Skip to main content
Log in

Do EU pesticide standards promote environmentally-friendly production of fresh export vegetables in developing countries? The evidence from Kenyan green bean industry

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developed countries are major markets for developing country fresh produce. Demand by developed country consumers for spotless produce has encouraged developing country consumers to rely increasingly on pesticides in producing fresh export vegetables. However developed country pesticide standards enacted in response to reports of increased farmer and farm worker pesticide poisoning and the food safety scandals of the 1980s and 1990s require changes in the way growers use pesticides. The EU has especially developed stringent food safety standards relating to, among other things, pesticide usage. Under EU pesticide standards (EU-PS) farmers are trained by their buyers on safe use of pesticides and then closely monitored under contract. This paper looks at the impact of these standards on developing country farmers’ use of alternative pest management practices, pesticide protective clothing and the actual usage of pesticides. It finds that compliance with EU-PS increases the use of alternative pest management practices and protective clothing. However, EU-PS has mixed effect on the quantity of pesticides used. The paper also finds that farmer’s education and access to information play an important role in the use of alternative pest management practices. The paper concludes that EU-PS encourage the use of alternative pest management practices and pesticide protective gear in production of fresh export vegetables. The findings imply that EU-PS promote environmentally-friendly methods of production of fresh export vegetables in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The public standards are the maximum pesticide residue limits while private protocols include industry retail standards (e.g., British Retail Consortium) and retailer-owned protocols such as Farm-to-Folk and Nature’s Choice, and voluntary GlobalGAP. See Jaffee (2003) for detailed discussion of these private and public food safety standards.

  2. See Jaffee (1995) and Dolan and Humphrey (2000) for a detailed history of Kenyan green bean industry. Readers interested in trends in green bean exports and likely effects of EU standards can find this in Okello (2005) and Okello et al. (2007).

  3. A copy of the questionnaire can be found in Appendix 1 of Okello (2005).

  4. See Jaffee (2003) and Freidberg (2004) for a discussion of the due diligence law and its effects on UK retailers’ behavior.

  5. The classification of WHO class 4 pesticides as un-harmful is based on acute toxicity and hence does not take into account the long-term chronic health effects that might arise from the use of these pesticides. This study focused only on the acute health effects induced by the use of pesticides.

  6. In this study a fallow was defined as leaving a plot untilled for a season (6 months) after a harvest of green beans.

  7. In a Poisson regression model, multiplying the coefficient by 100 yields expected percentage change in the dependent variable when the explanatory variable increases by a unit, other things equal (see Wooldridge, p. 547). For the logged variables, the coefficients are interpreted as elasticities.

  8. We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting the inclusion of this statement.

References

  • Antle, J. M., & Capalbo, S. M. (1994). Pesticides, productivity and farmer health: Implications for regulatory policy and agricultural research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 598–602. doi:10.2307/1243671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H. R., IIbery, B. W., Brown, A. W., & Binns, T. (1999). Globalization and changing networks of food supply: The importation of fresh horticultural produce from Kenya into UK. Transactions of the Institute of Geographers, 24(2), 159–174. doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00159.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuyno, L. C. M. (1999). An economic evaluation of health and environmental benefits of IPM program (IPM CRSP) in Philippines. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  • Cuyno, L., Norton, G., & Rola, A. (2001). Economic analysis of environmental benefits of integrated pest management: A Philippine case study. Agricultural Economics, 25, 227–233. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00203.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C., & Humphrey, J. (2000). Governance and trade in Fresh vegetables: The Impact of UK supermarkets on African horticultural industries. The Journal of Development Studies, 35, 147–177. doi:10.1080/713600072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidberg, S. (2004). French beans and food scares: Culture and commerce in an anxious age. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R. (2007). Regulatory risk and farmers’ caution with pesticides in Costa Rica. Transactions (Institute of British Geographers), 32(3), 377–394. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00256.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R. (2008). Pesticides in export and domestic agriculture: Reconsidering market orientation and pesticide use in Costa Rica. Geoforum, 39(3), 1378–1392. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, S. M. (1995). The many faces of success: The development of Kenyan horticultural exports. In S. Jaffee & J. Morton (Eds.), Marketing Africa’s high-value foods (pp. 319–374). Washington, D.C: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, S. (2003). From challenge to opportunity: The transformation of the Kenyan fresh vegetable trade in the context of emerging food safety and other standards. ARD Discussion Paper No. 1. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Labarta-Chavari, R. (2005). Essays on economic evaluation of integrated pest management extension in Nicaragua. PhD Dissertation, Michigan State University.

  • Maumbe, B. M., & Swinton, S. M. (2003). Hidden costs of pesticide use in Zimbabwe’s smallholder cotton growers. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1559–1571. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00016-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloh, N., & Otta, M. (2002). Export horticulture and poverty in Kenya. IDS Working Paper No. 174, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UK.

  • Mwanthi, M. A., & Kimani, V. N. (1990). Agrochemicals: a potential health hazard among Kenya’s small-scale farmers. In G. Forget, T. Goodman, & A. de Villiers (Eds.), Impact of pesticides on health in developing countries (pp. 21–34). Ottawa: IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohayo-Mitoko, G. J. A. (1997). Occupational pesticide exposure among Kenyan agricultural workers: An epidemiological and public health perspectives. PhD Dissertation, Wagenigen Agricultural University.

  • Okello, J. J. (2005). Compliance with international food safety standards: the case of green bean production in Kenyan family farms. PhD Dissertation, Michigan State University.

  • Okello, J. J., Narrod, C., & Roy, D. (2007). Food safety requirements in African green bean exports and their impact on small farmers. IFPRI Discussion paper No. 737, Washington, DC.

  • Okello, J. J., & Swinton, S. M. (2007). Compliance with international food safety standards in Kenya’s green bean industry: a paired case study of small and large family farms. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 269–285. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00342.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P. L., & Rogers, P. A. (1995). Impact of pesticides on farmer health and the rice environment. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prudent, P., Loko, S., Deybe, D., & Vaissayres, M. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of IPM by cotton farmers in Benin. Exploratory Agriculture, 43, 113–124. doi:10.1017/S0014479706004261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, J., & Thomas, D. (1998). Health, nutrition and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 82, 766–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A., Bergeron, G., & Waters, W. F. (1995). Bittersweet harvest for global supermarkets: Challenges in Latin America’s export boom. Greenwich: Natural Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2005). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. (South-western College Publishing).

  • World Health Organization. (2005). The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification 2004. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support for this research from The Rockefeller Foundation Fellowship, World Bank Consultancy, and Michigan State University’s Elton R. Smith Endowment, Department of Agricultural Economics and the Graduate School. We also thank Scott Swinton for providing extensive advice during this study and the preparation of earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julius J. Okello.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okello, J.J., Okello, R.M. Do EU pesticide standards promote environmentally-friendly production of fresh export vegetables in developing countries? The evidence from Kenyan green bean industry. Environ Dev Sustain 12, 341–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-009-9199-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-009-9199-y

Keywords

Navigation