Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors affecting industrial land use efficiency in China: analysis from government and land market

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s economy has a typical characteristic that the government has a strong control of enormous productive resources, such as the land resources. Industrial land use is greatly influenced by institutional factors that refer to the market means and government control. But little empirical researches have focused on the performances of government incentives and land market in industrial land use efficiency (ILUE). Based on the geographically and temporally weighted regression model, this study reveals the spatial and temporal role of government incentives and land market on ILUE in China from 2007 to 2015. The results show that the ILUE has spatial and temporal differences in different cities, showing a significant increasing trend from 2007 to 2015. The land transfer fund, land added tax, and official promotion incentive have a negative impact on the ILUE of most cities in 2015. There are significant temporal and spatial variations in the effect of land marketization, land price, the proportion of stock land and the proportion of unused land on ILUE between cities. Finally, this paper provides some policy implications according to the results obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. "Hu line" is proposed by Hu Huanyong in 1935 to divide the population density of China. This line is from Aihun county in Heilongjiang Province to Tengchong city in Yunnan Province.

References

  • Bao, J., Gao, S., & Ge, J. (2019). Dynamic land use and its policy in response to environmental and social-economic changes in China: A case study of the Jiangsu coast (1750–2015). Land Use Policy, 82, 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, J. A., Bragança, L., & Mateus, R. (2015). Assessment of land use efficiency using BSA tools development of a new index. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(2), 04014020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben, T. M., & Wang, K. (2011). Interaction analysis among industrial parks, innovation input, and urban production efficiency. Asian Journal of Social Science, 7(5), 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. V. D., Neumann, K., Vuuren, D. P. V., Bouwman, A. F., Kram, T., & Bakkes, J. (2016). Exploring resource efficiency for energy, land and phosphorus use: Implications for resource scarcity and the global environment. Global Environmental Change, 36, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, H., Henderson, J. V., & Zhang, Q. (2013). China’s land market auctions: Evidence of corruption? The Rand Journal of Economics, 44(3), 488–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., & Kung, J.K.-S. (2016). Do land revenue windfalls create a political resource curse? Evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 123(1), 86–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., He, R., & Wu, Q. (2017). A novel efficiency measure model for industrial land use based on subvector data envelope analysis and spatial analysis method. Complexity, 10, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Shen, Y., & Wang, Y. N. (2018). Does industrial land price lead to industrial diffusion in China? An empirical study from a spatial perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Shen, Y., Wang, Y. N., & Wu, Q. (2018a). How do industrial land price variations affect industrial diffusion? Evidence from a spatial analysis of China. Land Use Policy., 71, 384–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Shen, Y., Wang, Y. N., & Wu, Q. (2018b). The effect of industrial relocation on industrial land use efficiency in China: A spatial econometrics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Xu, G., & Tian, Z. (2016). Built-up land efficiency in urban China: Insights from the general land use plan (2006–2020). Habitat International, 51, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Wang, Q., & Huang, X. (2015). Can land market development suppress illegal land use in china? Habitat International, 49, 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F. F., & Huang, Y. (2004). Uneven land reform and urban sprawl in China: The case of Beijing. Progress in Planning, 61, 211–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., & Gibson, J. (2018). Sustainable land use management for improving land ecoefficiency: A case study of Hebei China. Annals of Operations Research, 290(2017), 1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J. F., & Peiser, R. B. (2014). Land supply, pricing and local governments’ land hoarding in China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J. F., Thill, J. C. F., Peiser, R., & Feng, C. C. (2014). Urban land market and land-use changes in post-reform China: A case study of Beijing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H., Gu, Q., & Zhou, L.-A. (2019). The gradients of power: Evidence from the Chinese housing market. Journal of Public Economics, 176(1), 32–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. E. (1996). Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28(4), 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, W., Zhang, Y., Cai, J., & Ma, E. (2019). Does urban industrial agglomeration lead to the improvement of land use efficiency in China? An empirical study from a spatial perspective. Sustainability, 11, 986.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, C., Zhou, Y., & Huang, Z. (2016). Fiscal decentralization, political centralization, and land urbanization in China. Urban Geography, 37, 436–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Q. Q., & Huang, B. (2018). Satellite-based mapping of daily high-resolution ground pm 2.5 in china via space-time regression modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 206, 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A., Nguyen, T. T., Ausseil, A. G. E., Maharjan, G. R., Dymond, J. R., Arnhold, S., et al. (2018). Assessing resource-use efficiency of land use. Environmental Modeling Software, 107, 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., Wu, B., & Barry, M. (2010). Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24, 383–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, D. Q., Hong, L. X., & Liang, J. S. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of industrial land efficiency and intensive use in Fujian Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(4), 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z., & Du, X. (2017). Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China. Cities, 60, 323–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. J., He, C. F., & Zhu, S. G. (2017). Do China’s economic development zones improve land use efficiency? The effects of selection, factor accumulation and agglomeration. Landscape Urban Planning, 162, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Deng, X. Z., & Seto, K. C. (2012). Multi-level modeling of urban expansion and cultivated land conversion for urban hotspot counties in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 108(2–4), 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, A. Q. (2018). The Research on the Impact of Land Transaction Methods on Land Prices. Price, Theory and Practice, 1, 65–69. ((In Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian, H. P., Li, H., & Ko, K. (2019). Market-led transactions and illegal land use: Evidence from China. Land Use Policy, 84(2019), 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., Qin, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhu, H. (2020). Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? evidence from china’s industrial land market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 81, 103501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Jin, X. B., Xu, W. B., Gu, Z. M., Yang, Y. H., Ren, J., et al. (2020). A new framework of land use efficiency for the coordination among food, economy and ecology in regional development. Science of the Total Environment, 710, 135670.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., & Lu, Y. (2015). Firm investment and exporting: Evidence from China’s value-added tax reform. Journal of International Economics, 97(2), 392–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Fan, P., Yue, W., & Song, Y. (2018). Impacts of land finance on urban sprawl in China: The case of Chongqing. Land Use Policy, 72, 420–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. Z., & Alm, J. (2016). “Province-Managing-County” fiscal reform, land expansion, and urban growth in China. Journal of Housing Economics, 33, 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Kuang, B., & Li, J. (2018). Regional difference decomposition and policy implications of China’s urban land use efficiency under the environmental restriction. Habitat International, 77, 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. H., Jiang, X., & Gong, M. Q. (2020). How land transfer marketization influence on green total factor productivity from the approach of industrial structure? Evidence from China. Land Use Policy, 95, 104610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, N. S., & Peng, Y. (2016). The space-time analysis of urban industrial land use and the effects of the local government competition in China. China Land Sciences, 30(5), 62–71. ((In Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. L., Zhang, J. Y., Ding, C., & Wang, Y. P. (2018). A geographically and temporally weighted regression model to explore the spatiotemporal influence of built environment on transit ridership. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 70, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini, E., Tomao, A., Barbati, A., Corona, P., Serra, P., & Salvati, L. (2018). Urban growth, landuse efficiency and local socioeconomic context: A comparative analysis of 417 metropolitan regions in Europe. Environmental Managment, 63(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • MHRDC (Ministry of Housing and Rural-Urban Development of China). (2007–2015). China urban construction statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Planning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho, V., Madaleno, M., & Robaina, M. (2017). The economic and environmental efficiency assessment in EU cross-country: Evidence from DEA and quantile regression approach. Ecological Indicators, 78, 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H. (2019). Relationship among land price, entrepreneurship, the environment, economics, and social factors in the value assessment of Japanese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC. (2014). China land and resources statistical yearbook. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). (2008–2016). China city statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opper, S., Nee, V., & Brehm, S. (2015). Homophily in the career mobility of China’s political elite. Social Science Research, 54, 332–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, C., Song, M. L., & Han, F. (2017). Urban economic structure, technological externalities, and intensive land use in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, C., Xiao, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2017). Economic structure and environmental quality and their impact on changing land use efficiency in China. Frontiers of Earth Science., 11(2), 372–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pu, Z. N., & Fu, J. S. (2018). Economic growth, environmental sustainability and China mayors’ promotion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172(20), 454–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robaina, A. M., Moutinho, V., & Macedo, P. (2015). A new frontier approach to model the ecoefficiency in European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 562–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council. (2006). National Standards for the minimum transfer prices of land for industrial purposes. Instrumentalities of the State Council, Ministry of Land & Resources.

  • Stull, W. J. (1974). Land zoning in urban economy. The American Economic Review, 64, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. F., Ma, A. B., Su, H. R., Su, S. L., Chen, F., Wang, W., & Weng, M. (2020). Does the establishment of development zones really improve industrial land use efficiency? Implications for China’s high-quality development policy. Land Use Policy, 90, 104265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, F., Yu, X. F., & Ruan, J. Q. (2014). Industrial land use efficiency under government intervention: Evidence from Hangzhou. China. Habitat International, 43(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2016). Government Intervention and Land Price Distortion: Based on a National-wide Parcel-level Dataset. China Economic Studies, 5, 29–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., Wei, Y., Huang, X., & Chen, B. (2017). Economic transition, spatial development and urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta. China. Habitat International, 63, 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. S., Li, B., Nie, Q. L., & Chen, C. (2017). Government expenditure, corruption and total factor productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 279–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Heerink, N. (2016). Foreign direct investment, fiscal decentralization and land conflicts in China. China Economic Review, 38, 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H., Chen, Q., Lu, F., Wang, W., Yao, G., & Yu, J. (2019). Spatial-temporal disparities and influencing factors of total-factor green use efficiency of industrial land in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1047–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H. L., Wang, W., Yang, Z. H., & Choi, Y. K. (2016). Measuring the sustainable performance of industrial land utilization in major industrial zones of China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, L., Huang, X., Yang, H., Chen, Z., Zhong, T., & Xie, Z. (2018). Effects of dual land ownerships and different land lease terms on industrial land use efficiency in Wuxi City, East China. Habitat International, 78, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, G., Lin, Z., Jiang, X., Qiu, M., & Sun, J. (2019). How do the industrial land use intensity and dominant industries guide the urban land use? evidences from 19 industrial land categories in ten cities of china. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. (2015). A comprehensive evaluation of industrial land intensive use in Hubei Province Based on typical industrial enterprises. Journal of Resource Ecology, 6, 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2018). Public governance and corporate fraud: Evidence from the recent anticorruption campaign in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 375–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Gao, Y., Fu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2007). Why Does China Enjoy So Much Better Physical Infrastructure? Economic Research Journal, 3, 4–19. ((In Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Sun, Z., & Zhang, M. (2014). The dynamic measurement of urban land use efficiency in China and influencing factors-based on DEA-Tobit two-stage methods. Mathematics Inpractice and Theory, 44(11), 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Gao, Y. Y., & Xu, X. X. (2013). Land Transfer under the Collusion of Government and Enterprise. Management World, 12, 43–62. ((In Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. L., Yue, W. Z., Liu, Y., Fan, P. L., & Wei, Y. H. D. (2018). Suburban industrial land development in transitional China: Spatial restructuring and determinants. Cities, 78, 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T. (2000). Land market forces and government’s role in sprawl: The case of China. Cities, 17(2), 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Bao, H., & Skitmore, M. (2015). The land hoarding and land inspector dilemma in China: An evolutionary game theoretic perspective. Habitat International, 46, 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, R. J., Chen, J., Feng, C., & Zhong, S. H. (2020). The impact of anti-corruption measures on land supply and the associated implications: The case of China. Land Use Policy, 95, 104605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L., Tian, L., Gao, Y., Lin, Y. K., Fan, C. J., Hou, D., et al. (2019). How did industrial land supply respond to transitions in state strategy? An analysis of prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2016. Land Use Policy, 87, 104009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, W., Zhao, J., & Wu, Q. (2014). Impact of property tax on land use behavior of industries: Evidences from typical industrial enterprises in Jiangsu province. China Land Science, 28, 60–67. ((In Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72074181); National Social Science Foundation of China (20CJY023); Project of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China (18XJC790014); Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2019JQ-350); Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2019S001); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M653780). The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and corrections on the earlier draft of our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Chen, W. et al. Factors affecting industrial land use efficiency in China: analysis from government and land market. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 10973–10993 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01100-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01100-6

Keywords

Navigation