Skip to main content
Log in

An extended approach using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and weighting method for assessment of risk factors in the petrochemical industry

  • S.I. : Fuzzy optimization models
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining the share of project cost progress is among the essential issues in the planning phases of financial management and earned value management (EVM). The performance baseline is set up in the planning phase to measure cost deviations during project execution. Then, an estimate at completion (EAC) is forecasted based on the current cost progress. Traditionally, EVM only focuses on the cost performance index (CPI) and does not address other important aspects, such as complexity and risk, which are critical for all organizational stakeholders. In most cases, the cost factor is used to determine the percentage of the project’s financial progress. Despite its superior formulation, EVM forecasts are still influenced by project risks and uncertainties. These factors lead to inconsistency between EAC results obtained through standard formulae. In this study, a framework was developed in which a relatively complete set of criteria has been evaluated and ranked to improve cost progress estimation. Such criteria can be used in the proposed multi-criteria decision-making technique for activities related to peroxide project operations. Expert opinions in several groups have been collected using the group decision-making method. The risk of activities was identified using the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method. In addition, the rank of activities was determined by the Multi-Objective Optimization based on Ratio Analysis based on G-number theory (G-MOORA) method with an uncertainty approach. Linguistic indicators of importance and necessity in the decision matrix G were fuzzified through triangular numbers. In the next step, these values were normalized to definite numbers, and the cost progress of the project was calculated. The output is a table proposing fixed weights, indicating that adding weighting dimensions changes the calculation of the project cost percentage of progress for well-known activities that can be widely used in construction and installation projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahim Dabbagh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Enayati Fatollah, S., Dabbagh, R. & Shahsavar Jalavat, A. An extended approach using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and weighting method for assessment of risk factors in the petrochemical industry. Environ Dev Sustain (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02609-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02609-8

Keywords

Navigation