Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding stakeholder relationships in sustainable brownfield regeneration: a combined FAHP and SNA approach

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systematic and comprehensive understanding of stakeholder relationships is the key component for achieving social sustainability of brownfield regeneration (BR), which has not been recognized by existing researches. Based on the widely acknowledged idea of social networks, this paper proposes a systematic research framework for the analysis of stakeholder relationships, with a focus on the dynamic and networked nature of relationships. The relationship network of stakeholders in BR is considered from three aspects: identifying the stakeholders and relationships among them, quantifying stakeholder relationships, and analyzing relationships network structure. The proposed stakeholder relationships analysis framework uses empirical methods (i.e., interviews and surveys), rationalistic methods (i.e., fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and social network analysis (SNA)) to analyze stakeholder relationships. To demonstrate the usability of the proposed framework, we apply it to the BR in China. The results show that: (1) it is feasible to mine the relationships of stakeholders from the social network perspective; (2) from the individual network aspect, the government, developers, government are at the core of the network with the highest network centrality during the recycling and contamination treatment stage, the construction stage and the use stage, respectively; (3) from the local network aspect, different cohesive subgroups with strong linkages are formed throughout the life cycle of BR; (4) from the overall network aspect, the highest density of the use stage means that there is good cohesion among stakeholders at this stage; the centralization of the construction stage is the highest, indicating that the stakeholders have relatively concentrated network power and loose relationships. The paper puts forward suggestions for improving the network structure of stakeholder relationships, including strengthening the network relationship between the government and environmental non-government organizations (ENGOs), improving the monitoring efficiency and network status of news media, establishing a construction consulting platform that effectively serves the public and end-users, forming the alliances among end-users, the public and ENGOs and enhancing the relationship network stability. Overall, this study helps to clarify stakeholder relationships by providing a systematic framework to encourage better stakeholder engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahmad, N., Zhu, Y., Shao, J., & Lin, H. (2020). Stakeholders’ perspective on strategies to promote contaminated site remediation and brownfield redevelopment in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 14614–14633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrescu, F. M., Rizzo, E., Pizzol, L., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2016). The social embeddedness of brownfield regeneration actors: insights from social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1539–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alker, S., Joy, V., Roberts, P., & Smith, N. (2000). The definition of brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(1), 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardos, R. P., Jones, S., Stephenson, I., Menger, P., Beumer, V., Neonato, F., Maring, L., Ferber, U., Track, T., & Wendler, K. (2016). Optimising value from the soft re-use of brownfield sites. Science of the Total Environment, 563, 769–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayulken, B., & Huisingh, D. (2015). Are lessons from eco-towns helping planners make more effective progress in transforming cities into sustainable urban systems: A literature review (Part 2 of 2). Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, A., & Cummings, L. (2015). Measuring corporate environmental performance-stakeholder engagement evaluation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(5), 309–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, O., Ramirez-Sanchez, E. H., Prell, C. (2011). A social relational approach to natural resource governance. Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press

  • Buckley, J. J., Feuring, T., Hayashi, Y. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. IEEE fuzzy systems conference proceedings, p 12

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1994). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. The Economic Journal, 104(424): 685–686.

  • Cundy, A. B., Bardos, R. P., Church, A., Puschenreiter, M., Friesl-Hanl, W., Müller, I., Neu, S., Mench, M., Witters, N., & Vangronsveld, J. (2013). Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: The European context. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 283–291.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cundy, A. B., Bardos, R. P., Puschenreiter, M., Mench, M., Bert, V., Friesl-Hanl, W., Müller, I., Li, X. N., Weyens, N., Witters, N., & Vangronsveld, J. (2016). Brownfields to green fields: Realising wider benefits from practical contaminant phytomanagement strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 67–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill, M. (2010). Strengthening the “social” in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustainable Development, 18, 362–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dair, C., & Williams, M. K. (2006). Sustainable land reuse: The influence of different stakeholders in achieving sustainable brownfield developments in England. Environment and Planning, 38(7), 1345–1366.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, C., & Ghoshal, S. (2012). Redevelopment of brownfield sites (pp. 99–117). Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, T., & Pocock, W. M. (2006). An analysis of the UK development industry’s role in brownfield regeneration. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 24(6), 521–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0521151740

  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1 (3): 215–239.

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glicken, J. (2000). Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: A discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environmental Science & Policy, 3(6), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1(1), 201–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groce, J. E., Farrelly, M. A., Jorgensen, B. S., & Cook, C. N. (2019). Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 33(1), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenat, S., Dougill, A. J., & Dallimer, M. (2020). Social network analysis reveals a lack of support for greenspace conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, P., Li, H., Zhang, G., & Tian, W. (2021). Contaminated site–induced health risk using Monte Carlo simulation: Evaluation from the brownfield in Beijing, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 25166–25178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, D., Haase, A., & Rink, D. (2014). Conceptualizing the nexus between urban shrinkage and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 159–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Q., Zhu, Y., Ke, G. Y., & Hipel, K. W. (2019). Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks. Land Use Policy, 84, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introduction to social network methods. University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harclerode, M., Ridsdale, D. R., Darmendrail, D., Bardos, P., Alexandrescu, F., Nathanail, P., Pizzol, L., & Rizzo, E. (2015). Integrating the social dimension in remediation decision-making: State of the practice and way forward. Remediation Journal, 26(1), 11–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellstroem, M., Ruuska, I., Wikstroem, K., & Jåfs, K. (2013). Project governance and path creation in the early stages of Finnish nuclear power projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 712–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. J., & Kang, Y. (2019). Relationship among pollution concerns, attitudes toward social problems, and environmental perceptions in abandoned sites using Bayesian inferential analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8), 8007–8018.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larissa. et al (1999). Networks in the global village: life in contemporary communities, B, Wellman. (ed) Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3):898-899

  • Li, Q., Wang, L., Zhu, Y., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Fostering land use sustainability through construction land reduction in China: An analysis of key success factors using fuzzy-AHP and DEMATEL. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-202001/v1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limasset, E., Pizzol, L., Merly, C., Gatchett, A. M., Le Guern, C., Martinát, S., Klusáček, P., & Bartke, S. (2018). Points of attention in designing tools for regional brownfield prioritization. Science of the Total Environment, 622, 997–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., Zhu, Y., Ahmad, N., & Han, Q. (2019). A scientometric analysis and visualization of global research on brownfields. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 17666–17684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2019) Whole network approach: using instructions of UCIENT: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, in Chinese

  • Liu, Y., Li, H., Li, W., Li, Q., & Hu, X. (2021). Value assessment for the restoration of industrial relics based on analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Shaanxi steel factory in Xi’an, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 69129–69148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, D., Mitchell, C., & Webster, M. (2003). European common indicators: Towards a local sustainability profile. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/urban/pdf/ecifinal report

  • Marsclen, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinat, S., Dvorak, P., Frantal, B., Klusacek, P., Kunc, J., Navratil, J., Osman, R., Tureckova, K., & Reed, M. (2016). Sustainable urban development in a city affected by heavy industry and mining? Case study of brownfields in Karvina, Czech Republic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118, 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathey, J., Rossler, S., & Banse, J. (2015). Brownfields as an element of green infrastructure for implementing ecosystem services into urban areas. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, R. J., & Li, C. Z. (2017). Investigating key challenges in major public engineering projects by a network-theory based analysis of stakeholder concerns: A case study. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morio, M., Schädler, S., & Finkel, M. (2013). Applying a multi-criteria genetic algorithm framework for brownfield reuse optimization: Improving redevelopment options based on stakeholder preferences. Journal of Environmental Management, 130(1), 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., & Gilsing, V. A. (2004). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: A competence and governance view. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2(3), 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pediaditi, K., Doick, K. J., & Moffat, A. J. (2010). Monitoring and evaluation practice for brownfield, regeneration to greenspace initiatives: A meta-evaluation of assessment and monitoring tools. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(1), 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perovic, S., & Folić, N. K. (2012). Brownfield regeneration-imperative for sustainable urban development. Gradevinar, 64(5), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y., Gallagher, F., Deng, Y., Wu, M., & Feng, H. (2017). Risk assessment and interpretation of heavy metal contaminated soils on an urban brownfield site in New York metropolitan area. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(30), 23549–23558.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of environmental management, 90(5), 1933–1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, W., Geng, Y., Ma, Z., Sun, L., Xue, B., & Fujita, T. (2015). Reconsidering brownfield redevelopment strategy in China’s old industrial zone: A health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 2765–2775.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rescue, R. (2003). Analytical sustainability framework in the context of brownfield regeneration in France, Germany, Poland and the UK. Final report of work package 1

