Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable wetland management through bridging the communication gap between conservation projects and local communities

  • Case study
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local community engagement in conservation plays a fundamental role in sustainable management of natural resources. However, environmental conservation programs sometimes fail to effectively address and involve indigenous people. In the case of Gharagheshlagh wetland, bordering Urmia Lake in the northwest of Iran, several conservation projects have been conducted, but their efforts have not led to tangible and long-lasting outcomes. The absence of full integration of the locals seems to be a major reason, and this study examined the causes of this failure. Several factors and criteria that could possibly influence the likely communication gap between the conservation projects and the locals in the study area were identified. The importance of the criteria was evaluated by 380 questionnaires distributed in the community. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using Friedman and T tests. According to the results, the project teams did not communicate with the locals in a satisfactory manner. The respondents did not believe in the efficient performance and honesty of the teams. They believed that the lack of transparency played the most significant role in causing the communication gap. The lack of informing and providing feedback about the findings was the most important external and the respondents’ low perspective on the project teams was the major internal obstacle for a successful communication. Providing feedback mechanisms, continuous presence until achieving tangible results, creating economic incentives for the locals and applying flexible approaches of public involvement were proposed as the necessary measures that conservation projects should take into consideration for filling the communication gap with the local community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Adapted from: Arnstein (1969), Basco-Carrera et al. (2017)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, J. S., Domit, C., & Zappes, C. A. (2017). Is there dialogue between researchers and traditional community members? The importance of integration between traditional knowledge and scientific knowledge to coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 141, 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh-Choobar, O., Ahmadi-Givi, F., Mirzaei, N., & Owlad, E. (2016). Climate change and anthropogenic impacts on the rapid shrinkage of Lake Urmia. International Journal of Climatology, 36, 4276–4286.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, S., & Verhoeven, J. (2019). Wetland functions and ecosystem services: Implications for wetland restoration and wise use. In S. An & J. Verhoeven (Eds.), Wetlands: Ecosystem services, restoration and wise use. Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis) (Vol. 238, pp. 1–10). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, D. (2018). Protection of traditional knowledge and indigenous knowledge. Singapore: South Asia Economic and Policy Studies. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basco-Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., & Jonoski, A. (2017). Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 91, 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnken, J. A., Groninger, J. W., & Akamani, K. (2016). Institutional constraints to collaborative ecosystem management within a wetlands conservation partnership. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 158, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2003). Alternatives to conventional management: lessons from small-scale fisheries. Environments, 31(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 104(39), 15188–15193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, H. N., Jr., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, R. E., & Riley, C. (2003). Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 46(3), 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J., Waylen, K. A., & Mulder, M. B. (2013). Assessing community-based conservation projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes. Environmental Evidence, 2(2), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2002). Innovations for conservation and development. The Geographical Journal, 168(1), 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfucura, E. (2018). Governance, land and distribution: A discussion on the political economy of community-based conservation. Ecological Economics, 145, 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L. M., & Vainio-Mattila, A. (2003). Participatory development and community-based conservation: Opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology, 31(3), 417–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Ghosh, A., & Kar, S. (2015). Assessment of environmental factors causing wetland degradation, using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process: A case study on Keoladeo National Park, India. Ecological Modelling, 316, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Chang, Y., & Chen, K. (2014). Integrated wetland management: An analysis with group model building based on system dynamics model. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chunhabunyatip, P., Sasaki, N., Grünbühel, C., Kuwornu, J., & Tsusaka, T. (2018). Influence of indigenous spiritual beliefs on natural resource management and ecological conservation in Thailand. Sustainability, 10(8), 2842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, M. N., Ishwar, N. M., Sumra, I., & Vyas, P. (2017). Participatory wetland management: a solution to conservation challenges in the sundarbans biosphere reserve. In B. Prusty, R. Chandra, & P. Azeez (Eds.), Wetland science (pp. 575–587). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashti, S., Sabzghabaei, G. R., & Jafari Azar, S. (2018). Strategic planning of environmental protection in wetland ecosystems (case study: Ghareh Gheshlagh wetland watershed). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering (JISE), 41(3), 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, K. L. (2009). Wetlands and global climate change: The role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 17(1), 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fengqin, Y., & Shuwen, Z. (2019). Ecosystem service decline in response to wetland loss in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Ecological Engineering, 130, 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. (2012). Tourism and the politics of the global land grab in Tanzania: markets, appropriation and recognition. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 377–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghale, Y. A. G., Baykara, M., & Unal, A. (2019). Investigating the interaction between agricultural lands and Urmia Lake ecosystem using remote sensing techniques and hydro-climatic data analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 221, 566–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, A., Shackleton, C. M., & Gambiza, J. (2017). Community-based natural resource use and management of Bigodi Wetland Sanctuary, Uganda, for livelihood benefits. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 25(6), 717–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. S. (2010). Key principles of community-based natural resource management: A synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environmental Management, 45(1), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRDoE., & CIWP. (2011). National Wetland Conservation Strategy and Action Plan. Tehran: Department of Environment with the assistance of the Conservation of Iranian Wetlands Conservation Project.

