Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive evaluation of ecological environment quality of mining area based on sustainable development indicators: a case study of Yanzhou Mining in China

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to explore the effective method for the comprehensive evaluation of ecological environment quality of environmental pollution governance in China’s coal mining areas, based on the review of domestic and foreign research literature and the requirements and actual situation of environmental pollution control in China’s coal mining areas, this paper selects four categories of 20 evaluation indicators, including land resource, water resource, air, and sustainable development status. According to the land, surface water, air quality standards, and China’s sustainable development strategy issued by the Chinese government, and drawing on the latest research results at China and the world, taking the Yanzhou Mining in China as an example, the traditional niche model is introduced to reconstruct the spatial niche model for the case evaluation. It is found that the evaluation results of the spatial niche model lie between the evaluation results of the absolute niche model and the relative niche model. According to the evaluation results, during 2010–2018, the quality of land resources, water resources, and sustainable development in Yanzhou Mining has been upgraded from level IV to II, and the air quality has been upgraded from level IV to level III, which is still the focus of improving the ecological environment quality in Yanzhou Mining. The research findings are significant for guiding the Yanzhou Mining to improve the quality of the ecological environment and promote sustainable development. The conclusion of this paper has guiding significance for the improvement of ecological environment quality of other similar coal mining areas and provides empirical support for the government to formulate environmental pollution governance and ecological environment quality policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials in this paper are included in the paper and the annex.

