Skip to main content
Log in

Components of hybrid vigor in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and their relationship with environment

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) hybrids display commercially useful levels of heterosis for lint yield. Cotton lint yield is primarily a multiplicative product of boll number and lint per boll, both of which can be further dissected into sub-components. Relationships among the yield components are complex where they further interact with the environment. To identify different yield components of hybrid cotton lint yield and their relationship with environment, three cotton varieties, DP51, STV474 and LA887 and, their respective hybrids were evaluated for lint yield components across five environments. Heterosis was observed for lint yield as well as yield components. The relationship between heterosis and mean environmental yield was negative for two hybrid combinations, whereas one hybrid showed increased heterosis from low to high yielding environments. Boll number was the major yield component contributing to lint yield. However, yield components contributing to the change in heterosis from low to high yielding environments were different for the three hybrids. The change in lint yield heterosis across environments was correlated with lint per boll and lint per seed for DP51 × STV474 and LA887 × DP51. Whereas, bolls number and boll retention were the main yield components contributing to higher lint yield heterosis of STV474 × LA887 in low yielding environments. Results also reveal effects of parental entries on lint yield as well as relationship of heterosis and environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer P, Green C (1996) Evaluation of F-2 genotypes of cotton for conservation tillage. Crop Sci 36:655–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourland FM, Watson CE Jr (1990) COTMAP, a technique for evaluating structure and yield of cotton plants. Crop Sci 30:224–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BT, Bowman DT, Weaver DB (2008) Heterotic effects in topcrosses of modern and obsolete cotton cultivars. Crop Sci 48:593–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole CB, Bowman DT, Bourland FM, Caldwell WD, Campbell BT, Fraser DE, Weaver DB (2009) Impact of heterozygosity and heterogeneity on cotton lint yield stability. Crop Sci 49:1577–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culp T, Harrell D (1975) Influence of lint percentage, boll size, and seed size on lint yield of upland cotton with high fiber strength. Crop Sci 15:741–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvick DN (1992) Genetic contributions to advances in yield of US maize. Maydica 37:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlig CF, Lemert RD (1973) Effects of fruit load, temperature, and relative humidity on boll retention of cotton. Crop Sci 13:168–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galal HES, Miller PA, Lee JA (1966) Heterosis in relation to development in upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 6:555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DW, Dickens WL, Anderson WD (1969) Functions for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production from irrigation and nitrogen fertilization variables: II. Yield components and quality characteristics. Agron J 61:773–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DW, Miller R, Dickens L (1970) Water stress during flowering of cotton. Calif Agric 24:4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinn G (1974) Abscission of cotton floral buds and bolls as influenced by factors affecting photosynthesis and respiration. Crop Sci 14:291–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guinn G (1985) Fruiting of cotton: III. Nutritional stress and cutout. Crop Sci 25:981–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinn G, Mauney JR (1984) Fruiting of cotton: II. Effects of plant moisture status and active boll load on boll retention. Agron J 76:94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JN, Gutierrez OA, McCarty JC, Wu J (2009) Genetic variance components and genetic effects among eleven diverse upland cotton lines and their F2 hybrids. Euphytica 167:397–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JE, Loden HD (1951) Heterosis and combining ability in upland cotton. Agron J 43:514–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr T (1966) Yield components in cotton and their interrelations with fiber quality. Paper presented at the 18th cotton improvement conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis, pp 276–287

  • Khorgade PW, Stange IV, Mesham LD (2000) Diallel analysis in American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Indian J Agric Res 34:172–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Tollenaar M (2009) Physiological mechanisms underlying heterosis for shade tolerance in maize. Crop Sci 49:1817–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marani A (1967) Heterosis and combining ability in intraspecific and interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Sci 7:519–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marani A (1968) Heterosis and inheritance of quantitative characters in interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Sci 8:299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael BL, Hesketh JD (1982) Field investigations of the response of cotton to water deficits. Fields Crops Res 5:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith WR, Bridge RR (1972) Heterosis and gene action in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 12:304–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller PA, Lee JA (1964) Heterosis and combining ability in varietal top crosses of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 5:646–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT (2004) Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution. Agron J 96:377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Hodges HF, Reddy VR (1992) Temperature effects on cotton fruit retention. Agron J 84:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockton JR, Doneen LD, Walhood VT (1961) Boll shedding and growth of the cotton plant in relation to irrigation frequency. Agron J 53:272–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troyer AF, Wellinb EJ (2009) Heterosis decreasing in hybrids: yield test inbreds. Crop Sci 49:1969–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JH (1953) A study of heterosis in upland cotton: 1. Yield of hybrids compared with varieties. Agron J 45:484–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells R, Meredith WR (1986) Heterosis in upland cotton: 1. Growth and leaf-area partitioning. Crop Sci 26:1119–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells R, Meredith WR, Williford JR (1988) Heterosis in upland cotton: 2. Relationship of leaf-area to plant photosynthesis. Crop Sci 28:522–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley S, Culp TW, Harrell DC (1974) Relative contributions of yield components to lint yield of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Euphytica 23:399–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley S, Ramey HH, Harrell DC, Culp TW (1976) Ontogenetic model of cotton yield. Crop Sci 16:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young E, Murray J (1966) Heterosis and inbreeding depression in diploid and tetraploid cottons. Crop Sci 6:436–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng L, Wu J (2012) Germplasm for genetic improvement of lint yield in Upland cotton: genetic analysis of lint yield with yield components. Euphytica 187:247–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank NCSU Plant Breeding Center and Monsanto Company for providing a PhD assistantship to Priyanka Tyagi. We acknowledge the technical assistance provided by Johnny Denton, Dwight Parrish, Phil Johnson and Blake Bowen for field activities and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasu Kuraparthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tyagi, P., Bowman, D.T., Bourland, F.M. et al. Components of hybrid vigor in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and their relationship with environment. Euphytica 195, 117–127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0987-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0987-y

Keywords

Navigation