Skip to main content
Log in

Lost in cyberspace: ethical decision making in the online environment

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a 20-item questionnaire was used to elicit undergraduates’ (N = 93) ethical judgment and behavioral intention regarding a number of behaviors involving computers and internet usage. Machiavellianism was found to be uncorrelated with both ethical judgment and behavioral intention. Gender was found to be negatively correlated with both ethical judgment and behavioral intention, such that females judged the behaviors as being less ethical than males, and were less likely to engage in the behaviors than males. A disconnect was found between ethical judgment and behavioral intention, for both males and females, such that the ethical judgment mean for a number of issues was significantly lower (towards the “unethical” end of the continuum) than the behavioral intention mean (towards the “more likely to engage in” end of the continuum). The study raises questions regarding ethical awareness of technology-related issues, and the authors make suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.P. Barlow. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, 1996. Retrieved from http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html. February 19, 2006.

  • D.J. Brass, K.D. Butterfield, and B.C. Skaggs. Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23: 14–31, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Chiou, C. Huang, and H. Lee. The Antecedents of Music Piracy Attitudes and Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 57: 161–174, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Christians. Utilitarianism in Media Ethics and its Discontents. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22: 113–131, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Christie and F.L. Geis. Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press, New York, 1970.

  • D. Collins. Organizational Harm, Legal Condemnation and Stakeholder Retaliation: A Typology, Research Agenda and Application. Journal of Business Ethics, 8: 1–13, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Collins. The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1500 Articles Published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26: 1–73, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.P. Cronan, L.N.K. Leonard, and J. Kreie. An Empirical Validation of Perceived Importance and Behavior Intention in IT Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 56: 231–238, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • O.C. Ferrell and L.G. Gresham. A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49: 87–96, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Freestone and V.-W. Mitchell. Generation Y Attitudes Towards E-ethics and Internet-related Misbehaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 54: 121–128, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.F. Frey. Investigating Moral Intensity with the World-Wide Web: A Look at Participant Reactions and A Comparison of Methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32: 423–431, 2000.

  • M. Gross. Higher Education Unlicensed Software Experience – Student and Academics Survey, 2005, June. Retrieved from the Business Software Alliance Web site: http://www.definetheline.com/resources/BSA-Ipsos-Education-Survey-June2005.pdf. February 26, 2006.

  • L. Grossman. It’s All Free! Music! Movies! TV Shows! Millions of People Download Them Every Day. Is Digital Piracy Killing the Entertainment Industry? Time, 161(18): 61–70, 2003, May 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Gunkel. What’s the Matter with Books? Configurations, 11: 277–303, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.B. Gupta, S.J. Gould, and B. Pola. “To Pirate or not to Pirate”: A Comparative Study of the Ethical Versus Other Influences on the Consumer’s Software Acquisition-mode Decision. Journal of Business Ethics, 55: 255–274, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.H. Hegarty and H.P. Sims Jr. Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 451–457, 1978.

  • W.H. Hegarty and H.P. Sims Jr. Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 331–338, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.E. Jones and M.J. Kavanaugh. An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 511–523, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.V. Lewis. Defining ‹Business Ethics’: Like Nailing Jello to a Wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4: 377–383, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 2005. Retrieved from http://www.laws.findlaw.com/us/000/04-480.html. January 27, 2006.

  • J.R. Rest. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger, New York, 1986.

  • A. Singhapakdi. Ethical Perceptions of Marketers: The Interaction Effects of Machiavellianism and Organizational Ethical Culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 12: 407–418, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.E. Stead, D.L. Worrell, and J.G. Stead. An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 233–242, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.K. Trevino. Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A␣Person-situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617, 1986.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan M. McMahon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMahon, J.M., Cohen, R. Lost in cyberspace: ethical decision making in the online environment. Ethics Inf Technol 11, 1–17 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9165-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9165-7

Keywords

Navigation