Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic characteristics of water-use related traits in sugar beet

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improved water use efficiency (WUE, the ratio of dry matter produced to water used) can potentially result in yield improvement in water-limited environments. Genetic variation in WUE can be exploited by carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) in C3 species. In order to improve WUE and its associated traits, it is necessary to understand the genetic systems controlling the expression of these traits. A full diallel analysis carried out on five inbred lines selected from a previous field experiment revealed that Δ, WUE and specific leaf weight (SLW, the ratio of leaf dry weight to leaf area) had high narrow-sense heritability (Hn, the ratio of additive variance to phenotypic variance) and were controlled largely by additive gene effects indicating that these traits can be improved by selection in early generations. In contrast, maternal effects had a large influence on phenotypic expressions of total dry matter yield, total water use, chlorophyll content and leaf area suggesting the important role of selection of female parent for improvement of these traits. The parental line R49 was found to be the best general combiner for all of the traits. Genetic variation in SLW was strongly associated with Δ (R =0.49, < 0.01). This implies that SLW could be used as an inexpensive alternative measure for Δ to assess genotypes during the early phases of breeding programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

δ13C:

Carbon isotope composition

Δ:

Carbon isotope discrimination

A n :

Net assimilation rate

DW:

Dry weight

g s :

Stomatal conductance

F′1 :

Reciprocal hybrid

GCA:

General combining ability

G × E:

Genotype by environment interaction

Hb :

Broad-sense heritability

Hn :

Narrow-sense heritability

LA:

Leaf area

MPH:

Mid-parent heterosis

RWC:

Relative water content

SA:

Stress avoidance

SCA:

Specific combining ability

SLW:

Specific leaf weight

TDM:

Total dry matter

TE:

Transpiration efficiency

TWU:

Total water use

VPDB:

Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite

WUE:

Water use efficiency

WUEsl :

Seasonal water use efficiency

References

  • Acevedo E (1993) Potential of carbon isotope discrimination as a selection criterion in barley breeding. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Asay KH, Johnson DA, Palazzo AJ (1998) Parent-progeny relationships for carbon isotope discrimination and related characters in crested wheatgrass. Int J Plant Sci 159:821–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker RJ (1978) Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci 18:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blada I (1999) Diallel crossing in Pinus cembra. III. Analysis of genetic variation at the nursery stage. Silvae Genet 48:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges OL (1987) Diallel analysis of maize resistance to sorghum downy mildew. Crop Sci 27:178–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock MT, Galen C (2005) Drought tolerance in the alpine dandelion, Taraxacum ceratophorum (Asteraceae), its exotic congener T. officinale, and interspecific hybrids under natural and experimental conditions. Am J Bot 92:1311–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wu F, Wang X, Zhang G (2005) Heterosis in CMS hybrids of cotton for photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Euph 144:353–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1977) Quadratic analyses of reciprocal crosses. Biometrics 33:187–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Condon AG, Richards RA (1992) Broad-sense heritability and genotype × environment interaction for carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown wheat. Aust J Agri Res 43:921–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crusio WE (1993) Bi-and multivariate analyses of diallel crosses: a tool for the genetic dissection of neurobehavioral phenotypes. Behav Genet 23:59–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson TE, Ward JK, Ehleringer JR (2004) Temporal scaling of physiological responses from gas exchange to tree rings: a gender-specific study of Acer negundo (Boxelder) growing under different conditions. Func Ecol 18:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanda SS, Sethi GS (1998) Inheritance of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euph 104:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebdon JS, Petrovic AM, Dawson TE (1998). Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency and evapotranspiration in Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Sci 38:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehdaie B, Barnhart D, Waines JG (1993) Genetic analysis of transpiration efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and growth characters in bread wheat. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farshadfar E, Farshadfar M, Sutka J (2001) Combining ability analysis of drought tolerance in wheat over different water regimes. Acta Agron Hung 48:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr WR (1993) Principles of cultivar development, vol. 1. MacMillan Publication Company. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez GCJ (1993) Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kue CG (ed) Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress. AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AB, Ray IM, Berdahl JD, Karn JF (1997) Carbon isotope discrimination, ash and canopy temperature in three wheatgrass species. Crop Sci 37:1573–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1956a) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1956b) A generalised treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity 10:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE, Richards RA, Wright GD, Farquhar GD (1994) Carbon isotope discrimination and plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 12:81–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Ames, Iowa State University

