Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variability and interrelationships of seed yield and yield components in switchgrass

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on the genetic variability of seed yield and yield components is limited and no information is available on correlations among seed yield and yield components and direct and indirect effects of the yield components on seed yield in switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L. Accordingly, we conducted replicated experiments at Chickasha and Perkins, OK, in 1998 involving 11 lowland type switchgrass populations to assess genetic variation for seed yield and yield components, quantify interrelationships among them, and determine direct and indirect effects of yield components on seed yield through path coefficient analysis to identify traits for indirect selection of seed yield. Significant (P ≤ 0.01) variation existed among the 11 populations over locations for percent seed set and 100-seed weight. Seed yield/plant and the seed yield components panicle number/plant, spikelet number/panicle, and seed number/panicle had significant (P ≤ 0.05) population × location interactions, indicating substantial environmental influence on these traits for these populations. Accordingly, data for these traits were analyzed separately for each location revealing significant (P ≤ 0.01) differences among populations at both locations for each of these traits. Phenotypic correlation between seed yield/plant and seed number/panicle was positive (r = 0.76** at Chickasha and r = 0.72** at Perkins). Path coefficient analyses revealed that seed number/panicle had the highest positive direct effect on seed yield at both locations. Ample genetic variability was present among the switchgrass populations studied to allow breeding improvement of seed yield. Selection for increased seed number/panicle would be the most effective means of indirectly selecting for higher seed yield within this germplasm. Correlation and path coefficient analyses among biomass yield, seed yield, and harvest index indicated that, at least within the switchgrass germplasm studied, it would be possible to breed switchgrass cultivars with enhanced biomass yielding ability and sufficient seed production capability for their commercial propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken GE, Springer TL (1995) Seed size distribution, germination, and emergence of 6 switchgrass cultivars. J Range Manage 48:455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board JE, Kang MS, Harville BG (1997) Path analyses identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late-planted soybean. Crop Sci 37:879–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Boe A (2003) Genetic and environmental effects on seed weight and seed yield in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Boe A (2007) Variation between two switchgrass cultivars for components of vegetative and seed biomass. Crop Sci 47:636–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Boe A, Beck DL (2008) Yield components of biomass in switchgrass. Crop Sci 48:1306–1311. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boe A, Casler MD (2005) Hierarchical analysis of switchgrass morphology. Crop Sci 45:2465–2472. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortnem R, Boe A (1993) Variability for seed weight among and within three switchgrass cultivars In: Faw W (ed) Proceedings of the American Forage and Grassland Council, 29–31 March, 1993. Des Moines. American Forage and Grassland Council, Georgetown, pp 208–211

  • Cicek MS, Chen P, Saghai Maroof MA, Buss GR (2006) Interrelationships among agronomic and seed quality traits in an interspecific soybean recombinant inbred population. Crop Sci 46:1253–1259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobos MJ, Rubio J, Fernandez-Romero MD, Garza R, Moreno MT, Millan T (2007) Genetic analysis of seed size, yield and days to flowering in a chickpea recombinant inbred line population derived from a Kabuli X Desi cross. Ann Appl Biol 151:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das MK, Fuentes RG, Taliaferro CM (2004) Genetic variability and trait relationships in switchgrass. Crop Sci 44:443–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey DR, Lu KH (1959) A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J 51:515–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald CM (1962) In search of yield. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 28:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JC, Bransby DI (1995) Effects of seed size on germination and seedling growth of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass. In: West NE (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international rangeland congress, Salt Lake City, 23–28 July 1995, vol 1. Society for range management, Denver, pp 183–184

  • Henry DS, Taylor TH (1989) Registration of KY 1625 switchgrass germplasm. Crop Sci 29:1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenstein WG, Wright LY (1994) Biomass energy production in the United States: an overview. Biomass Bioenergy 6(3):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins AA, Vogel KP, Moore KJ, Johnson KD, Carlson IT (1995) Genotypic variability and genotype x environment interactions among switchgrass accessions from the midwestern USA. Crop Sci 35:565–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins AA, Taliaferro CM, Murphy CD, Christian D (1996) Chromosome number and nuclear DNA content of several switchgrass populations. Crop Sci 36:1192–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton D, Weatherwax S, Ferrell J (2006) Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: a joint research agenda. A research roadmap resulting from the biomass to biofuels workshop sponsored by US Dept of Energy. December 7–9, 2005, Rockville, p 57 DOE/SC–0095, publication date June 2006. [WWW document] URL: http://genomicsgtl.energy.gov/biofuels/2005workshop/2005low_feedstock.pdf. Accessed on 17 August, 2008