  • Janssen, R., Goosen, H., Verhoeven, M. L., Verhoeven, J., Omtzigt, A., & Maltby, E. (2005). Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20(2), 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough, H. L., & Blahna, D. J. (2006). Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conservation Biology, 20(5), 1373–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford, R. T., Basset, A., & Jacks, L. (2016). Wetlands: Conservation’s poor cousins. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 26, 892–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konisky, D. M., & Beierle, T. C. (2011). Innovations in public participation and environmental decision making: Examples from the Great Lakes region. Society & Natural Resources, 14(9), 815–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamsal, P., Atreya, K., Pant, K. P., & Kumar, L. (2015). An analysis of willingness to pay for community-based conservation activities at the Ghodaghodi Lake Complex, Nepal. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 11(4), 341–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. S., & Richmond, L. S. (2014). Examining enabling conditions for community-based fisheries comanagement: Comparing efforts in Hawai‘i and American Samoa. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140(22), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi, A. (2012). Lake Uromiyeh A Concise Baseline Report. Conservation of Iranian Wetlands Project. IRI Department of Environment, United Nations Development Porgramme, Global Environment Facilities.

  • Maleki, S., Soffianian, A. R., Soltani Koupaei, S., Baghdadi, N., EL-Hajj, M., & Sheikholeslam, F. (2019). Wetland Restoration Prioritization Using Artificial Neural Networks. Wetlands, pp. 1–14.

  • McCauley, L. A., Anteau, M. J., van der Burg, M. P., & Wiltermuth, M. T. (2015). Land use and wetland drainage affect water levels and dynamics of remaining wetlands. Ecosphere, 6(6), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newas, M. W., & Rahman, S. (2019). Wetland resource governance in Bangladesh: An analysis of community-based co-management approach. Environmental Development (in press).

  • Nguyen, H. H., Dargusch, P., Moss, P., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2017). Land-use change and socio-ecological drivers of wetland conversion in Ha Tien Plain, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 64, 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, D., Baxter, G., Butler, J., & McAlpine, C. A. (2016). How do community-based conservation programs in developing countries change human behaviour? A realist synthesis. Biological Conservation, 200, 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Conner, B. (2003). Protecting traditional knowledge an overview of a developing area of intellectual property law. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 6(5), 677–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, E. F., Decker, D. J., Siemer, W. F., Kirsch, A., Hurst, J., & Farquhar, J. (2014). Challenges for multilevel stakeholder engagement in public trust resource governance. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 448–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo-Ros, J., Ribas, A., & Fraguell, R. M. (2019). A cultural approach to wetlands restoration to assess its public acceptance. Restoration Ecology, 27, 626–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., Sun, G., Luo, C., Zeng, X., Zhang, H., Murray, N. J., et al. (2019). Identifying restoration priorities for wetlands based on historical distributions of biodiversity features and restoration suitability. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 1222–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendigs, A., Reibelt, L. M., Ralainasolo, F. B., Ratsimbazafy, J. H., & Waeber, P. O. (2015). Ten years into the marshes—Hapalemur alaotrensis conservation, one step forward and two steps back? Madagascar Conservation and Development, 10(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. R., Arlettaz, R., Schaub, M., Lüscher, B., & Kröpfli, M. (2019). Benefits and limits of comparative effectiveness studies in evidence-based conservation. Biological Conservation, 236, 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, S., Todorova, M., van Teeffelen, A., & Verburg, P. H. (2016). Public support for wetland restoration: What is the link with ecosystem service values? Wetlands, 36, 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuyt, K. D. (2005). Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa. Ecological Economics, 53, 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sica, Y. V., Quintana, R. D., Radeloff, V. C., & Gavier-Pizarro, G. I. (2016). Wetland loss due to land use change in the Lower Paraná River Delta, Argentina. Science of the Total Environment, 568, 967–978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Center of Iran, 2016. Population and Housing Censuse, s.l.

