Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influencing factors on sustainable development: a case study in Quang Tri province, Vietnam

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Sustainable development (SD) is a common concept. Knowledge and attitudes are essential in the SD process. This study assesses the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of local people about SD. Aim To study the factors that influence the understanding of the concept, contents, and indicators of different aspects affecting the health and environmental issues. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out from June to July 2007 among 546 households in the Quang Tri province. Data were gathered on basis of socio-demographic variables, namely age, gender, education, occupation, income, and region. Chi square tests and multivariate analysis were performed on the obtained data. The data were cleaned and analysed using SPSS 15.0 for windows. Results Occupation is related to knowledge, attitude, or practice. Income is related to knowledge or practice. Gender related to only attitude. Lastly, region is related to attitude or practice. The proportion of wrong understanding about SD is 2.0 times (95% CI: 1.3; 3.1, p < 0.001) higher than that of the people who have good understanding about it. The rate of willingness to do any related SD programmes of the people who understanding is 2.1 times (95% CI: 1.4; 3.2, p < 0.001) higher than that of the people who have bad one. Conclusions This study shows that knowledge on sustainability of the local communities is low. Occupation and income influence understanding of SD more than region, age, gender, and education. Most of the local people who do not understand SD in general, do not want to participate or act in SD programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, A., & Narain, S. (1990). Towards green villages: A strategy for environmentally south and participatory rural development. New Delhi, India: Centre for Science and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A., & Stein, J. A. (2004). “Science, technology and sustainable development: A world view”, World review of Science. Technology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 5–24. doi:10.1504/WRSTSD.2004.004852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisset, R. (2000). Methods of consultation and public participation (Chapter 9). In N. Lee & C. George (Eds.), Environmental assessment in developing and transitional countries. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M., & Christie, I. (2000). Managing sustainable development, 2nd ed. Earthscan Publications Ltd., ISBN 1 85383 440 8 (pb) and 1 85383 445 9 (hb).

  • DoNRE. (2007). Environmental situation of Quang Tri province in 2006. Vietnam: DoNRE.

  • Friedmann, J. (1990). Policy, planning and the environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56, 334–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • GTZ. (2004). Quang Tri participatory poverty assessment (pp. 3–5). Hanoi, Vietnam: GTZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • GTZ. (2006). Strategic communication for sustainable development: A conceptual overview (pp. 38–39). Eschborn, Germany: GTZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, R. (1998). A rooted sense of place in cross-cultural perspective. The Canadian Geographer, 42(3), 245–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, R. (2006). Becoming ecosynchronous, Part 2. Achieving sustainable development via person development. Sustainable development, 14(1), 1–15. doi:10.1002/sd.257.

  • Hieu, V. V. (2005). Participation of local communities in biodiversity conservation: A case study in Cat Ba National Park, Vietnam. Master thesis, Human ecology Department, Free University Brussels (VUB), Belgium.

  • International Institute of Rural Reconstruction. (1998). Participatory methods in community-based coastal resource management, 3 volumes. Silang, Cavite, Philippines. Available on the website http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-93108-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html. Accessed 24 Jan 2008.

  • Maser, C. (1998). True community is founded on a sense of place, history and trust. The Trumpeter, 15, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirghani, M. M. O., & Savenije, H. H. G. (1995). Incorporation of people’s participation in planning and implementation of water resources projects. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 20(3–4), 229–236. doi:10.1016/0079-1946(95)00033-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, B., Hens, L., & Devuyst, D. (1998). Sustainable development (2nd ed.). Brussels, Belgium: VUB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J. (Ed.) (1999). Handbook of environmental impact assessment Volume 1: Environmental impact assessment: Process, methods and potential. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Pomeroy, R. S., & Rivera-Guieb, R. (2005). Fishery co-management: A practical handbook. CABI and IDRC, ISBN 0-85199-088-6 and e-ISBN 1-55250-184-1.

  • http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-93103-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2008.

  • Propoky, L. S. (2005). The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply project in India. Printed in Great Britain. World Development, 33(11), 1801–1819. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quang Tri Statistical Office. (2007). Statistic yearbook in 2006. Quang Tri, Vietnam: Quang Tri Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajise, P. (1995). Community-based resource management in the Philippines: Perspectives and experiences. A paper presented at the Fisheries Co-management workshop, North Sea Center, 29–31 May, Hirtshals, Denmark. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-93103-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2008.

  • Salam, M. A., Noguchi, T., & Moike, M. (2005). Factors influencing the sustained participation of farmers in participatory forestry: A case study in central Sal forests in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management, 74, 43–51. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.08.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheate, W. R. (1994). Making an impact: A guide to EIA law and policy. London: Cameron May.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (1998). Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. http://www.unece.org/env/pp/documents/cep43e.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2008.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Leonard Kaufman (Department of Medical Statistics, Free University of Brussels, Belgium), Mrs. Nguyen Quynh Anh (Hanoi School of Public Health), MD. Hoang Nam Thai (Family Health International, Vietnam Office), and MD. Hoang Minh Duc (National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology) for their helpful comments and Miss. Rachel Sandra Stephen Waghchoure (World Wide Funds, Pakistan) for her English review of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Hens.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Annex

Annex

1.1 Annex 1: The list of explanatory variables

Demographic information

  • Age: 16–24 years old = 1, 25–75 years old = 2;

  • Gender: male = 1, female = 2;

  • Education: tertiary/university = 1, not tertiary/university = 2;

  • Occupation: farmer = 1, trader = 2, government official and teacher = 3;

  • Income($US per year per house): <2,251 = 1, 2,251–4,500 = 2.

Knowledge: including:

Knowing the concept of SD: No = 0, Yes = 1.

Identifying the content of SD: <5 issues = 0, 5–9 issues = 1 (the sum of the scores for 9 issues: Using safe drinking water (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Living within a fresh air area (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Increasing forest land (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Access to health care centre (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Pupils go to a school (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Employment (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Enough food (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + High population growth (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Having sanitation (No = 0 or Yes = 1).

Identify SDIs: less than 5 indicators = 0, 5–16 indicators = 1 (the sum of the scores of 16 indicators: Life expectancy at birth (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Mortality rate under age five (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Nutritional status of infants (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Access to safe water (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Percentage of population with adequate sewage disposal facilities (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Immunisation against infectious childhood diseases (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Contraceptive prevalence rate (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Percentage of population with access to primary health care facilities (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Arable land per capita (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Soil erosion (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Land use changes (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Use of agricultural pesticides (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Air pollutions + Faecal coliform in freshwater (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Percentage of forest area (No = 0 or Yes = 1) + Abundance of selected key species).

Attitude: want to participate in the programmes, No = 0, Yes = 1.

Practice: doing relative programmes of health care or/and environment, No = 0, Yes = 1.

Annex 2: To understand, perform, and participate in SDa
Annex 3: Logistic regression analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hai, L.T., Hai, P.H., Dung, T.A. et al. Influencing factors on sustainable development: a case study in Quang Tri province, Vietnam. Environ Dev Sustain 12, 103–116 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9183-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9183-y

Keywords

Navigation