Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of culture in sustainable development and sustainable built environment: a review

  • Review
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mutual and interdependent link between the economic, social and environmental pillars forms the basis for sustainable development. In recent years, culture is also identified as an essential pillar in achieving sustainable development. However, a comprehensive review of published literature revealed limited studies which provide an overview of culture in sustainable development and the sustainable built environment. This study attempts to provide an overview of culture in sustainable development and the sustainable built environment by reviewing various reports of United Nations, sustainable development models, existing Green Building Rating Systems and published research. A generic set of cultural indicators and their benefits in the sustainable built environment are summarized based on bibliometric and comprehensive literature review. The study reveals several benefits of incorporating cultural elements into building design, such as improved cultural interactions, creating a sense of place, protecting place character, efficient use of energy and resources, creating job opportunities for local people, improved affordability and sustainable behavioral change. The identified generic cultural indicators act as a primary reference to develop context-specific cultural indicators while developing/enhancing building assessment/rating systems. The study outcome would also serve as a vital reference while developing region-specific design policies. The study concludes that consideration of culture as a fourth dimension is essential to accomplish sustainable development. The study recommends further investigation in the research domain to understand, develop and validate region-specific indicators for culture in the sustainable built environment and opens up the scope for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Source: Bibliometrix)

Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are incredibly thankful for the support rendered by Ar. Arathi Kanmani and Ar. Niyatha Balan in collecting the case study details. The authors are also grateful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful suggestions, which helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Lazar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Figs. 15, 16, 17 and 18.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Source: Adapted from (Thatcher, 2013)

Three pillars of sustainable development.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Source: Adapted from (UNESCO, Barcelona Cultura and UCLG, 2009)

Triangle of sustainable development.

Fig. 17
figure 17

Source: Adapted from (Adams, 2006)

Interlocking circles of sustainable development.

Fig. 18
figure 18

Source: Adapted from (Scott Cato, 2009)

Nested circles of sustainable development.

Appendix B

See Figs. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Source: Adapted from (New Zealand Ministry for Culture & Heritage, 2006)

Four well-beings of community sustainability.

Fig. 20
figure 20

Source: Adapted from (Nurse, 2006)

Culture as the central pillar.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Source: Adapted from (UNESCO, Barcelona Cultura and UCLG, 2009)

The new square of sustainable development.

Fig. 22
figure 22

Source: Adapted from (Institute for Planning and Design, 2009)

Sustainability model, Municipality of Chester.

Fig. 23
figure 23

Source: Adapted from (City of Grand Forks, 2008)

The stool of sustainable development.

Fig. 24
figure 24

Source: Adapted from (James et al., 2015)

The circles of sustainability.

Fig. 25
figure 25

Source: Adapted from (Dessein et al., 2015)

a Culture in sustainable development, (b) culture for sustainable development, (c) culture as sustainable development.

Appendix C

See Figs. 26, 27.

Fig. 26
figure 26

Source: Adapted from (Boschi, 1997)

The social, cultural, economic and ecological dimension of sustainability.

Fig. 27
figure 27

Source: Adapted from (Opoku, 2015)

Role of culture in the sustainable built environment.

Appendix D

  1. 1.

    A. Bahauddin, S. Hardono, A. Abdullah, and N. Z. Maliki, “The minangkabau house -a vision of sustainable culture and architecture,” International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 311–324, 2013.

  2. 2.

    A. Yates, “On nature, culture and sustainable design,” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 114, pp. 191–200, 2008.

  3. 3.

    B. A. Kazimee, “Learning from vernacular architecture: Sustainability and cultural conformity,” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 113, pp. 3–13, 2008.

  4. 4.

    B. A. Kazimee, “Representation of vernacular architecture and lesons for sustainable and culturally responsive environment,” International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 337–350, 2009.

  5. 5.

    E. Conte, “Sustainability and Cultural Capital: an Opportunity To Improve the Built Environment,” European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 235–245, 2017.

  6. 6.

    I. Özbek Eren, “Can place-attachment provide cultural sustainability? Empirical research on Turkish neighborhoods ‘mahalle’ ,” A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 138–158, 2013.

  7. 7.

    J. Hill and W. Woodland, “Subterranean Settlements in Southern Tunisia : Environmental and Cultural Controls on Morphology , Community Dynamics and Sustainability,” Geography, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 23–39, 2003.

  8. 8.

    J. Mehdinezhad and R. N. Nabi, “Investigating cultural and social sustainability in renovation and durability of vernacular buildings of Iran’s architecture (case study: Bazaar of tabriz),” IIOAB Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 486–495, 2016.

  9. 9.

    K. Galal-Ahmed, “Achieving socio-cultural sustainability in the design of the government-sponsored single family houses in the UAE: The case of Al Ain,” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 129, pp. 139–151, 2010.

  10. 10.

    K. Galal Ahmed, “Evaluation of social and cultural sustainability in typical public house models in Al Ain, UAE,” International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–80, 2011.

  11. 11.

    L. Oorschot et al., “Flagships of the dutch welfare state in transformation: A transformation framework for balancing sustainability and cultural values in energy-efficient renovation of postwar walk-up apartment buildings,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 7, 2018.

  12. 12.

    M. S. Chalhoub, “Cultural heritage in sustainable development: Stone houses as environmental assets in the East Mediterranean,” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 30–46, 2018.

  13. 13.

    M. Siamakpour, “Sustainable Design of a High-rise Residential Complex in Shiraz with an Approach Enhancing Cultural Interactions,” International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 371–384, 2018.

  14. 14.

    P. Memmott and C. Keys, “Redefining architecture to accommodate cultural difference: Designing for cultural sustainability,” Architectural Science Review, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 278–289, 2015.

  15. 15.

    R. L. H. Chiu, “Socio-cultural sustainability of housing: A conceptual exploration,” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 2004.

  16. 16.

    S. Guy, “Cultures of architecture and sustainability,” Building Research and Information, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 468–471, 2005.

  17. 17.

    S. M. Hegazy, “Cultural Sustainability between Traditional and Contemporary Omani Residences – A Comparative Case Study,” European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 185–194, 2015.

  18. 18.

    S. R. Wu, P. Fan, and J. Chen, “Incorporating Culture Into Sustainable Development: A Cultural Sustainability Index Framework for Green Buildings,” Sustainable Development, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 64–76, 2015.

  19. 19.

    W. Semple, “Traditional Architecture in Tibet: Linking Issues of Environmental and Cultural Sustainability,” Mountain Research and Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazar, N., Chithra, K. Role of culture in sustainable development and sustainable built environment: a review. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 5991–6031 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01691-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01691-8

Keywords

Navigation