Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adoption and adaptation of natural resource management innovations in smallholder agriculture: reflections on key lessons and best practices

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many smallholder farmers in vulnerable areas continue to face complex challenges in adoption and adaptation of resource management and conservation strategies. Although much has been learned from diverse experiences in sustainable resource management, there is still inadequate understanding of the market, policy and institutional failures that shape and structure farmer incentives and investment decisions. The policy and institutional failures exacerbate market failures, locking smallholder resource users into a low level equilibrium that perpetuates poverty and land degradation. Improved market access that raises the returns to land and labor is often the driving force for adoption of new practices in agriculture. Market linkages, access to credit and availability of pro-poor options for beneficial conservation are critical factors in stimulating livelihood and sustainability-enhancing investments. Future interventions need to promote joint innovations that ensure farmer experimentation and adaptation of new technologies and careful consideration of market, policy and institutional factors that stimulate widespread smallholder investments. Future projects should act as ‘toolboxes’, giving essential support to farmers to devise complementary solutions based on available options. Addressing the externalities and institutional failures that prevent private and joint investments for management of agricultural landscapes will require new kinds of institutional mechanisms for empowering communities through local collective action that would ensure broad participation and equitable distributions of the gains from joint conservation investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, A. (1998). Land degradation, agricultural productivity and common property: Evidence from Cote d’Ivore. Environment and Development, 3, 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baidu-Forson, J. (1999). Factors affecting adoption of land-enhancing technology in the Sahel: Lessons from a case study in Niger. Agricultural Economics, 20, 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. (2000). The economic linkages between rural poverty and land degradation: Some evidence from Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 82, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Lynam, J., Place, F., Reardon, T., & Aboud, A. A. (2002). Towards improved natural resource management in African agriculture. In C. Barrett, F. Place, & A. Aboud (Eds.), Natural resource management in African agriculture. Undersigning and improving current practices (pp. 287–296). CAB Publishing.

  • Biot, Y., Blakie, P., Jackson, P., & Palmer-Jones, R. (1995). Re-thinking research on land degdaration in developing countries. World Bank Discussion paper 289. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth. The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Earthscan publications Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, R. (1989). Encouraging farmer’s experiments. In R. Chambers, A. Pacey, & L. Thrupp (Eds.), Farmer first (pp. 55–59). International Technology Publications.

  • Cleaver, K. M., & Schreiber, G. A. (1994). Reversing the spiral. The population, agriculture and environmental nexus in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramb, R. A., Garcia, J. N. M., Gerrits, R. V., & Saguiguit, G. C. (1999). Smallholder adoption of soil conservation technologies: Evidence from Upland Project from the Philippines. Land Degradation and Development, 10, 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Pacey A., & Thrupp L. (Eds.) (1989). Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publications, 218 pp.

  • Chambers, R. (1987). Sustainable livelihoods, environment and development: Putting poor people first. Discussion Paper 240, Institute of Development Studies, UK.

  • Critchley, W., Reij, C., & Seznec, A. (1992). Water harvesting for plant production. Volume II: Case studies and conclusions for sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Technical Paper No. 157, 133p.

  • Critchley, W., Sombatpanit, S., & Madina, P. (2001) Uncertain steps? Terraces in the tropics. In: E. Bridges, I. Hannam, I. Oldeman, L. Penning de Vries, F Scherr, & S. Sombatpanit (Eds.), Response to land degradation. Enfield: Science Publishers Inc.

  • de Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., & Sadoulet, E. (1991). Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: Some paradoxes explained. Economic Journal, 101, 1400–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka, S. (1994). Learning from six reasons why farmers do not adopt innovations intended to improve sustainability of upland agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 46, 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebremedhin, B., Pender, J., & Tesfay, G. (2003). Community natural resource management: the case of community woodlots in northern Ethiopia. Environment and Development Economics, 8, 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J., & Binswanger, H. P. (1996). Natural resource degradation effects of poverty and population growth are largely policy induced: The case of Colombia. Environment and Development Economics, 1, 64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, K., Braverman, A. & Stiglitz, J. E. (Eds.) (1993). The economics of rural organisation. Oxford University Press.

  • Holden, S., Shiferaw, B., & Pender, J. (2004). Non-farm income, household welfare and sustainable land management in the less favored area in the Ethiopian highlands. Food Policy, 29, 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S., & Shiferaw, B. (2004). Land degradation, drought and food security in the less-favored areas of Ethiopian highlands: A bio-economic model with market imperfections. Agricultural Economics, 30, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. T., Shiferaw, B., & Wik, M. (1998). Poverty, credit constraints, and time preferences: Of relevance for environmental policy? Environment and Development Economics, 3, 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurni, H. (2000). Assessing sustainable land management (SLM). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 81, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2001). Rural poverty report. The challenge of ending rural poverty. Oxford University Press and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Rome.

  • Joshi, P. K., Jha, A. K., Wani, S. P., Joshi, L., & Shiyani, R. L. (2005). Meta-analysis to assess impact of watershed programme and people’s participation. Research Report No. 8. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324,Andhra Pradesh, India.

  • Kerr, J., & Sanghi, N. (1992). Indigenous soil and water conservation in India’s semi-arid tropics. Gatekeeper series. No 34. London. International Institute for Environment and Development, 1993.

  • Kerr, J., Milne, G., Chhotray, V., Baumann, P., & James, A. J. (2007). Managing watershed externalities in India. Theory and Practice. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 9, 263–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. R. (2005). Agricultural Sustainability and technology adoption in developing countries: Issues and policies for developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 1325–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, V., Niemeijer, D., Stroosnijder, L., & Rolling, N. (2001). Social networks and the dynamics of soil water conservation in Sahel. Gatekeeper Series SA101. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

  • Pandey, S. (2001). