Abstract
A combined approach utilizing GIS, Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) has been developed for resource mapping in a rural poverty-prone area of Bangladesh. This model integrated GIS and participatory tools to include the voices of the stakeholders in assessing available resources and needs. The resource mapping framework, developed using PRA with local community people and community gatekeepers, was aimed at sustainable resource management, and ArcView GIS was used to digitize the resource maps as a Decision Support System (DSS). A detailed assessment and analysis of the quality, quantity and physical status of resources was first mapped in the field and then digitized using GIS. FGD-based interaction with community people at each union in a subdistrict of Bangladesh revealed stakeholders’ opinions on land and water body management. The present paper demonstrates the power of this model as a policy-making tool for sustainable development and poverty eradication. It also recognized the need for collaboration between interdisciplinary policy planners and researchers to develop and implement a policy on agricultural resource management for poverty-prone areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
70 Tk = 1 US$.
Abbreviations
- PRA:
-
Participatory Rural Appraisal
- FGD:
-
Focus Group discussion
- DoF:
-
Directorate of Fisheries
- TOR:
-
Terms of Reference
- CBRMP:
-
Community Based Resource Management Project
- DAE:
-
Department of Agricultural and Extension
- LGED:
-
Local Government and Engineering Division
- MIS:
-
Management Information System
- EADS:
-
Environment, Agriculture, and Development Services
- CS:
-
Cadastral Survey
- DLRS:
-
Directorate of Land Records and Surveys
References
Ahamed, T. (2001). GIS modeling on spatial database management for agricultural mechanization of Bangladesh. MS thesis, Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Ahamed, T., Takigawa, T., Koike, M., Hossain, M. M., Huq, M. M., & Faruk, M. O. (2003). Assessment of energy status by GIS for agricultural mechanization. A case study of Bangladesh. Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research, 38(4), 221–236.
Ahamed, T., Takigawa, T., Koike, M., Hossain, M. M., Huq, M. M., & Faruk, M. O. (2006). Assessment of energy status for irrigation technology in Bangladesh: A GIS approach. Energy, 31, 2681–2704. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.011.
Carver, S. (2003). The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: Developing a research agenda for the 21st century. Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) Journal, 15(APA I), 61–71.
Craig, W., & Elwood, S. (1998). How and why community groups use maps and geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(2), 95–104. doi:10.1559/152304098782594616.
Faruk, M.O. & Ahamed, T. (2002). Cropping area assessment in flood prone areas using GIS. Journal of Institution of Engineers 29, AE (1), 67–71.
Ghose, R. (2001). Use of information technology for community empowerment: transforming geographic information systems into community information systems. Transactions in GIS, 5(2), 141–163. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00073.
Hassan, M. M. (2005). Arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh: Spatial mitigation planning with GIS and public participation. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 74(2), 247–260. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.01.008.
Hjortsø, C. N., Møller, C. S., & Peter, T. (2005). Rapid stakeholder and conflict assessment for natural resource management using cognitive mapping: The case of Damdoi Forest Enterprise, Vietnam. Agriculture and Human Values, 22, 149–167. doi:10.1007/s10460-004-8275-z.
Hunter, L. M., Gonzalez, M. D. J. G., Stevenson, M., Karish, S. K., Thomas, C. E. J., Robert, J. L., et al. (2003). Population and land use change in the California Mojave: Natural habitat implications of alternative futures. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 373–397. doi:10.1023/A:1027311225410.
Kyem, P. A. K. (2002). Promoting local community participation in forest management through a PPGIS application in Southern Ghana. In W. Craig, T. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 218–231). Taylor and Francis: London & New York.
Mapedza, E., Wright, J., & Fawcett, R. (2003). An investigation of land cover change in Mafungautsi forest, Zimbabwe, using GIS and participatory mapping. Applied Geography (Sevenoaks England), 23(1), 1–21. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(02)00070-X.
McCall, M. K. (2004 May). Can participatory-GIS strengthen local-level spatial planning? Suggestions for better practice. Paper presented on the seventh international conference on GIS for Developing Countries, GISDECO, University Technology Malaysia, Malaysia.
Minang, P.A. (2003). Assessing participatory geographic information system for community forestry planning in Cameroon: A local governance perspective. MSc Thesis, ITC, The Netherlands.
Robbins, P. (2003). Beyond ground truth: GIS and the environmental knowledge of herders, professional foresters, and other traditional communities. Human Ecology, 31, 233–253. doi:10.1023/A:1023932829887.
Robiglio, V., William, A. M., & Diaw, M. C. (2003). Mapping landscapes: Integrating GIS and social science methods to model human-nature relationships in southern Cameroon small-scale forest economics. Management and Policy, 2(2), 171–184.
Trang, N. T. (2004). PGIS’s relevance, applicability and conditions in local rural development: a case study with village development planning in Bach Ma national park buffer zone, Vietnam. MSc Thesis, ITC, The Netherlands.
Zurayk, R. (2003). Participatory GIS-based natural resource management: experiences from a country of the south. Aridlands Newsletter, 53. Retrieved from http://cals.arizona.edu/OALS/ALN/aln53/zurayk.html
WCED. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development (A/RES/42/187). 96th Plenary meeting 11 December 1987. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the IFAD-assisted Community Based Research Management Project Launched by LGED and coordinated by EADS, Dhaka. The gratitude also extended to DLRS, DAE, DoF, village participants, local NGO workers, facilitator, local elites, and local governments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.
Glossary
Glossary
- Aus :
-
Aus paddy and jute are cultivated during the Kharif-I crop calendar, which is in the wet season lasting from April to July
- Aman :
-
Aman paddy is cultivated during the Kharif-II crop calendar in the wet season lasting from July to November
- Beel :
-
A seasonally flooded permanent or semi-permanent water body located within a river floodplain and connected to the river by a natural system of drainage channels, equivalent to a lake, and a very important fish habitat
- Boro :
-
Rice crop cultivated during the Rabi crop calendar in the dry season lasting from December to April
- Hoar :
-
Large natural inter-riverine depression typically extending over 1000 ha or more may be inundated to depths of three meters or more during the monsoon season
- Khal or natural canal :
-
A natural water channel located within a river floodplain, which enables floodwaters to flow over the floodplain and to drain back into river channels, important for fish migration and breeding
- Khas :
-
Government-owned land available for leasing to the public
- Kanda :
-
Raised land near beel, hoar and river used for grazing livestock, threshing, and/or other purposes
- Mouza :
-
Smallest revenue unit, which may consist of one or more village
- Gopat :
-
A narrow pathway which connect two crop field
- Upazila :
-
Administrative unit of local government, equivalent to a subdistrict, consisting typically of about five to ten unions
- Union :
-
Smallest administrative unit, consisting of one or more mouzas
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahamed, T., Khan, M.I.N., Takigawa, T. et al. Resource management for sustainable development: a community- and GIS-based approach. Environ Dev Sustain 11, 933–954 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9159-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9159-y