Abstract
Seventy nine genotypes of tomato (15 lines, four testers and their 60 F1 hybrids produced in line × tester fashion) were evaluated under normal (E1) and late planting (E2) conditions in the Department of Vegetable Crops, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, to determine the nature of gene action controlling yield, quality and shelf life characteristics and to identify a few good combiner genotypes which may be used in further breeding programmes to extend the fruit availability period of tomato in North Indian plains. The lines were significantly different from testers for most of the characters thereby justifying the choice of testers. Additive gene action was predominant for days to ripening, total yield per plant, marketable yield per plant, number of fruits per plant, average fruit weight, fruit shape index and lycopene in both the environments, whereas non-additive genetic variance predominated in controlling firmness index, number of locules, pericarp thickness, alcohol insoluble solids (AIS), dry matter, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, TSS:Acid ratio, pH, ascorbic acid and shelf life, under both normal and late planting conditions. The best general combining ability (gca) effects, among females, in respect of yield per plant were shown by Spectrum in E1 and by LT-42 in E2. Among the testers, the best gca values in both the environments were possessed by nor-RM-1 for total yield per plant, marketable yield per plant, number of fruits per plant, dry matter and TSS; by rin-RM-2 for firmness index, pericarp thickness and alcohol insoluble solids; by alc-IIHR-2050 for average fruit weight, number of locules and shelf life and by alc-IIHR-2052 for lycopene. The gca of ripening mutants had a nice consonance with their per se performance for most of the characters indicating that additive gene action was operative in these mutants for majority of the traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AIS:
-
Alcohol insoluble solids
- TSS:
-
Total soluble solids
- gca:
-
General combining ability
References
Anonymous (2003) FAO production yearbook. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, pp 140–142
Anonymous (2005) Package of practices for cultivation of vegetables. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Anonymous (2006a) Agricultutal statistics. http://faostat.fao.org. Cited August 10 2006
Anonymous (2006b) Vegetable seed industry. http://www.seedassociationofindia.com. Cited August 10 2006
Agar IT, Abak K, Yarsi G (1994) Effect of different maturity stages on the keeping quality of nor (non-ripening), rin (ripening-inhibitor) and normal type tomatoes. Acta Hort 368:742–753
Almeida JLF (1961) Um novo aspecto de melhoramento do tomato. Agricultura 10:43–44
AOAC (1975) Official method of analysis. In: Horowitz W (ed) Association of official analytical chemist. AOAC, Washington, DC
Bhatt RP, Biswas VR, Kumar N (2001) Heterosis, combining ability and genetics for vitamin C, total soluble solids and yield in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) at 1,700 m altitude. J Agric Sci 137:71–75
Chadha S, Vidyasagar, Kumar J (2002) Combining ability and gene action studies for some fruit characters in bacterial wilt resistant tomato lines. South Indian Hort 50:65–71
Das ND, Ghosh SS, Chattopadhyay TK (1988) Genetics of quantitative characters in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Indian J Agric Sci 58:64–65
Dhatt AS (2001) Evaluation of F1 hybrids incorporating nor, rin and alc alleles for yield, quality and shelf life of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Ph.D. Dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Dhatt AS, Singh S (2004) Compression meter: a simple device to measure fruit firmness. Indian J Hort 51:183–184
Dhatt AS, Singh S, Dhaliwal MS, Cheema DS (2001) Genetic analysis of tomato hybrids incorporating nor, rin and alc alleles for quality. Crop Improv 28:32–39
Dhillon GS, Nandpuri KS, Gupta VP (1979) Combining ability in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J Res Punjab Agric Univ 16:34–40
Dod VN, Kale PB, Wankhade V (1995) Combing ability for certain quality traits in tomato. Crop Res 9: 407–412
Garg N (2006) Studies on heterosis and combining ability involving ripening mutants in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Ph.D. Dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Georgiev H (1991) Heterosis in tomato breeding. In: Kalloo G (ed) Genetic improvement of tomato. Springer-Verlag Press, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 83–98
Govindarasu P, Muthukrishnan CR, Irulappan I (1981) Combining ability for yield and its components in tomato. Scientia Hort 14:125–130
Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493
Hazra P, Som MG (1999) Technology for vegetable production and improvement. Naya Prokash, Kolkata, India, pp 291–318
Ignatova SI, Garanko IB, Botyaeva GV (1999) The genotype-environment interaction with using genes nor, rin and alc. Acta Hort 487:367–372
Kadam DD, Deore BP, Chaudhary SM (1991) Effects of sowing date and staking on yield of tomato cultivars. Indian J Agric Res 15:103–106
Kalloo G, Singh RK, Bhutani RD (1974) Combining ability studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Theor Appl Genet 44:358–363
