Abstract
This article examines gender differences in employment status among immigrants in Israel, and how these differences vary across origin groups. Analysis of the 1995 population census indicates that, all else being equal, immigrant women exert a negative effect on activity in the annual labor force. As time elapses, the probability of immigrant women being employed improves but remains considerably lower than that of both immigrant and native-born men. However, after a few years in the country, immigrant women do close the gap with native-born women. For employment status in the last week, being an immigrant woman has a positive effect on full-time employment. A detailed analysis reveals substantial stratification by country of birth. Thus, the patterns of employment status for immigrant groups can reflect different levels (single, double, and triple) of disadvantage or advantage for women. I attach this stratification to cultural background and social values of country of birth as well as to economic and religious considerations, not fully indexed by the census data.
Résumé
Cet article examine les différences par genre en fonction de la situation d’emploi parmi les immigrés en Israël, et la variation de ces différences en fonction du pays d’origine. L’analyse du recensement de population de 1995 indique que, toutes choses égales par ailleurs, la situation de femme immigrée est négativement associée à l’intégration dans le marché du travail. Au fur et à mesure que la durée de résidence s’allonge, la probabilité d’exercer une activité professionnelle s’élève, mais demeure considérablement plus faible que celle des hommes, qu’ils soient immigrés ou pas. Toutefois, après quelques années passées dans le pays, les femmes immigrées rejoignent le niveau d’activité des femmes nées en Israël. En ce qui concerne l’emploi au cours de la dernière semaine, la situation de femme immigrée a un effet positif sur l’exercice d’un emploi à temps plein. Une analyse détaillée révèle un stratification bien marquée par pays d’origine. Les caractéristiques de l’emploi pour les groupes d’immigrés peuvent refléter différents niveaux (simple, double, triple) d’avantage ou de désavantage pour les femmes, à relier au contexte culturel et aux valeurs sociales des pays d’origine, ainsi qu’à des dimensions économiques et religieuses qui ne peuvent être appréhendées par les données de recensement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This argument is nicely discussed in Gurak and Kritz 2000, pp. 417–418.
Our data did not permit the breakdown of last year’s immigrants by number of months in the country. This is an important factor that may influence employment characteristics.
Countries/areas of origin include (in alphabetic order): Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Egypt, Ethiopia, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, India, Iran, Iraq, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Libya, Moldova, Morocco, Other Asia–Africa, Other East Europe, Other Latin America, Other former Soviet Union, Other West Europe, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Syria, The Netherlands, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, former Soviet Union (with no specification of republic of birth), Uzbekistan, Yemen.
The question on occupation was administered only to respondents who worked in the last week before the census. This did not allow us to include occupation as an explanatory variable in the multinomial logistic regression. We did, however, include this variable for predicting full-time (score 1) versus part-time (score 0) employment. Results from logistic regression revealed that all else being equal, immigrant women in clerical and service jobs, as compared to professionals, are significantly more likely to work full-time with respective odds ratios of 2.484 and 2.235.
The Labor Force Gender Parity Index is “the ratio of the percentage of women who are economically active to the percentage of men who are” (2004 World Development Indicators, p. 31).
Regrettably, our data set does not contain any measure of religious orientation or behavior to clarify the role of this factor as a determinant of employment status.
References
Adsera, A., & Chiswick, B. R. (2006). Divergent patterns in immigrant earnings across European destinations. In C. A. Parsons & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), Immigration and the transformation of Europe (pp. 85–110). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Antecol, H. (2000). An examination of cross-country differences in the gender gap in labor-force participation rates. Labour Economics, 7, 409–426.
Baker, M., & Benjamin, D. (1997). The role of family in immigrants’ labor-market activity: an evaluation of alternative explanations. The American Economic Review, 87(4), 705–727.
Bean, F. D., & Tienda, M. (1987). The hispanic population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Borjas, G. J. (1982). The earnings of male hispanic immigrants in the United States. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 35(3), 343–353.
Boyd, M. (1984). At a disadvantage: The occupational attainments of foreign born women in Canada. International Migration Review, 18(4), 1091–1119.
Boyle, P., Cooke, T. J., Halfacree, K., & Smith, D. (2001). A cross-national comparison of the impact of family migration on women’s employment status. Demography, 38(2), 201–213.
Carliner, G. (1996). The wages and language skills of U.S. immigrants. Working paper no. 5763. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Central Bureau of Statistics (2004). Statistical abstract of Israel, 2004, (Vol. 55). Jerusalem: CBS.
Chiswick, B. R. (1979). The economic progress of immigrants: Some apparently universal patterns. In W. Fellner (Ed.), Contemporary economic problems, 1979 (pp. 357–399). Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
Chiswick, B. R. (1978). The effect of Americanization on the earnings of foreign-born men. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 897–922.
Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (1998). English language fluency among immigrants in the United States. Research in Labor Economics, 17, 151–200.
