Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determining indicators, methods and sites for monitoring potential adverse effects of genetically modified plants to the environment: the legal and conceptional framework for implementation

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to Directive 2001/18/EC commercial cultivation of genetically modified plants (GMPs) have to be monitored. The aim of the monitoring is to identify potential adverse effects of the GMPs and their use on human health and the environment. There are few concepts showing how GMP monitoring may be implemented. This article indicates monitoring requirements with a focus on environmental issues. GMP monitoring has to be appropriate to detect direct and indirect, immediate and long-term as well as unforeseen effects. For choosing suitable monitoring indicators and methods, we propose a case-by-case approach, which is hypothesis-driven and related to specified protection targets. We present criteria for selecting suitable monitoring sites and demonstrate possibilities to integrate GMP monitoring with existing environmental monitoring programmes. To ensure comparability, interpretability and quality of GMP monitoring data a harmonisation on both national and international level is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACRE (2004) Guidance on best practice in the design of post-market monitoring plans in submissions to the Advisory Committee on releases to the environment. ACRE Guidance Note 16. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/postmarket/acre_postmarketmonitor-guidance.pdf

  • Andow DA, Hilbeck A (2004) Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic crops. BioScience 54(7):637–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BfR (2007) Official analytical methods for residues of plant protection products and pesticides (L 00.00 15). http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/1637

  • Birch ANE, Geoghean IE, Majerus MEN, McNicol JW, Hackett CA, Gatehouse AMR, Gatehouse JA (1999) Tri-trophic interactions involving pest aphid, predatory 2-spot ladybirds and transgenic potatoes expressing snowdrop lectin for aphid resistance. Mol Breed 5:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler C (2006) Biodiversity monitoring in Switzerland: what can we learn for General Surveillance of GM crops? J Verbr Lebensm 1(Supplement 1):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaux C, Lavigne C, Falentin-Guyomarch H, Vautrin S, Lecomte J, Klein EK (2005) High diversity of oilseed rape pollen clouds over an agro-ecosystem indicates long-distance dispersal. Mol Ecol 14:2269–2280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douville M, Gagné F, Blaise C, André C (2006) Occurence and persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and transgenic Bt corn cry1Ab gene from an aquatic environment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.01.002

  • European Community (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Officinal J Eur Commun 2001/18/EC:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (2002) COUNCIL DECISION of 3 October 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing AnnexVII to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing. Council Directive 90/220/EEC:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (2007) Information on analytical methods for the detection of irradiated foods standardised by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN). http://www.ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/anal_methods_en.htm

  • EFSA (2006) Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified microorganisms and their derived products intended for food and feed use. EFSA J 374:1–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink M, Seitz H, Beismann H (2006) Concepts for General Surveillance: VDI proposals. Standardisation and harmonisation in the field of GMO monitoring. J Verbr Lebensm 1:11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graef F, Stachow U, Werner A Schütte G (2007) Review: agricultural practice changes with cultivating genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape. Agric Syst 94:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graef F, Züghart W, Hommel B, Heinrich U, Stachow U, Werner A (2005) Methodological scheme for designing the monitoring of genetically modified crops at the regional scale. Env Monitor Assess 111(1–3):1–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hails RS (2002) Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices. Nature 418:685–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes C, Haughton AJ, Osborne JL, Roy DB, Clark SJ, Perry JN, Rothery P, Bohan DA, Brooks DR, Champion GT, Dewar AM, Heard MS, Woiwod IP, Daniels RE, Young MW, Parish AM, Scott RJ, Firbank LG, Squire GR (2003) Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the farm scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1899–1913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR, Gregg PC, Cupta VVSR, Jessop R, Lonsdale WM, Sindel B, Stanley J, Williams CK (2004) Identifying hazards in complex ecological systems Part 3: Hierarchical Holographic Model for herbicide tolerant oilseed rape. Environ Biosafety Res 3:109–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann JA, Traavik T (2004) Problems in monitoring horizontal gene transfer in field trials of transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol 22:1105–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lefol E, Fleury A, Darmency H (1996) Gene dispersal from transgenic crops. II. Hybridization between oilseed rape and the wild hoary mustard. Sex Plant Reprod 9:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh RA, Johnston, AE (1994) Long-term experiments in agricultural and ecological sciences. In: Proceedings of a Conference to Celebrate the 150th Anniversary of Rothamsted Experimental Station, Rothamsted, 14–17 July 1993. CAB International, Wallingford, p 428

  • Meier MS, Hilbeck A (2005) Faunistische Indikatoren für das Monitoring der Umweltwirkungen gentechnisch veränderter Organismen (GVO). Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 29:1–137

  • Metzger M, Bunce B, Jongman R, Mücher S, Watkins JW (2005) A climatic stratification of the environment in Europe. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen KM, van Elsas JD, Smalla K (2001) Dynamics, horizontal transfer and selectionof novel DNA in the phytosphere of transgenic plants. Ann Microbiol 51:79–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perry JN, Rothery P, Clark SJ, Heard MS, Hawes C (2003) Design, analysis and statistical power of the farm-scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. J Appl Ecol 40:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2005) The impact of insecticides and herbicides on the biodiversity and productivity of aquatic communities. Ecol Appl 15(2):618–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger MA, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles SB, Roush RT (2002) Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science 296:2386–2388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter H, Verhoeven R, Middelhoff U, Breckling B (2006) Information System for the Monitoring of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) – ISMO –. J Verbr Lebensm 1:89–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanvido O, Widmer F, Winzeler M, Bigler F (2005) A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. Environ Biosafety Res 4:13–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder W, Schmidt G (2001) Defining ecoregions as framework for the assessment of ecological monitoring networks in Germany by means of GIS and classification and regression trees (CART). Gate Environ Health Sci 3:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP (2001) Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. PNAS 98(21):11937–11942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein A, Ettema C (2003) An overview of spatial sampling procedures and experimental design of spatial studies for ecosystem comparisons. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler A, Heissenberger A, Frank G, Lethmayer C, Gaugitsch H (2000) Ökologisches Monitoring gentechnisch veränderter Organismen. Monographien Umweltbundesamt Wien 126:1–240

    Google Scholar 

  • VDI (2006) VDI Guidelines: monitoring the ecological effects of genetically modified organisms. Genetically modified plants. Basic principles and strategies. VDI 4330 (Part 1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson MJ, Davenport IJ, Charters YM, Jones AE, Allainguillaume J, Butler HT, Mason DC, Raybould AF (2000) A direct regional scale estimate of transgene movement from genetically modified oilseed rape to its wild progenitors. Mol Ecol 9:983–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Züghart W, Breckling B (2003) Konzeptionelle Entwicklung eines Monitoring von Umweltwirkungen transgener Kulturpflanzen, Teil 1 und 2. UBA-Texte 50/03:1–543

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Konstantinstr. 110, 53179, Bonn, Germany

    Wiebke Züghart, Armin Benzler, Frank Berhorn, Ulrich Sukopp & Frieder Graef

  2. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape- and Land Use Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374, Muencheberg, Germany

    Frieder Graef

Authors
  1. Wiebke Züghart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Armin Benzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Berhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ulrich Sukopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frieder Graef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frieder Graef.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Züghart, W., Benzler, A., Berhorn, F. et al. Determining indicators, methods and sites for monitoring potential adverse effects of genetically modified plants to the environment: the legal and conceptional framework for implementation. Euphytica 164, 845–852 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9475-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9475-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation