Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainability in environmental education: new strategic thinking

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently environmental education (EE) literature has been supportive of pluralistic rather than goal-oriented learning. Researchers argue that sustainability is not fixed but socially constructed and that sustainability issues should not be represented as indisputable targets. Countering this trend in environmental education research, this article argues that unsustainability should be treated as a concrete challenge that requires concrete solutions. The author will argue that there is a need for clear articulation of (1) what (un)sustainability is; (2) what are the key challenges of (un)sustainability; and (3) how the sustainability challenges can be meaningfully addressed. This article will outline a number of helpful frameworks that address obstacles to sustainability, ranging from population growth to unsustainable production and consumption practices. Solutions include investment in family planning to counter the effects of overpopulation, and alternative production frameworks, such as Cradle to Cradle that differs from the conventional frameworks. This article will conclude with the broader reflection that without goal-oriented critical learning explicitly providing sound models of sustainability, open learning may never permit transcendence from unsustainability. This article will develop a number of comprehensive frameworks targeted at solutions to sustainability issues both from ethical and practical perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayres, R. U., & Kneese, A. V. (1969). Production, consumption, and externalities. The American Economic Review, 59, 282–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M. (2013). Business and sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M. (2004). Retrieving nature. Education for a post-humanist age. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M. (2012). Environmental concern, moral education, and our place in nature. Journal of Moral Education. Special Issue: Moral Education and Environmental Concern, 41(3), 285–300.

  • Breiting, S. (2009). Issues for environmental education and ESD research development: Looking ahead from WEEC 2007 in Durban. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafaro, P., & Primrack, R. (2014). Species extinction is a great moral wrong. Biological Conservation, 170, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherniak, B. (2012). Critiquing the Role of Deliberative Democracy in EE and ESD: The Case for Effective Participation and Pragmatic Deliberation. Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences Master Thesis, Geotryckeriet.

  • Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle: Confronting the environmental crisis. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. (2012). Abundant Earth and Population. In P. Cafaro & E. Crist (Eds.), Life on the brink: Environmentalists confront overpopulation (pp. 141–153). Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.E. (1994). Sustainable Growth: An Impossibility Theorem. Clearinghouse Bulletin, April 1994, Carrying Capacity Network, Washington, D.C.

  • Eisenstein, C. (2014). Let’s be honest: real sustainability may not make business sense. The Guardian. January 8. http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/sustainability-business-sense-profit-purpose.

  • Engelman, R. (2012). Nine population strategies to stop short of 9 billion. In L. Starke (Ed.), State of the world 2012: Moving toward sustainable prosperity. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261, 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, H. (2004). Learning our way to a sustainable and desirable world: Ideas inspired by Arne Naess and deep ecology. In P. B. Corcoran & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise, and practice (pp. 131–148). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Gorski, P. C. (2009). Critical Ties: The Animal Rights Awakening of a Social Justice Educator. Available on-line http://www.edchange.org/publications/animal-rights-social-justice.pdf.

  • Graedel, T. E. (1996). On the concept of industrial ecology. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 21, 69–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (1993). The Ecology of Commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Why is biodiversity in crisis? http://www.iucn.org/iyb/about/biodiversity_crisis/.

  • IPCC. (2014). Fifth assessment Report http://www.ipcc.ch/.

  • Isenmann, R. (2003). Industrial ecology: shedding more light on its perspective of understanding nature as model. Sustainable Development, 11, 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jickling, B. (2005). Education and advocacy: A troubling relationship. In E. A. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 91–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jickling, B. and Wals, A. E. J. (2013). Probing Normative Research in Environmental Education: Ideas About Education and Ethics. In Robert B. Stevenson, Michael Brody, Justin Dillon, Arjen E.J. Wals (eds), International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education (pp. 74-87).

  • Kaplan, S. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. (2014). “New conservation” as a moral imperative. Conservation Biology,. doi:10.1111/cobi.12294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H. (2011). Consumption in environmental education: developing curriculum that addresses Cradle to Cradle principles. Factis Pax, 5(3), 374–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H. (2013). The grand old theory of human nature and environmental problems. Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 16(1), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H., & Blewitt, J. (2014). Sustainable business: Key issues. New York: Routledge Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaChapelle, D. (1991). Educating for deep ecology. Journal of Experiential Education, 14, 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, W. F., Sayer, J., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, I. (2002). The Need for Environment Literacy, http://www.staff.vu.edu.au/alnarc/onlineforum/AL_pap_lowe.htm.

  • Lyle, J. T. (1996). Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, R. (1995). Eco-Fascism: Ecocentric Environmentalism Pushes Radical Agendas to Achieve Its Goals http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/eco-fascism.

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntire-Strasburg, J. (2008). Robbing the Cradle to Cradle? William McDonough a Saint… and a Sinner. Blog post. http://sustainablog.org/2008/11/robbing-the-cradle-to-cradle-william-mcdonough-a-saint-and-a-sinner/.

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). Limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York City: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment http://www.maweb.org/en/index.aspx.

  • Miller, B., Soulé, M. E., & Terborgh, J. (2014). New conservation’ or surrender to development? Animal Conservation. doi:10.1111/acv.12129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L., Marginson, S., & Blackmore, J. (2014). Education and neoliberal globalization. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(3), 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep: Long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, G. (2010). The blue economy—10 years, 100 innovations and 100 million jobs a report to the club of Rome. Taos: Paradigm Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, G. (2011). From Deep Ecology to The Blue Economy: A review of the main concepts related to environmental, social and ethical business that contributed to the creation of The Blue Economy. ZERI.

  • Pinske, J., & Kolk, A. (2009). International business and global climate change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. (2009). The ecological crisis and self-delusion: implications for the building sector. Building Research and Information, 37(3), 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. (2010). What’s blocking sustainability? Human nature, cognition, and denial. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 6(2), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1986). A case for animal rights. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare science (pp. 179–189). Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, M., Root-Bernstein, M., & Root-Bernstein, R. (2014). Tools for thinking applied to nature provide an inclusive pedagogical framework for environmental education. Fauna & Flora International, Oryx, 3, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W. (2011). Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1080–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W. R. (1984). The Product-Life Factor. In S. G. Orr (Ed.), An inquiry into the nature of sustainable societies, the role of the private sector. Texas: HARC Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W. R., & Reday-Mulvey, G. (1981). Jobs for tomorrow: the potential for substituting manpower for energy. New York: Vantage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, M., & Brennan, G. (2015). Business and production solutions: Closing the loop. In H. Kopnina & E. Shoreman-Ouimet (Eds.), Sustainability: Key issues. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Belgrade Charter (1975). UNESCO-UNEP International Environmental Workshop, October 13–22, 1975.

  • The Economist. (2012). Climate Change: Theatre of the Absurd. December 1, P. 62.

  • UNEP. http://www.unep.org/.

  • Van Poeck, K., & Vandenabeele, J. (2012). Learning from sustainable development: education in the light of public issues. Environmental Education Research, 18(4), 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J. (2010). Between knowing what is right and knowing that it is wrong to tell others what is right: On relativism, uncertainty and democracy in environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J., & Jickling, B. (2002). ‘Sustainability’ in higher education: from doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, H. G. (2013). Human dependence on nature. New York: Routledge, Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, K. (2007). Hidden Sources: Understanding Natural Systems is the Key to an Evolving and Aspirational ESD. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Kopnina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kopnina, H. Sustainability in environmental education: new strategic thinking. Environ Dev Sustain 17, 987–1002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9584-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9584-z

Keywords

Navigation