Abstract
Leaf shape is an important factor affecting canopy structure, photosynthetic characteristics, and yield. Introducing okra leaf shape is considered an important strategy in cotton heterosis breeding. The objective of the study was to evaluate the heterosis in okra leaf cotton hybrid F1s, which were developed by crossing two sterile near isolines and three restorer near isolines. A normal leaf check hybrid F1, Zhongza 29, and four newly developed okra leaf oriented hybrid F1s, including the super-okra (severely cleft and narrowly lobed leaf), okra (deeply cleft and narrowly lobed leaf), semi-okra (intermediate leaf lobe), and sub-okra (large leaf lobe) hybrids were selected in this experiment. Okra leaf oriented cotton hybrids significantly reduced leaf area index (LAI) (P < 0.0001), thus more light penetrated into the lower canopy. The LAIs for the super-okra and okra hybrids, however, were too small to supply adequate photosynthate, thus resulting in early maturity, short boll filling period, and low yield. As the LAI increases, the semi-okra and sub-okra hybrids showed certain heterosis. The semi-okra hybrid showed 7–12% heterosis over the check hybrid in lint percent, 6–11% in boll weight, 2–147% in canopy light intensity, 1–10% in net photosynthetic rate (Pn), and −3 to 3% in lint yield. As well, all tested okra leaf hybrids improved fiber quality such as micronaire compared with the normal leaf check hybrid. The results suggested that adopting okra leaf parental lines in cotton breeding provided potentials in increasing fiber quality with comparable lint yield.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- HOCH:
-
Heterosis over a check hybrid
- LAI:
-
Leaf area index
- Pn:
-
Net photosynthetic rate
References
Andries JA, Jones JE, Sloane LW, Marshall JG (1969) Effects of okra leaf shape on boll rot, yield and other important characters of upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 9:705–710
Ashley DA (1972) 14C labelled photosynthate translocation and utilization in cotton plants. Crop Sci 12:69–74
Basu AK (1996) Current genetic research in cotton in India. Genetica 97:279–290. doi:10.1007/BF00055314
Bednarz CW, van Iersel MW (2001) Temperature response of whole-plant CO2 exchange rates of four upland cotton cultivars differing in leaf shape and leaf pubescence. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:2485–2501. doi:10.1081/CSS-120000386
Bednarz CW, Shurley WD, Anthony WS, Nichols RL (2005) Yield, quality, and profitability of cotton produced at varying plant densities. Agron J 97:235–240
Bhatt JG, Rao MRK (1980) Heterosis in growth and photosynthetic rate in hybrids of cotton. Euphytica 30:129–133. doi:10.1007/BF00033668
Chen XS, Di JC, Xu NY, Liu JG, Xiao SH (2003) Analysis on the insect-resistibility and economic traits of hybrid F1S originated from parents both with Bt genes. Cotton Sci 15:284–287
Chen ZH, Wu FB, Wang XD, Zhang GP (2005) Heterosis in CMS hybrids of cotton for photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Euphytica 144:353–361. doi:10.1007/s10681-005-8188-y
Dong HZ, Li WJ, Tang W, Li ZH, Zhang DM (2006a) Effects of genotypes and plant density on yield, yield components and photosynthesis in Bt transgenic cotton. J Agron Crop Sci 192:132–139. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00196.x
Dong J, Wu F, Jin Z, Huang Y (2006b) Heterosis for yield and some physiological traits in hybrid cotton Cikangza 1. Euphytica 151:71–77. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9129-0
Dong HZ, Li WJ, Tang W, Li ZH, Zhang DM (2007) Heterosis in yield, endotoxin expression and some physiological parameters in Bt transgenic cotton. Plant Breed 126:169–175. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01321.x
Faircloth JC, Edmisten KL, Wells R, Stewart AM (2004) The influence of defoliation timing on yields and quality of two cotton cultivars. Crop Sci 44:165–172
Galanopoulou-Sendouca S, Roupakias D (1999) Performance of cotton F1 hybrids and its relation to the mean yield of advanced bulk generations. Eur J Agron 11:53–62. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00018-0