References

  • Bai, S. W., Hua, Q. S., Cheng, L. J., Wang, Q. Y., & Elwert, T. (2019). Improve sustainability of stone mining region in developing countries based on cleaner production evaluation: Methodology and a case study in Laizhou region of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 929–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. (1982). Building a sustainable society. Society, 7, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindanr, D., & Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior. The case of the United Nations Global. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Hou, K., Wu, Y. P., Li, X. X., & Zhang, J. L. (2019). A conceptual framework for establishing the index system of ecological environment evaluation–A case study of the upper Hanjiang River, China. Ecological Indicators, 107, 105568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C., Geng, Y. J., & Wang, X. H. (2015). Application of the improved analytic hierarchy process in determination of indicator weight of eco-environment quality evaluation in Huainan Mining Area. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 43(4), 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. X., Jiang, X. S., Wang, Y., & Zhuang, D. F. (2018). Based on GIS mining soil heavy metal ecological environment and human health evaluation. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 4, 1642–1652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. Q. (1989). Environmental prediction and comprehensive improvement of coal mine subsidence area. Energy Environmental Protection, 1, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. G., Zhang, P., & Liu, Z. J. (2006). Quality evaluation theory and warning method of environment in coal mine. Coal Science and Technology, 34(9), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.13199/j.cst.2006.09.60.chengjg.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danthurebandara, M., Passel, S. V., Machiels, L., & Acker, K. V. (2015). Valorization of thermal treatment residues in Enhanced Landfill Mining: Environmental and economic evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 275–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De, A. R. D., Oberholster, P. J., van Wyk, J. H. V., Truter, J. C., Schaefer, L. M., & Botha, A. M. (2016). The effect of rehabilitation measures on ecological infrastructure in response to acid mine drainage from coal mining. Ecological Engineering, 95, 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L. J., Shu, W. W., Li, X. B., & Zhang, J. M. (2018). Quantitative evaluation and case studies of cleaner mining with multiple indexes considering uncertainty factors for phosphorus mines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 319–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, D. L. (1995). Policies for the planning and reclamation of coal-mined landscapes: An International Comparison. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38(4), 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gago, R. F., & Antolin, M. N. (2004). Stakeholder Salience in corporate environmental strategy. Corporate Governance, 4(3), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinell, J. (1917). The niche relationship of the California thrasher. Auk, 34, 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J. J., Yu, S. W., Xiong, H., & Lu, X. C. (2011). The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of ecological environment quality in coal mine region based on analytic hierarchy process method. Science and Technology Management Research, 15, 51–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, C. Y., Chen, Q. J., & Pan, Y. Q. (2013). Research on farmland ecological niche change in mining areas: With Yulin City, Shanxi Province as an example. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 30(5), 35–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He, F. H., Gu, L. J., Wang, T., & Zhang, Z. H. (2017). The synthetic geo-ecological environmental evaluation of a coastal coal-mining city using spatiotemporal big data: A case study in Longkou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(2), 854–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, D. (2001). Sustainable development can the mining industry afford it. Resources Policy, 27(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. H., Hu, Z. Q., Xia, Q., Xin, K., Xu, R. Q., Fu, X., et al. (2012). Analysis of ecological environment quality of resource-exhausted mining areas based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 40(11), 213–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. T., Wu, K. M., Lao, Z. L., Hu, W., & Hu, J. J. (2019). Assessment of trace metal contamination and ecological risk in the forest ecosystem of Dexingmining area in northeast Jiangxi Province, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 167, 76–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Zheng, Y. N., & Wang, X. H. (2014). A brief analysis on the construction of ecological environment quality evaluation index system in coal mine area. Journal of Agricultural Catastrophology, 2, 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Q. Q., & Huang, G. Q. (2018). Fuzzy stochastic system dynnmics evaluation model and its application in environment quality evaluation in minerals mining region. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 32(2), 170–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. A., Bai, Z. K., & Feng, L. R. (2007). Evaluation of the eco-environment quality and resources utilization in opencast coal mine area-A case study of Antaibao Open cast Mine of Pingshuo, Shanxi Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 15(5), 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, S., Maiti, S. K., & Masto, R. E. (2014). Development of mine soil quality index (MSQI) for evaluation of reclamation success: A chronosequence study. Ecological Engineering, 71, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S. N., Li, B. W., & Nie, H. G. (2019). Comprehensive evaluation and obstacle analysis of sustainable development of China’s low carbon transformation. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 6, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, L. L., Wang, D. P., & Zhou, C. (2011). Sustainability evaluation of regional innovation system based on synthetic niche-fitness. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 31(5), 927–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, H. Y. (2011). Study on grey early warning system of ecological environment quality in regional mining area. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 6, 42–43 + 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnic, C. D. (1983). Federally required restoration of surface-mined property: Impasse between the coal industry and the environmentally consumed. Natural Resources Journal, 23, 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbula, S. M., Milosavljevic, J. S., Radojevic, A. A., Kalinovic, J. V., & Kalinovic, T. S. (2017). Extreme air pollution with contaminants originating from the mining–metallurgical processes. Science of the Total Environment, 586, 1066–1075.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Z. J. (1984). On the environmental pollution of coal mines. Coal Science and Technology, 7, 37–40 + 62. https://doi.org/10.13199/j.cst.1984.07.39.shanzhj.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowińska-Świerkosz, B. N. (2017). Application of surrogate measures of ecological quality assessment: The introduction of the Indicator of Ecological Landscape Quality (IELQ). Ecological Indicators, 73, 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q. X., & Hu, Z. Q. (2003). Negative influences on environment quality and sustainable development of mining industry in China. China Mining Magazine, 12(7), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Liu, J. P., & Luo, Q. (2017). A new perspective on the study of ecological environment structure in coal mining area. China Mining Magazine, 4, 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., Li, C. M., Lin, Z. J., & Lu, X. S. (2004). Design and realization of ecological environment quality assessment system based on a review. Energy Environmental Protection, 18(3), 50–52 + 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. F., Li, X. J., Hou, L., & Zhou, J. J. (2019). Evaluation on ecological suitability of coal mining collapse area in Jining. China Mining Magazine, 28(3), 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. Y., Zhang, J. S., & Yu, G. Z. (2012). Study on environment quality evaluation of coal mining area in ordos base on AHP. Coal Engineering, 8, 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, T. W., Turner, P. J., Durden, J. M., Jones, D. O. B., Weaver, P., & Van Dover, C. L. (2019). Ecological risk assessment for deep-sea mining. Ocean and Coastal Management, 176, 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B. S., & Webber, D. J. (1985). Promoting economic incentives for environmental protection in the surface mining control and reclamation act of 1977: An analysis of the design and implementation of reclamation performance bonds. Natural Resources Journal, 23, 385–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, L. Y., Kong, X. B., & Zhang, B. B. (2019). Construction and application of arable land quality evaluation system based on sustainable development demand. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 35(10), 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi, X. D., & Chu, J. N. (2010). An empirical study on ecological environment quality evaluation in mining area. Journal of Shandong Technology and Business University, 24(3), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., & Mi, G. F. (2012). Research on the evaluation model of the sustainable development of inner Mongolia’ s eco-environment. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 14(1), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zvarivadza, T. (2018). Sustainability in the mining industry: An evaluation of the National Planning Commission’s diagnostic overview. Resources Policy, 56, 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has received funding from the general project of national social science foundation of China: “Research on mechanism and supportive polices of environmental pollution cooperative governance in the process of regional integration development of the Yangtze river delta” (Approval number: 19BJL035). Thanks to the state philosophy and Social Sciences Program Office for funding this study, and thanks to the Yanzhou Mining Group for providing research data.

Funding

This work has received funding from the general project of national social science foundation of China: “Research on mechanism and supportive polices of environmental pollution cooperative governance in the process of regional integration development of the Yangtze river delta” (Approval Number: 19BJL035).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuyan Han.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable, since the present study is a re-evaluation of existing data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, X., Cao, T. & Yan, X. Comprehensive evaluation of ecological environment quality of mining area based on sustainable development indicators: a case study of Yanzhou Mining in China. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 7581–7605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00935-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00935-3

Keywords

Navigation