  • Takeda, L., & Røpke, I. (2010). Power and contestation in collaborative ecosystem-based management: The case of Haida Gwaii. Ecological Economics, 70, 178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terer, T., Ndiritu, G. G., & Gichuki, N. N. (2004). Socio-economic values and traditional strategies of managing wetland resources in Lower Tana River, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 527(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, S. K., & Upadhyay, R. K. (2017). Conservation of degraded wetland system of Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, India. Ecological Complexity, 32(A), 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. A., Addison, J., Arias, A., Bergseth, B. J., Marshall, N. A., Morrison, T. H., et al. (2016). Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ULRP. (2015). Investigating the land use changes in Urmia Lake Basin using satellite images. Tehran: Urmia Lake Restoration Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2019). Conservation of Iranian Wetlands Project—Phase II (Scale-up). Retrieved from UNDP Iran: https://www.ir.undp.org/content/iran/en/home/projects/Conservation-of-Iranian-Wetlands-Project-PhaseII-Scale-up.html.

  • Valdez, V. C., Ruiz-Luna, A., & Berlanga-Robles, C. A. (2016). Effects of land use changes on ecosystem services value provided by coastal wetlands: Recent and future landscape scenarios. Journal of Coastal Zone Management, 19(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varjavand, H., Mojtahedi, M., & Arabpour Dahouei, F. (2016). Integrated Watershed Management of Ghara-gheshlagh Wetland and Baseline Studies. Tehran: Paris.

  • Vinten, A., Kuhfussa, L., Shortalla, O., Stockan, J., Ibiyemi, A., Pohle, I., et al. (2019). Water for all: Towards an integrated approach to wetland conservation and flood risk reduction in a lowland catchment in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 881–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. W., Dodd, A., Kuo, P. H., & LePage, B. (2018). Science as a bridge in communicating needs and implementing changes towards wetland conservation in Taiwan. Wetlands, 38(6), 1223–1232.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., René, A., de Roland, L., Rabearivony, J., & Thorstrom, R. (2007). Community-based wetland conservation protects endangered species in Madagascar: Lessons from science and conservation. Banwa, 4(1), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, R., Webb, M. E., & Langen, T. A. (2018). Factors affecting landowner enrollment in wetland restoration in northeastern New York State. Land Use Policy, 76, 679–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youneszadeh Jalili, S., Kamali, M., & Daneshkar Arasteh, P. (2016). Analytical study of land use changes (irrigated agriculture) in the watershed of Lake Urmia using landsat imagery. Journal of Sciences and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 20(78), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. C., Searle, K., Butler, A., Simmons, P., Watt, A. D., & Jordan, A. (2016). The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biological Conservation, 195, 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. W., & Ma, J. Z. (2011). Waterbirds as bioindicators of wetland heavy metal pollution. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10(C), 2769–2774.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, Y., Wang, L., Xue, Z., Mingju, E., Jiang, M., Lu, X., Yang, S., Shen, X., Liu, Z., Sun, G., & Yu, X. (2018). Impacts of agricultural and reclamation practices on wetlands in the Amur River Basin, Northeastern China. Wetlands, 38, 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0975-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, No 15., Ghods Street, Engheleb Ave, Tehran, Iran

    Lobat Zebardast, Saeed Akbarpour & Hamid Reza Jafari

  2. Department of Environment (DoE), Tehran, Iran

    Masoud Bagherzadeh Karimi

Authors
  1. Lobat Zebardast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saeed Akbarpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hamid Reza Jafari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masoud Bagherzadeh Karimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lobat Zebardast.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zebardast, L., Akbarpour, S., Jafari, H.R. et al. Sustainable wetland management through bridging the communication gap between conservation projects and local communities. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 11098–11119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01082-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01082-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation