehrhart, K.-M. (1998). Time horizon and equilibrium selection in tacit coordination games: experimental results. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 231—248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K.-M., & Keser, C. (1999). Continuous-time strategy selection in linear population games. Experimental Economics, 2, 41—57

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K.-M., & Ott, M. (2005). A network experiment in continuous time: The influence of link costs. SFB504 Discussion Paper Series No. 05-02, University of Mannheim. &http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dsp05-02.pdf

  • Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K.-M., Ott, M., & Vogt, B. (2004). Searching for “stars” — recent experimental results on network formation —. SFB504 Discussion Paper Series No. 04-34, University of Mannheim. &http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dp04-34.pdf

  • Callander, S., & Plott, C. R. (2005). Principles of network development and evolution: an experimental study. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1469—1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmura, T., & Pitz, T. (2006). Successful strategies in repeated minority games. Physica A, 363, 477—480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deck, C., & Johnson, C. (2004). Link bidding in laboratory networks. Review of Economic Design, 8, 359—372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2003). It’s all about connections: evidence on network formation. IEW Working paper No. 146, University of Zürich

  • Friedkin, N. E. (1983). Horizons of observability and limits of informal control in organizations. Social Forces, 62, 54—77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goeree, J. K., Riedl, A., & Ule, A. (2005). In search of stars: network formation among heterogeneous agents. Working paper

  • Goyal, S. (2005). Learning in networks. In G. Demange and M. Wooders (Eds.), Group Formation in Economics; Networks, Clubs and Coalitions, chapter 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting A Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition

  • Jackson, M. O. (2005). A survey of models of network formation: Stability and efficiency. In G. Demange and M. Wooders (eds.), Group Formation in Economics; Networks, Clubs and Coalitions, chapter 4. Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosfeld, M. (2004). Economic networks in the laboratory: A survey. Review of Network Economics, 3, 20—41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, M. (2006). Imperfect monitoring in communication networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 126, 97—119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberschelp, W. (1967). Kombinatorische Anzahlbestimmungen in Relationen. Mathematische Annalen, 174, 53—78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. Yale University Press

  • Rubel, P. G., & Rosman, A. (1978). Your Own Pigs You May Not Eat. The University of Chicago Press

  • Selten, R., Schreckenberg, M., Pitz, T., Chmura, T., & Kube, S. (2006). Commuters route choice behaviour. Games and Economic Behavior. Forthcoming

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siegfried K. Berninghaus.

Additional information

JEL Classification C72 · C92 · D81

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berninghaus, S.K., Ehrhart, KM. & Ott, M. A network experiment in continuous time: The influence of link costs. Exp Econ 9, 237–251 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9125-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9125-1

Keywords

Navigation