Skip to main content
Log in

Linked dominant alleles or inter-locus interaction results in a major shift in pomegranate fruit acidity of ‘Ganesh’ × ‘Kabul Yellow’

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Inheritance of fruit acidity in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) was studied in 3 sweet or low acid (‘Ganesh’, ‘Ruby’ and ‘Kabul Yellow’) and 3 sour or high acid (‘Nana’, ‘Daru’ and ‘Double Flower’) varieties and their progenies. The F1 and F2 data of ‘Ganesh’ × ‘Nana’ showed that fruit acidity is monogenically controlled and the sour nature is dominant over sweet. Further, whether a genotype produces sweet or sour fruit is determined by a major gene (SS) while a few modifiers with small effects cause fluctuations in the acidity levels within sour and sweet types. All the trees of 3 crosses involving ‘Daru’ produced acidic fruits but those of (‘Ganesh’ × ‘Nana’) × ‘Daru’ reached acidity as high as 71.2 g/l which could be because of cumulative influence of modifying genes derived from the two acidic varieties ‘Nana’ and ‘Daru’. Pollination of functionally sterile ‘Double Flower’ variety with single (normal) flower types revealed that ‘Double Flower’ is a dominant mutant from an acidic fruited genotype (Ss). The segregation pattern in F1 indicated the possible linkage between genes governing total acidity and flower type. All the F1 hybrids between ‘Kabul Yellow’ and ‘Ganesh’ (sweet × sweet) were sour fruited with almost 8-fold jump in fruit acidity over the mid-parental value. The steep increase in acidity cannot be convincingly attributed to overdominance which is certainly rare at major gene level. Alternatively, linked dominant alleles or epistatic effect of neighboring loci which readily simulate overdominance (pseudo-overdominance) could have caused a major shift in F1 fruit acidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque B, Lidon FC, Barreiro MG (2006) A case study on the flavor properties of melon (Cucumis melo L.) cultivars. Fruits 61(5):333–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cains JF (1940) The pomegranate. J Bombay National Hort Sci 42:13–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron JW, Soot RK (1969) Citrus. In: Ferwerda FL, Wit F (eds) Outlines of perennial crop breeding in tropics. H. Veenman and Zonen, N.V. Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 129–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay PK, Patra SC (1993) Effect of various soil covers on yield and quality of pomegranate. Ann Agricultural Res 14(3):317–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy H, Demirsoy L (2004) A study on the relationships between some fruit characteristics in cherries. Fruits 59:219–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhatt AS, Singh S, Dhaliwal MS, Cheema DS, Singh S (2001) Genetic analysis of tomato hybrids incorporating nor, rin and alc alleles for quality. Crop Improve 28(1):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Nemr SE, Ismail IA, Ragab M (1990) Chemical composition of juice and seeds of pomegranate fruit. Food/Nahrung 34:7601–6606

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Azzouni MM, Shahin MA, Zaki MA, Zaki HA (1979) Effect of certain herbicides on the quality of pear fruits. Research Bulletin, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University No.1127, 15 pp

  • Falconer DS (1983) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longaman Group Lt., Essex, England, 340 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang DQ, Federici CT, Roose ML (1997) Development of molecular markers linked to a gene controlling fruit acidity in citrus. Genome 40(6):841–849

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop SH, Kumar PS (1990) Use of gene marker to study the mode of pollination in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). J Hort Sci (UK) 62:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop SH, Kumar PS (1998) Use of semi-soft and hard-seeded types of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) for improvement of fruit attributes. Indian J Agric Sci 68:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop SH, Tiwari RB, Kumar PS (2000) Amlidana: a new pomegranate hybrid. Indian Hort 47:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop SH (2003) Rosetted siblings in F2 of a cross of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) can be useful model for rosetting investigations. Euphytica 131:333–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop SH, Rawal RD, Laxman RH, Kumar R (2003) Scope for gene exchange between cultivated and decorative pomegranates. National Seminar on Advances in Genetics and Plant Breeding –Impact of DNA Revolution Oct. 30–31, 2003, U A S, Dhrawad

  • Jalikop SH, Rawal RD, Kumar R (2005) Exploitation of sub-temperate pomegranate ‘Daru’ in breeding tropical varieties. Acta Hort 696:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalikop SH, Kumar PS, Rawal RD, Kumar R (2006) Breeding pomegranate for fruit attributes and resistance to bacterial blight. Indian J Hort. 63 (4):351–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim WC, Ko KC (1993) Studies on the inheritance of major characters in oriental pear cultivars (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai and P. pyrifolia X P. ussuriensis). RDA J Agric Sci Hort 35(2):476–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawand BT, Patil VK (1996) Effect of different water regimes on fruit quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Int J Tropical Agric 14:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin GM (1995) Aspects of pomegranate culture in Turkmenistan. Plant Genetic Resour Newsletter 102:29–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Li BJ, Lin GY, Jing SX, Zhu DW (1995) Studies on the inheritance and selection of sweetness and acidity of apples. Acta Hort 403:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma RJ, Yu ML, Tang XL (1997) Inheritance of growth habit and fruit flavour in dwarf peach. South China Fruits 26(3):39–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Melgarejo P, Salazar DM, Artés F (2000) Organic acids and sugars composition of harvested pomegranate fruits. Eur Food Res Technol 211(3):185–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel G, Dandlen S, Neves A, Martins D (2004) The effect of two methods of pomegranate (Punica granatum L) juice extraction on quality during storage at 4°C. Biomed Biotechnol 2004(5):332–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poyrazoğlu E, Gokmen V, Artik N (2002) Organic acids and phenolic compounds in pomegranates (Punica granatum L) grown in Turkey. J Food Compos Anal 15(5):567–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Procopiou J, Wallace A (1979) Effects of arsenic sprays on different citrus fruit juice acidity. Alexandria J Agric Res 27(1):93–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pruthi JS, Saxena AK (1984) Studies in anardana (dried pomegranate seeds). J Food Sci Technol 21:296–299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sha GL, Li GY, Guo CC, Chang QS, Wu CR (1998) Study on inheritance trends of pear fruit nutrient composition. Adv Hort 2:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SD, Sharma VK 1990. Variation for chemical characters in some promising strains of pomegranates. Euphytica 49:131–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman Y, Berstein LF, Lavee S (1984) Pomegranate fruit development and maturation. J Hort Sci 59(2):265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1981) Principles of crop improvement. Longaman, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sistrunk WA, Moore JN (1986) Quality. In: Moore JN, Janick J (eds) Methods in fruit breeding. Purdu University, Indiana, USA, pp 274–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma KS, Bhandari AR (1996) Effect of N P K and micronutrients on the fruit yield and quality of peach (Prunus persica Batsch). Scientific Hort 5:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser T, Verhaegh JJ (1978) Inheritance and selection of some fruit characters of apple. Inheritance of low and high acidity. Euphytica 27(3):753–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Director (IIHR) for providing facilities, Drs. N. K. Krishna Kumar and B. N. S. Murthy for helpful suggestions and Ravindra Kumar and T. S. Vittala for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Jalikop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jalikop, S.H. Linked dominant alleles or inter-locus interaction results in a major shift in pomegranate fruit acidity of ‘Ganesh’ × ‘Kabul Yellow’. Euphytica 158, 201–207 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9443-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9443-1

Keywords

Navigation