Chiswick, B. R., & Sullivan, T. A. (1995). The new immigrants. In F. Reynolds (eds.), State of the Union: America in the 1990s (Volume Two: Social Trends) (pp. 211–270). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Chiswick, B. R., & Wenz, M. (2006). The linguistic and economic adjustment of Soviet Jewish immigrants in the United States, 1980 to 2000. Research in Labor Economics, 24, 179–216
Chiswick, B. R., Lee, Y. L., & Miller, P. W. (2003). Patterns of immigrant occupational attainment in a longitudinal survey. International Migration, 41(4), 47–68.
Cohen, Y., Haberfeld, Y., & Kristal, T. (2004). Ethnicity and mixed ethnicity: educational gaps among Israeli-born Jews. Discussion paper No. 5-2004, Tel Aviv University: The Pinhas Sapir Center for Development.
Constant, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2004). How do labor migrants fare. In K. F. Zimmermann & A. Constant (Eds.), How labor migrants fare (pp. 1–11). Berlin: Springer.
Cooke, T. J., & Bailey, A. J. (1996). Family migration and the employment of married women and men. Economic Geography, 72(1), 38–48.
Da Vanzo, J. (1981). Microeconomic approaches to studying migration decision. In G. F. De Jong & R. W. Gardner (Eds.), Migration decision making: Multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries (pp. 90–129). New York: Pergamon.
Dashefsky, A., DeAmicis, J., Lazerwitz, B., & Tabory, E. (1992). Americans abroad: A comparative study of emigrants from the United States. New York and London: Plenum Press.
De Dunn, S., & Paul, B. K. (2002). Labour-market participation of Asian Indian immigrant women in the greater Kansas City metropolitan area, USA. International Journal of Population Geography, 8(6), 409–428.
De Jong, G. F., & Madamba, A. B. (2001). A double disadvantage? Minority group, immigrant status, and underemployment in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 117–130.
DellaPergola, S. (1993). Jews in the European community: Socio-demographic trends and challenges. American Jewish year book 1993, (Vol. 93, pp. 25–82).
DellaPergola, S. (2004). Demography in Israel at the dawn of the twenty-first century. In U. Rebhun & C. I. Waxman (Eds.), Jews in Israel: Contemporary social and cultural patterns. (pp. 20–44). Hanover and London: University Press of New England/Brandeis University Press.
Dumon, W. A. (1981). The situation of migrant women workers. International Migration, 19(1/2), 190–209.
Elder, G. H. Jr (1990). Perspectives in the life course. In G. H. Elder Jr (Ed.), Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980 (pp. 23–49). Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Epstein, C. F. (1973). Positive effects on the multiple negative: Explaining the success of black professional women. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 912–935.
Evans, M. D. R. (1989). Immigrant entrepreneurship: Effects of ethnic market size and isolated labor market pool. American Sociological Review, 54(6), 950–962.
Evans, M. D. R. (1984). Immigrant women in Australia: Resources, family, and work. International Migration Review, 18(4), 1063–1090.
Friedlander, D., Okun, B. S., Eisenbach, Z., & Elmakias, L. L. (2002). Immigration, social change and assimilation: Educational attainment among birth cohorts of Jewish ethnic groups in Israel, 1925–29 to 1965–69. Population Studies, 56(2), 135–150.
Goldscheider, C. (1974). American aliyah: Sociological and demographic perspectives. In M. Sklare (Ed.), The Jew in American society (pp. 367–374). New York.
Goldstein, S. (1992). Profile of American Jewry: Insights from the 1990 national Jewish population survey. American Jewish Year Book 1992, 92, 77–173.
Gonen, A. (1995). Settlement of the immigrants: Geographic patterns. In M. Sicron & E. Leshem (Eds.), Profile of an immigration wave: The absorption process of immigrants from the former Soviet Union, 1990–1995 (pp. 232–269). Jerusalem: The Magnes Press (in Hebrew).
Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers (2nd ed.). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Greenlees, C. S., & Saenz, R. (1999). Determinants of employment of recently arrived Mexican immigrant wives. International Migration Review, 33(2), 354–377.
Gurak, D. T., & Kritz, M. M. (2000). Social context, household composition and employment among migrant and nonmigrant dominican women. International Migration Review, 30(2), 399–422.
Haberfeld, Y. (1993). Immigration and ethnic origin: The effect of demographic attributes on earnings of Israeli men and women. International Migration Review, 27(2), 286–305.
Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (1995). Gender, work, and place. London and New York: Routledge.
Hoffman-Nowotny, H.-J. (1978). Sociological and demographic aspects of the changing status of migrant women in Europe. In M. Niphuis-Nell (Ed.), Demographic aspects of the changing status of women in Europe (pp. 117–135). Boston and London: Leiden: Nijhoff.
Kats, R. (1982). The immigrant women: Double cost or relative improvement? International Migration Review, 16(3), 661–677.
Katz, E., & Stark, O. (1987). International Migration under Asymmetric Information. The Economic Journal, 97(387), 718–726.
Katz, E., & Stark, O. (1984). Migration and asymmetric information: Comment. The American Economic Review, 74(3), 533–534.
Klinuv, R. (2005). Women work more, but what with men? In E. Ben-Yehuda (Ed.), Ha’Aretz Newspaper: The marker (economic supplement), 2 September, (p. 3) (in Hebrew).
Kossoudji, S. A. (1989). Immigrant worker assimilations: Is it a labor market phenomenon? Journal of Human Resources, 23(4), 494–527.
Kossoudji, S. A., & Ranney, S. I. (1984). The labor market experience of female migrants: The case of temporary Mexican migration to the U.S. International Migration Review, 18(4), 1120–1143.
Lieberson, S. (1980). A piece of pie: Blacks and white immigrants since 1880. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lieberson, S., & Waters, M. C. (1988). From many strands: Ethnic and racial groups in contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Long, J. E. (1980). The effect of Americanization on earnings: Some evidence for women. Journal of Political Economy, 88(3), 620–629.
Massey, D. D., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1994). An evaluation of international migration theory: The north American case. Population and Development Review, 20(4), 699–751.
McAllister, I. (1995). Occupational mobility among immigrants: The impact of migration on economic success in Australia. International Migration Review, 29(2), 441–467.
Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 749–773.
Park, R. (1952). Human communities: The city and human ecology. New York: The Free Press.
Pekin, H. (1981). Migrant women in host countries: The situation of migrant women workers. International Migration, 19(1/2), 75–82.
Philzacklea, A. (1983). In the front line. In A. Philzacklea (Ed.), One way ticket: Migration and female labour (pp. 95–112). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Portes, A., & Bach, R. L. (1985) Latin journey: Cuban and Mexican immigrants in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poston, D. L. Jr. (1994). Patterns of economic attainment of foreign-born male workers in the United States. International Migration Review, 28(3), 478–500.
Presser, H. B. (1989). Can we make time for children: The economy, work schedules, and child care. Demography, 26(4), 523–543.
Raijman, R., & Semyonov, M. (1995). Modes of labor market incorporation and occupational cost among new immigrants to Israel. International Migration Review, 29(2), 375–393.
Raijman, R., & Semyonov, M. (1997). Gender, ethnicity, and immigration: double disadvantage and triple disadvantage among recent immigrant women in the Israeli labor market. Gender & Society, 11(1), 108–125.
Rebhun, U., & Waxman, C. I. (2001). The ‘Americanization’ of Israel: A demographic, cultural and political evaluation. Israel Studies, 5(1), 65–91.
Reimers, C. W. (1985). Cultural differences in labor force participation among married women. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 75, 251–255.
Schmelz, U. O., DellaPergola, S., & Avner, U. (1991). Ethnic differences among Israeli Jews: A new look. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The American Jewish Committee.
Schoeni, R. F. (1998). Labor market assimilation of immigrant women. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51(3), 483–505.
Semyonov, M. (1980). The social context of women’s labor force participation: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 86(3), 534–550.
Semyonov, M., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2005). Labor migration, remittances, and household income: A comparison between Filipino and Filipina overseas workers. International Migration Review, 39(1), 45–68.
Semyonov, M., & Lerenthal, T. (1991). Country of origin, gender, and the attainment of socioeconomic status: A study of stratification in the Jewish population in Israel. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 10, 325–343.
Simon, J. L., & Sullivan, R. J. (1988). More on immigrants’ earnings over time. Genus, 44(1–2), 157–175.
Stier, H., & Tienda, M. (1992). Family, work and women: The labor supply of hispanic immigrant wives. International Migration Review, 26(4), 1291–1313.
Sullivan, T. A. (1984). The occupational prestige of women immigrants: A comparison of Cubans and Mexicans. International Migration Review, 18(4), 1045–1062.
The World Bank (2004) 2004 World Development Indicators.
Tienda, M., & Glass, J. (1985). Household structure and labor force participation of black, hispanics, and white mothers. Demography, 22(3), 381–394.
Waxman, P. (2001). The economic adjustment of recently arrived Bosnian, Afghan and Iraqi refugees in Sydney, Australia. International Migration Review, 35(2), 472–505.
Willis, K., & Yeoh, B. (2000). Introduction. In K. Willis & B. Yeoh (Eds.), Gender and migration. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Wong, M. G., & Hirschman, C. (1983). Labor force participation and socioeconomic attainment of Asian–American women. Sociological Perspectives, 26(4), 423–446.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the Julian Simon Research Fund, School of Business Administration, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The study was carried out during the author’s sabbatical year, as a visiting scholar, at the Center for Demography and Ecology (CDE), The University of Wisconsin-Madison. An earlier version of this article was presented at the CDE seminar, January 25, 2005; at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, March 29–April 1, 2006 in Los Angeles (poster); at the IZA 3rd Migration Meeting, May 20–21, 2006 in Bonn; and at the European Population Conference, June 21–24, 2006 in Liverpool. I gratefully acknowledge the help of Benny Anderman in computer programming and data analysis. The comments on the article received from the editors and two anonymous referees of EJP were especially helpful. Responsibility for the contents of this article rests solely with the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rebhun, U. A Double Disadvantage? Immigration, Gender, and Employment Status in Israel. Eur J Population 24, 87–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-007-9137-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-007-9137-3