  • Kang MS (1994) Applied quantitative genetics. M.S. Kang Publishers, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassel PC, Mullen RE, Bailey TB (1985) Seed yield response of three switchgrass cultivars for different management practices. Agron J 77:214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone WR (1972) Breeding for seedling vigor. In: Youngner VB, McKell CM (eds) The biology and utilization of grasses. Academic Press, New York, pp 90–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone WR, Cremer CR (1955) The relationship of seed size to seedling vigor in some native grass species. Agron J 47:472–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Reyna JM, Vogel KP (2002) Incompatibility systems in switchgrass. Crop Sci 42:1800–1805

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Reyna JM, Vogel KP, Caha C, Lee DJ (2001) Meiotic stability, chloroplast DNA polymorphisms, and morphological traits of upland × lowland switchgrass reciprocal hybrids. Crop Sci 41:1579–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin SB (1993) New switchgrass biofuels research program for the southeast. In: Proceedings of the annual automative technology development contractors coordinating meeting, Nov. 2–5, 1992, Dearborn, pp 111–115

  • McLaughlin SB, Walsh ME (1998) Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 14:317–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan C, Weiler J (1959) Cytogeography of Panicum virgatum in central North America. Am J Bot 78:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser LE, Vogel KP (1995) Switchgrass, big bluestem and indiangrass. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ (eds) Forages Vol. 1: an introduction to grassland agriculture, 5th edn. Iowa St Univ Press, Ames, pp 409–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell LC, Eberhart SA (1961) Clone and progeny evaluation in the improvement of switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L. Crop Sci 1:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichiporovich, AA (1960) Photosynthesis and theory of obtaining high crop yields. Fifteenth Timirjaze lecture, U.S.S.R. Acad. Sci. (translation and review by J. N. Black & D. J. Watso; Field Crop Abst. 13:169–175)

  • Nielson EL (1944) Analysis of variation in Panicum virgatum. J Agric Res 69:327–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish DJ, Fike JH (2005) The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:423–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters NCB (1985) Competitive effects of Avena fatua L. plants derived from seeds of different weights. Weed Res 25:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter CL Jr (1966) An analysis of variation between upland and lowland switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L., in central Oklahoma. Ecology 47:980–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfearn DD, Moore KJ, Vogel KP, Waller SS, Mitchell RB (1997) Canopy architecture and morphology of switchgrass populations differing in forage yield. Agron J 89:262–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogler GA (1954) Seed size and seedling vigor in crested wheatgrass. Agron J 46:216–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose LW, Das MK, Fuentes RG, Taliaferro CM (2007) Effects of high- vs. low-yield environments on selection for increased biomass yield in switchgrass. Euphytica 156:407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose LW, Das MK, Taliaferro CM (2008) Estimation of genetic variability and heritability for biofuel feedstock yield in several populations of switchgrass. Ann Appl Biol 152:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS online doc, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladden SE, Bransby DI (1992) Genetic variation in morphology, yield and quality of switchgrass. In: Proceedings of the American forage and grassland council, pp 175–178

  • Talbert LE, Timothy DH, Burns JC, Rawlings JO, Moll RH (1983) Estimates of genetic parameters in switchgrass. Crop Sci 23:725–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taliaferro CM (2002). Breeding and selection of new switchgrass varieties for increased biomass production. Oak Ridge national laboratory. [WWW document]. URL http://www.ornl.gov/info/reports/2002/3445605360105.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2008

  • Taliaferro CM, Hopkins AA (1996) Breeding characteristics and improvement potentials of switchgrass. In: Proceedings of the third liquid fuel conference: liquid fuels and industrial products from renewable resources. Nashville, 15–17 Sept. 1996, pp 2–9

  • Taliaferro CM, Hopkins AA, Anderson MP, Anderson JA (1996) Breeding and genetic studies in bermudagrass and switchgrass. In: Proceedings of the 52nd southern pasture & forage crop improvement conference, Oklahoma City, March 30–April 2, 1996, pp 41–52

  • Vogel KP (2000) Improving warm-season forage grasses using selection, breeding, and biotechnology. In: Moore KJ, Anderson BE (eds) Native warm-season grasses: research trends and issues., vol 30. CSSA Spec. Publ., Madison, WI, pp 83–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu YQ, Taliaferro CM, Martin DL, Goad CL, Anderson JA (2006) Genetic variability and relationships for seed yield and its components in Chinese Cynodon accessions. Field Crops Res 98:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Gary Williams, Sharon Williams and Rose Edwards for technical assistance. Research support was provided by the Biofuels Feedstock Development Program, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Modan K. Das.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, M.K., Taliaferro, C.M. Genetic variability and interrelationships of seed yield and yield components in switchgrass. Euphytica 167, 95–105 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9866-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9866-3

Keywords

Navigation