  • Hecker RJ (1991) Effect of sugar beet root size on combining ability of sucrose yield components. J Sugar Beet Res 28:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubick KT, Shorter R, Farquhar GD (1988) Heritability and Genotype × Environment interactions of carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in peanut (Arachis Hypogaea L.). Aust J Plant Physiol 15:799–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim AMH, Quick JS (2001) Genetic control of high temperature tolerance in wheat as measured by membrane thermal stability. Crop Sci 41:1405–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail AM, Hall AE (1993) Inheritance of carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency in cowpea. Crop Sci 33:498–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jassem M, Sliwinska E, Pilarczyk W (2000) Maternal inheritance of sugar concentration. J Sugar Beet Res 37:41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DA, Rumbaugh MD (1995) Genetic variation and inheritance characteristics for carbon isotope discrimination in alfalfa. J Range Manage 48:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidambi SP, Krieg DR, Nguen HT (1990) Parental influences on gas exchange rates in grain sorghum. Euph 50:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Kirkpatrick M (1990) Selection response in traits with maternal inheritance. Genet Res 55:189–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malik TA, Wright D, Virk DS (1999) Inheritance of net photosynthesis and transpiration efficiency in spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L., under drought. Plant Breed 118:93–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masle J, Shin JS, Farguhar GD (1993) Analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism with variation of carbon isotope discrimination among ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Acadmic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Menendez CH, Hall AE (1996) Heritability of carbon isotope discrimination and correlations with harvest index in cowpea. Crop Sci 36:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda Filho JB (1999) Inbreeding depression and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraya MM, Ndirangu CM, Omolo EO (2006) Heterosis and combining ability in diallel crosses involving maize (Zea mays) S1 lines. Aust J Exp Agric 46:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC (1994) Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut. Crop Sci 34:98–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Bloa ML, Clark CJA, Royal A, Jaggard KW, Pidgeon JD (2005) Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet. Field Crops Res 91:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata N, Taguchi K, Tanaka M (2003) Half diallel analysis for yield components and top traits in self fertilised O-type of sugar beet. 1st joint IIRB-ASSBT Congress, San Antonio, pp 243–247

  • Osiru MO, Rubaihayo PR, Opio AF (2001) Inheritance of resistance to tomato bacterial wilt and its implication for potato improvement in Uganda. Afric Crop Sci J 9:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Poehlman JM (1987) Breeding field crops. Van Nostrand Reinhold Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Antonovics J (1981) Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. V. Components of seed yield in the Ribwort plantain Plantago lanceolata L. Evol 35:1069–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read JJ, Asay KH, Johnson DA (1993) Divergent selection for carbon isotope discrimination in crested wheatgrass. Canad J Plant Sci 73:1027–1035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebetzke GJ, Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (2002) Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci 42:739–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebetzke GJ, Botwright TL, Moore CS, Richards RA, Condon AG (2004) Genotypic variation in specific leaf area for genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat. Field Crops Res 88:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebetzke GJ, Richards RA, Condon AG, Farquhar GD (2006) Inheritance of carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euph 150:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz R, Chowdhry MA (2003) Genetic analysis of some economic traits of wheat under drought condition. Asian J Plant Sci 2:790–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach DA, Wulff RD (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:209–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA

  • Smith GA, Hecker RJ, Maag GW, Rasmuson DM (1973) Combining ability and gene action estimates in an eight parent diallel cross of sugar beet. Crop Sci 13:312–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KF, Labuschagne MT (2004) Inheritance of evapotranspiration and transpiration efficiencies in diallel F1 hybrids of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Euph 136:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teulat B, Merah O, This D (2001) Carbon isotope discrimination and productivity in field grown barley genotypes. J Agron Crop Sci 187:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharisen MH, Brick MA, Fisher AG, Ogg AG, Ehleringer JR (1999) Relationships between productivity and carbon isotope discrimination among dry bean lines and F2 progeny. Euph 105:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Kang MS (2003) DIALLEL-SAS: a programme for Griffing’s Diallel methods. In: Kang MS (ed) Handbook of formulas and software for plant geneticists and breeders. The Haworth Reference Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Kang MS, Lamkey KR (2005) DIALLEL-SAS05: a comprehensive program for Griffing’s and Gardner-Eberhart analyses. Agron J 97:1097–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support for this study was provided by the Iranian Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, KWS seeds, Germany, and Broom’s Barn Research Station, Suffolk, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rajabi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajabi, A., Griffiths, H., Ober, E.S. et al. Genetic characteristics of water-use related traits in sugar beet. Euphytica 160, 175–187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9520-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9520-5

Keywords

Navigation