Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of drought stress environments for upland rice and maize in central Brazil

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought stresses arise when the combination of rainfall and soil water supply are insufficient to meet the transpiration needs of the crop. In the Cerrado region of Goiás state, Brazil, summer rainfall is typically greater than 1000 mm. However, drought stress can occur during rain-free periods of only 1–3 weeks, since roots are frequently restricted to shallow depths due to Al-induced acidity in deeper soil layers. If these droughts are frequent, then plant breeding programs need to consider how to develop suitable germplasm for the target population of environments (TPE). A crop simulation model was used to determine patterns of drought stress for 12 locations and >30 environments (6 years × 5–6 planting dates) for short and medium duration rice crops (planted in early summer), and for maize grown either as a 1st or 2nd crop in the summer cycle. Regression analysis of the simulations confirmed the greater yield impact in both crops of drought stress (quantified as the ratio of water-limited to potential transpiration) when it occurred around the time of flowering and early grain-filling. For rice, mild mid-season droughts occurred 40–60% of the time in virgin (0.4 m deep for rice or 0.5 m for maize) soils and improved (0.8 m for rice or 1.0 m for maize) soils, with a yield reduction of <30%. More severe reproductive and grain-filling stress (yield reductions of 50% for rice to 90% for maize) occurred less frequently in rice (<30% of time) and 1st maize crop (< 10% of time). The 2nd maize crop experienced the greatest proportion (75–90%) of drought stresses that reduced yield to <50% of potential, with most of these occasions associated with later planting. The rice breeding station (CNPAF) experiences the same pattern of different drought types as for the TPE, and is largely suitable for early-stage selection of adapted germplasm based on yield potential. However, selection for virgin soil types could be augmented by evaluation on some less-improved soils in the slightly drier parts of the TPE region. Similarly, the drought patterns at the maize research station (CNPMS) and the other maize screening locations are better suited to selection of lines for the improved soil types. Development of lines for the 2nd crop and on more virgin (acidic) soils would require more targeted selection at late planting dates in drier sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Affholder F (1997) Empirically modelling the interaction between intensification and climatic risk in semiarid regions. Field Crops Res 52:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome, Italy

  • Asch F, Sow A, Dingkuhn M (1999) Reserve mobilization, dry matter partitioning and specific leaf area in seedlings of African rice cultivars differing in early vigor. Field Crops Res 62:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balbino LC, Bruand A, Brossard M, Guimarães MF (2001) Comportement de la phase argileuse lors de la dessication dans des Ferralsols microagrégés du Brésil: rôle de la microstructure et de la matiére organique. C R Acad Sci Paris II A 332(11):673–680

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ball RA, Purcell LC, Carey SK (2004) Evaluation of solar prediction models in North America. Agron J 96:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron C, Clopes A, Perez P, Muller B, Maraux F (1996) Manuels d’utilisation de SARRAMET 45 p, SARRABIL 35 p et SARRAZON 29 p., CIRAD, Montpellier, France

  • Baron C, Reyniers FN, Clopes A, Forest F (1999) Applications du logiciel SARRA à l’étude de risques climatiques. Agriculture et Développement 24:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron C, Sultan B, Balme M, Sarr B, Traore S, Lebel T, Janicot S, Dingkuhn M (2005) From GCM grid cell to agricultural plot: scale issues affecting modelling of climate impact. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:2095–2108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolanos J, Edmeades GO (1993) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior. Field Crop Res 31:253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buainain AM, Romeiro AR, Guanziroli C (2003) Agricultura familiar e o novo mundo rural. Sociologias 10:312–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S (1991) Environment of selection and type of germplasm in barley breeding for low-yielding conditions. Euphytica 57:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, Cooper M, Butler DG, Henzell RG (2000a) Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield. Aust J Agric Sci 51:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, Cooper M, Hammer GL, Butler DG (2000b) Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. Aust J Agric Sci 51:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, Hammer GL, Butler DG, Cooper M (2000c) Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III. Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments. Aust J Agric Sci 51:223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, DeLacy IH (1994) Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. TAG Theor Appl Genet 88:561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Stucker RE, DeLacy IH, Harch BD (1997) Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci 37:1168–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz RT, O’Toole JC (1984) Dry land rice response to an irrigation gradient at flowering stage. Agron J 76:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingkuhn M, Baron C, Bonnal V, Maraux F, Sarr B, Sultan B, Clopes A, Forest F (2003) Decision support tools for rainfed crops in the Sahel at the plot and regional scales. In: Struif Bontkes TE, Wopereis MCS (eds) Decision support tools for smallholder agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa––a practical guide. CTA Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 33. FAO, Rome, Italy, 193 pp

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Guidelines to predicting water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 24. FAO, Rome, Italy, 179 pp

  • EMBRAPA (1999) Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos (Rio de Janeiro, RJ) Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Embrapa Produção de Informação, Embrapa Solos, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukai S, Cooper M (2001) Development of drought resistant cultivars for rainfed lowland rice experience from Northeast Thailand and surrounding areas, Proceedings of International Conference on the Impact of Agricultural Research for Development in Southeast Asia CARDI, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 24–26 October 2000, pp 185–194