Hebbar K, Perumal NK, Khadi BM (2007) Photosynthesis and plant growth response of transgenic Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) hybrids under field condition. Photosynthetica 45:254–258. doi:10.1007/s11099-007-0041-1
Heitholt JJ (1993) Cotton boll retention and its relationship to lint yield. Crop Sci 33:486–490
Heitholt JJ, Meredith WR Jr (1998) Yield, flowering, and leaf area index of okra-leaf and normal-leaf cotton isolines. Crop Sci 38:643–648
Hirose T, Bazzaz FA (1998) Trade-off between light- and nitrogen-use efficiency in canopy photosynthesis. Ann Bot (Lond) 82:195–202. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0668
Horrocks RD, Kerby TA, Duxton DR (1978) Carbon source for developing bolls in normal and superokra leaf cotton. New Phytol 80:335–440. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01566.x
Kerby TA, Buxton DR, Matsuda K (1980) Carbon source sink relationships within narrow-row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) canopies. Crop Sci 20:208–213
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
Lu Z, Radin JW, Turcotte EL, Percy R, Zeiger E (1994) High yields in advanced lines of Pima cotton are associated with higher stomatal conductance, reduced leaf area and lower leaf temperature. Physiol Plant 92:266–272. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb05336.x
Meredith WR (1984) Influence of leaf morphology on lint yield on cotton enhancement by the sub okra trait. Crop Sci 24:855–857
Montgomery DC (2005) Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley and Sons Inc, NJ, USA
Pathak RS, Kumar P (1976) A study of heterosis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Theor Appl Genet 47:45–49. doi:10.1007/BF00277404
Pegelow EJ Jr, Buxton DR, Briggs RE, Muramoto H, Gensler WG (1977) Canopy photosynthesis and transpiration of cotton as affected by leaf type. Crop Sci 17:1–4
Pettigrew WT (2004) Cotton genotypic variation in the photosynthetic response to irradiance. Photosynthetica 42:567–571. doi:10.1007/S11099-005-0014-1
Pettigrew WT, Gerik TJ (2007) Cotton leaf photosynthesis and carbon metabolism. Adv Agron 94:209–236. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94005-X
Qiu X, Pei Y, Zhang FX, Tang SG, Liu MZ (1988) Studies on the photosynthetic characteristics of canopy in cotton cultivars (G. Hirsutum L.). Acta Agron Sin 4:315–321
SAS Institute, Inc (1999) SAS 8.0 for Windows and SAS/STAT software and user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
Wang XD, Li YY (2002) Development of transgenic restorer of cytoplasmic male sterility in upland cotton. Sci Agric Sin 35:145–141
Wang XD, Zhu YG, Dutt Y, Ni XY (2004) Development of CMS-based hybrids of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in China. Indian J Agric Sci 74:529–533
Wang XD, Dutt Y, Zhao XQ (2007) Hybrid seed production using cytoplasmic male sterile lines in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Seed Res 35:6–10
Wells R, Meredith WR Jr, Williford JR (1986) Canopy photosynthesis and its relationship to plant productivity in near-isogenic cotton lines differing in leaf morphology. Plant Physiol 82:635–640
Wells R, Meredith WR Jr, Williford JR (1988) Heterosis in upland cotton: II. Relationship of leaf area to plant photosynthesis. Crop Sci 28:522–525
Wu YT, Yin JM, Guo WZ, Zhu XF, Zhang Z (2004) Heterosis performance of yield and fibre quality in F1 and F2 hybrids in upland cotton. Plant Breed 123:285–289. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.00990.x
Acknowledgements
The project was partially funded by the National Basic Research Program of China, and Natural Science Foundation and Science and Technology Research Program of Zhejiang Province, China. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful and constructive reviews of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, W., Liu, K. & Wang, XD. Heterosis in yield, fiber quality, and photosynthesis of okra leaf oriented hybrid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Euphytica 164, 283–291 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9732-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9732-3