Kalloo G, Banerjee MK, Tewari RN, Pachauri DC (2001) Tomato. In: Thamburaj S, Singh N (eds) Textbook of vegetables, tubercrops and spices. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi India, pp 10–29
Kaur P (2000) Studies on the use of male sterile lines for F1 hybrids production in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). M.Sc. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Kempthorne Q (1957) An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, pp 458–471
Kitagawa M, Ito H, Shiina T, Nakamura N, Inakuma T, Kasumi T, Ishiguro Y, Yabe K, Ito Y (2005) Characterization of tomato fruit ripening and analysis of gene expression in F1 hybrids of the ripening inhibitor (rin) mutant. Physiologia Plantarum 123:331–338
Kopeliovitch E, Mizrahi Y, Rabinowitch HD, Kedar N (1980) Physiology of the tomato mutant alcobaca. Physiologia Plantarum 48:307–311
Kopeliovitch E, Rabinowitch HD, Mizrahi Y, Kedar N (1981) Mode of inheritance of alcobaca: a tomato fruit ripening mutant. Euphytica 30:223–225
Kumar TP, Tewari RN, Pachauri DC (1997) Line × tester analysis for processing characters in tomato. Veg Sci 24:34–38
Lonkar SG, Borikar ST (1988) Combining ability studies with positional male sterile lines in tomato. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 13:261–262
Lu CG, Xu HL, Yian RC, Yu WG (1995) Physiological and biochemical characters of the alc, nor and rin ripening mutants in tomato and application in breeding for storage property. Acta Hort 402:141–150
McGlasson WB, Sumeghy JB, Morris LL, McBridge RL, Best DJ, Tigchelaar EC (1983) Yield and evaluation of F1 tomato hybrids incorporating the non-ripening nor gene. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 23:106–112
Mutschler MA (1984) Ripening and storage characteristics of ‘Alcobaca’ ripening mutant in tomato. J Am Soc Hort Sci 109:504–507
Mutschler MA, Wolfe DW, Cobb ED, Yourstone KS (1992) Tomato fruit quality and shelf life in hybrids heterozygous for the alc ripening mutant. Hort Sci. 27:352–355
Nandpuri KS, Singh H, Kumar JC (1971) Effects of planting dates on the performance of tomato cultivars for summer crop. Punjab Hort J 11:87–91
Nguyen VQ, Ashcroft WJ, Jones KJ, McGlasson WB (1991) Evaluation of F1 hybrids incorporating the rin (ripening inhibitor) gene to improve the storage life and fruit quality of fresh market tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Aust J Exp Agric 31:407–413
Peter KV, Rai B (1980) Combining ability analysis in tomato. Indian J Genet 40: 1–7
Peter KV, Sarnaik DA, Ramachandran C (1981) Note on the inheritance of free neck locule number and ovate fruit shape and their linkage estimates in tomato. Indian J Agric Sci 51:191–193
Rao RM, Choudhury B (1974) Inheritance of processing qualities of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Proc XIX Int Hort Cong I Section VIII, Vegetables, p 713
Robinson RW, Tomes ML (1968) Ripening inhibitor: a gene with multiple effects on ripening. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 18:36–37
Rodriguez GE, Carballo CA, Baca CGA, Martinez GA, Rosas RM (2004) Genetic parameters of mean fruit weight and their components of tomato. Acta Hort 637:145–148
Samnotra RK, Gupta AK, Jandial KC (1998) Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) to different dates of transplanting. Environ Ecol 16:740–741
Sharma JR (1998) Statistical and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. New Age International (P) Limited Publishers, New Delhi India, pp 138–152
Simpson DJ, Bagyar MR, McGlasson WB, Lee TH (1976) Changes in ultrastructure and pigments content during development and senescence of fruits of normal, rin and nor mutant tomatoes. Aust J Pl Physiol 3:576–587
Singh AK, Narayan R (2004) Variability studies in tomato under cold arid condition of Ladakh. Hort J 17:67–72
Singh G, Nandpuri KS (1974) Combining ability studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars with functional male sterile line. J Res Punjab Agric Univ 11:26–29
Singh S, Dhaliwal MS, Cheema DS, Brar GS (1998) Diallel analysis of some processing attributes in tomato. J Genet Breed 52:265–269
Sonone AH, Yadav MD, Thombre MV (1986) Combining ability for yield and its components in tomato. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 13:288–290
Sprague GF, Tatum LA (1942) General versus specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J Am Soc Agron 34:923–932
Swamy KRM, Mathai PJ (1982) Note on combining ability in tomato. Indian J Agric Sci 52:193–196
Tigchelaar EC, Tomes ML, Kerr EA, Barman RJ (1973) A new fruit ripening mutant, non-ripening (nor). Rep Tomato Genet Coop 23:33
USDA(1976) United States standards of fresh tomatoes. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Marketing Service, Washington, DC, p 10
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Dr. G.S. Chahal, Dean, College of Agriculture and Dr. A.S. Sidhu, Head, Department of Vegetable Crops, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, for providing the facilities necessary to complete this work in time. The timely help received from our field and laboratory staff is also acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garg, N., Cheema, D.S. & Dhatt, A.S. Genetics of yield, quality and shelf life characteristics in tomato under normal and late planting conditions. Euphytica 159, 275–288 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9486-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9486-3