  • Gadioli JL, Dourado Neto D, Garcia y Garcia A, Basanta MV (2000) Air temperature, maize yield and phenological characterization associated to heat units. Scientia Agricola 57(3):377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2006) Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola. IBGE. (http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/bda/)

  • Jongdee S, Mitchell JH, Fukai S (1997) Modelling approach for estimation of rice yield reduction due to drought in Thailand. In: Fukai S, Cooper M, Salisbury J (eds) Breeding strategies for rainfed lowland rice in droughtprone environments. Proceedings of an International Workshop, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand, 5–8 November 1996, ACIAR Proceedings 77, Canberra, ACT, pp 65–73

  • LADSS (2004) LADSS Version 2.0––Climate Data “Cleaning” Process. http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/LADSS/reference.shtml

  • Lilley JM, Fukai S (1994) Effect of timing and severity of water deficit on four diverse rice cultivars. I. Rooting pattern and soil water extraction. Field Crops Res 37:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manneh B (2004) Genetic, physiological and modelling approaches towards tolerance to salinity and low nitrogen supply in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Wageningen University, Ph.D. Thesis 218 p

  • Martinez CP (1977) Aluminum toxicity studies in rice. Corvallis: Oregon State Univ PhD Thesis 113 p

  • Muchow RC, Cooper M, Hammer GL (1996) Characterizing environmental challenge using models. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 349–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist WE (1991) Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant population. Crit Rev Plant Sci 10:235–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantuwan G, Fukai1 S, Cooper M, Rajatasereekulc S, O’Tooled JC (2002) Yield response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to drought under rainfed lowlands 2. Selection of drought resistant genotypes. Field Crop Res 73:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parentoni SN, Gama EEG, Santos MX, Lopes MA, Alves VMC, Bahia Filho AFC, Vasconcelos CA, Magnavaca R, Pacheco CAP, Meirelles WF, Guimarães PEO (1999) Adaptação de milho a solos ácidos: tolerância a toxidez de alumínio e eficiência no uso de nutrientes no Programa de Pesquisa da EMBRAPA-Milho e Sorgo. In: mémoria 18 Reunion Latinoameriaca del maiz, Sete Lagoas, 22–27/08/1999. EMBRAPA-CNPMS/México-CIMMYT, 684p., 179–202 p

  • Penning de Vries FWT, Jansen DM, Ten Berge HFM, Bakema A (1989) Simulation of ecophysiological processes of growth in several annual crops. PUDOC Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands, p 291

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro B da S, Castro E da M de, Guimarães CM (2006) Sustainability and profitability of aerobic rice production in Brazil. Field Crops Res 97:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT (1987) Vegetation. In: Whitmore TC, Prance GT (eds) Biogeography and quaternary history in tropical America. Oxford, NYC pp 28–45

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Romano MR (2005) Physiological performance of the maize crop with different plants architecture: parameters for growth models. Thesis––Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, USP, São Paulo, Brazil. 100 pp

  • Samba A (1998) Les logiciels Dhc de diagnostic hydrique des cultures. Prévision des rendements du mil en zones soudano-sahéliennes de l’Afrique de l’Ouest. Sécheresse 9(4):281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Samba A, Sarr B, Baron C, Gozé E, Maraux F, Clerget B, Dingkuhn M (2001) La prévision agricole à l’échelle du Sahel. In: Malézieux E, Trébuil G, Jaeger M (eds) Modélisation des agro-écosystèmes et aide à la décision. Cirad and INRA, Montpellier, France, pp 243–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffert RE, Alves VMC, Parentoni SN, Raghthama KG (2000) Genetic control of phosphorus uptake and utilization efficiency in maize and sorghum under marginal soil conditions. In: Ribaut JM, Poland D (eds) Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. A strategic planning workshop held at CIMMYT El Batan, Mexico, 21–25 June 1999. Mexico DF: CIMMYT. Mexico DF

  • Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM (1986) Influence if soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (1999) Radiation use efficiency. Adv Agron 65:215–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan B, Baron C, Dingkuhn M, Janicot S (2005) Agricultural impacts of large-scale variability of the West African monsoon. Agric For Meteorol 128:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tojo-Soler C, Folegatti MV, Faria RT (2001) Identification of the best genetic traits and agronomic practices for cornsowed out of season using the CERES-Maize model. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia Santa Maria 9(2):339–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Vose JM, Sullivan NH, Clinton BD, Bolstad PV (1995) Vertical leaf area distribution, light transmittance, and application of the Beer-Lambert law in four mature hardwood stands in the southern Appalachians. Can J For Res 25:1036–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimise an objective function. J Amer Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams WT (1976) Pattern analysis in agricultural science. Elsivier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would particularly like to thank Dr. Camilo de L. T. Andrade (Embrapa Maize and Sorghum), Sergio Lopes Jr., Msc Silvando C. da Silva (Embrapa Rice & Beans), Andre Amorim and Rosidalva Lopes da Paz (SECTEC/SIMEGO––Secretaria da Agricultura do Estado de Goiás) for providing us with the climate data and the Generation Challenge Programme (CGIAR) for financial support to the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Bryan Heinemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinemann, A.B., Dingkuhn, M., Luquet, D. et al. Characterization of drought stress environments for upland rice and maize in central Brazil. Euphytica 162, 395–410 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9579-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9579-z

Keywords

Navigation