Skip to main content
Log in

The ethics of information transparency

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper investigates the ethics of information transparency (henceforth transparency). It argues that transparency is not an ethical principle in itself but a pro-ethical condition for enabling or impairing other ethical practices or principles. A new definition of transparency is offered in order to take into account the dynamics of information production and the differences between data and information. It is then argued that the proposed definition provides a better understanding of what sort of information should be disclosed and what sort of information should be used in order to implement and make effective the ethical practices and principles to which an organisation is committed. The concepts of “heterogeneous organisation” and “autonomous computational artefact” are further defined in order to clarify the ethical implications of the technology used in implementing information transparency. It is argued that explicit ethical designs, which describe how ethical principles are embedded into the practice of software design, would represent valuable information that could be disclosed by organisations in order to support their ethical standing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens, M. (2006). Computer and computer peripheral fires with a discussion of batteries. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

  • Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPiazza, S. A., & Eccles, R. G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2004). Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy, 35, 554–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2006). The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2007). In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 3(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2008). Data. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Detroit: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods (UW CSE Technical Report 02-12-01). Department of Computer Science and Engineering: Seattle, University of Washington.

  • Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., & Science Museum (Great Britain) (Eds.). (2001). Biotechnology, 1996–2000: The years of controversy. London: Science Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B. (1995). Ethical banking: The case of the co-operative bank. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(12), 1005–1013.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R., Caldwell, N., & Harrison, D. (2004). Developing the concept of transparency for use in supply relationships. British Journal of Management, 15, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, R. E., & Renn, O. (1997). The Brent Spar controversy: An example of risk communication gone wrong. Risk Analysis, 17(2), 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magretta, J. (1997). Growth through global sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C. (2002). The relationship between corporate governance, transparency and financial disclosure. Corporate governance, 10(4), 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. (2003). Ford motor company and the firestone tyre recall. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(3), 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moor, J. H. (1997). Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. SIGCAS Computer and Society, 27(3), 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., & Turilli, M. (2007). Dynamics of control. In TASE 2007 (pp. 440–449).

  • Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). The metaphilosophy of information. Minds and Machines, 17(3), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). Information gain from inference. In LogKCA-07, international workshop on logic and philosophy of knowledge, rationality, and action (pp. 351–368). Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain: The University of Basque Country Press.

  • Sparkes, R. (2001). Ethical investment: Whose ethics, which investment? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turilli, M. (2007). Ethical protocols design. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turilli, M. (2008). Ethics and the practice of software design. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy. Amsterdam: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2006). Firm information transparency: Ethical questions in the information age. In Social informatics: An information society for all? In remembrance of Rob Kling (pp. 145–156). New York: Springer.

  • Warwick, S. (2001). Is copyright ethical? An examination of the theories, laws and practices regarding the private the private ownership of intellectual work in the United States. In R. A. Spinello & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp.␣263–279). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, B. (2000). Which kind of transparency? On the need for clarity in monetary policy-making. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

One of us, Turilli, wishes to thank the Director of the Centre for Ethics and Economics and Business for his kind invitation to present a previous version of this paper at the conference ICT, transparency and social responsibility, 7–9 October, 2007 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal. Turilli also wishes to thank all the conference participants, particularly Deborah Johnson, Jeroen van den Hoven and Antonino Vaccaro for their useful feedback. Special thanks are extended to the Oxford e-Science Research Centre for their financial and scientific support. We both express our gratitude to members of the IEG, University of Oxford, and of the GPI, University of Hertfordshire, for their critique of earlier versions of this work. We remain the only persons responsible for any of its shortcomings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Turilli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turilli, M., Floridi, L. The ethics of information transparency. Ethics Inf Technol 11, 105–112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9187-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9187-9

Keywords

Navigation