Summary
In this study a new trigeneric hybrid involving species from the Triticum, Secale and Leymus was produced by crossing octoploid triticale (Jinsong49) with octoploid tritileymus (950059). The chromosome constitution of the parental amphiploid, trigeneric hybrid and its progenies were studied. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analysis showed that Jinsong49 and 950059 had 44 wheat chromosomes, and 12 rye chromosomes, 12 L. mollis chromosomes respectively. The mean meiotic configuration of trigeneric hybrid F1 was 13.17 I + 20.82 II + 0.37 III + 0.02 IV. GISH results indicated the trigeneric hybrid F1 had 6 rye chromosomes and 6 Leymus chromosomes. In the selfed derivatives of the trigeneric hybrids, while the number of selfed generation increased, the mean number of chromosomes tends to decrease gradually and slowly. GISH results revealed that most plant tested in the progeny population had 8–12 rye chromosomes, and no Leymus chromosomes were detected. The results indicated that rye chromosomes can be preferentially transmitted in the progenies of trigeneric hybrid than Leymus chromosomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cabrera, A. & A. Martin, 1992. A trigeneric hybrids between Hordeum, Aegilops, and Secale. Genome 35: 647–649.
Fernadez-Escober, J. & A. Martin, 1989. A self-fertile trigeneric hybrid in the Triticeae involving Triticum, Hordeum and Secale. Euphytica 42: 291–296.
Fu, J., S.Y. Chen & A.J. Zhang, 1993. Studies of the formation and cytogenetics of octoploid Tritileymus. Acta Genetica Sinica 20: 317–323.
Gupta, P.K. & G. Fedak, 1986. Intergeneric hybrids between × Triticosecale cv. Welsh(2n=42) and three genotypes of Agropyron intermedium(2n=42). Can J Gent Cytol 28: 176–179.
Han, F.P., X.Q. Zhang, X.L. Bu, M.Y. He, S. Hao, Y.Z. Ma & Z.Y. Xin, 1998. Variation of wheatgrass chromosomes in wheat-wheatgrass alien addition line ‘TAL-27’ revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Sci Chin (Series C) 41: 367–371.
Jauhar, P.P., M. Dogramaci & T.S. Peterson, 2004. Synthesis and cytological characterization of trigeneric hybrids of durum wheat with and without Ph1. Genome 47: 1173–1181.
Jiang, J.M., B. Fribe & B.S. Gill, 1994. Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica 73: 199–212.
Kosina, R. & J.S. Heslp-Harrison, 1996. Molecular Cytogenetics of an amphiploid Trigeneric Hybrid between Triticum durum, Thinopyrum distichum and Lophopyrum elongatum. Annals of Botany 78: 583–589.
Li, L.H. & Y.C. Dong, 1993. A self-fertile trigeneric hybrid, Triticum aestivum × Agropyron michnoi × Secale Cereale. TAG 87: 361–368
Li, X.F., S.B. Liu, J.R. Gao, W.H. Lu & H.G. Wang, 2005. Abnormal pollen development of bread wheat-Leymus mollis partial amphiploid. Euphytica 144(3): 247–253.
Mujeeb-Kazi, A., 1996. Apomixia in trigeneric Hybrids of Triticum aestivum /Leymus racemosus //Thinopyrum elongatum. Cytologia 61: 15–18.
Orellana, J., J.F. Vazquez & J.M. Carrillo, 1989. Genome analysis in wheat- rye- Aegilops caudate trigeneric hybrids. Genome 32: 169–172.
Sun, G.L., C. YEN, J.L. Yang & B.H. Wu, 1995. Production and cytogenetics of intergeneric hybrids between Triticum durum-Dasypyrum villosum amphiploid and Psathyrostachys huashanica. Euphytica 81: 7–11.
Sun, S.C., W.Y. Yuan, S.X. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Sun, M.R. Zhang & Z.Y. Pei, 1996. Production and cytogenetics of tetrageneric hybrids involving Triticum, Agropyron, Haynaldia and Secale. Acta Genetica Sinica 23: 214–219.
Tang, S.X., J.J. Zhuang, Y.X. Wen, A.S.J. Abydylla, H.J. Li & X. Jia, 1997. Identification of introgressed segments conferring disease resistance in a tetrageneric hybrid of Triticum, Secale, Thinopyrum, and Avena. Genome 40: 99–103.
Wang, X.P., J. Fu, X.Q. Zhang, J.K. Jing & Y.X. Wen, 2000. Molecular cytogenetic study on genome constitutions of octoploid Tritileymus. Acta Botanica Sinica 42: 582–586.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, XF., Song, ZQ., Liu, SB. et al. Cytogenetic Study of a Trigeneric (Triticale × Trileymus) Hybrid. Euphytica 150, 117–122 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9099-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9099-2