  • Rizzo, E., Pesce, M., Pizzol, L., Alexandrescu, F. M., Giubilato, E., Critto, A., Marcomini, A., & Bartke, S. (2015). Brownfield regeneration in Europe: identifying stakeholder perceptions, concerns, attitudes and information needs. Land Use Policy, 48, 437–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardinha, I. D., Craveiro, D., & Milheiras, S. (2013). A sustainability framework for redevelopment of rural brownfields: stakeholder participation at SÃO DOMINGOS mine, Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schadler, S., Finkel, M., & Bleicher, A. (2013). Spatially explicit computation of sustainability indicator values for the automated assessment of land-use options. Landscape & Urban Planning, 111(1), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis: A handbook. Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stezar, I. C., Ozunu, A., & Barry, D. L. (2014). The role of stakeholder attitudes in managing contaminated sites: survey of romanian stakeholder awareness. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(1), 787–800.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, Y., Mao, C., Liu, G., & Wang, X. (2017). Analysis of stakeholder relationships in the industry chain of industrialized building in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 387–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tim, D. (2006). Integrating sustainability into brownfield regeneration: Rhetoric or reality-an analysis of the UK development industry. Journal of Property Research, 23(3), 237–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Shen, W., Tang, W., Wang, Y., Duffield, C. F., & Hui, F. K. P. (2019). Understanding the social network of stakeholders in hydropower project development: An owners’ view. Renewable energy, 132, 326–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Thangasamy, V. K., Hou, Z., Tiong, R. L., & Zhang, L. (2020). Collaborative relationship discovery in BIM project delivery: A social network analysis approach. Automation in Construction, 114, 103147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., He, F., Zhuang, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in the decision-making of industrial land redevelopment in China: The case of Shanghai. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, H., Zhang, S., Su, Y., Wu, Z., & Yang, R. J. (2018). Effect of stakeholder collaborative management on off-site construction cost performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184(20), 490–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. H., Zhu, Y. M., He, L., & Mu, B. X. (2022). Recognizing and coordinating multidimensional dynamic stakeholder value conflicts for sustainability-oriented construction land reduction projects in Shanghai, China: An integrated SA-SNA-TRIZ approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 348, 131343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. H., Zhu, Y. M., He, L., Song, H. J., Mu, B. X., & Lyu, F. (2022). Recognizing and managing construction land reduction barriers for sustainable land use in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02022-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M. Z., & Wenmei, S. (2017). Empirical study on the relationship between environmental information disclosure and enterprise value based on DEA-FAHP model. Statistics & Decision, 2, 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Hipel, K. W., Ke, G. Y., & Chen, Y. (2015). Establishment and optimization of an evaluation index system for brownfield redevelopment projects. Environmental Modelling & Software, 74(C), 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has been supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 19FGLB060) and Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi (Grant Number 2022KRM031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710100, Shannxi, China

    Hongli Lin, Yuming Zhu, Jiahe Zhou, Bingxu Mu & Caihong Liu

Authors
  1. Hongli Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuming Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiahe Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bingxu Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Caihong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by HL, YZ, JZ, BM and CL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HL, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongli Lin, Yuming Zhu or Jiahe Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

The experimental protocol was established, and written informed consent was obtained from individual or guardian participants.

Consent for publish

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, H., Zhu, Y., Zhou, J. et al. Understanding stakeholder relationships in sustainable brownfield regeneration: a combined FAHP and SNA approach. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 15823–15859 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03275-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03275-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation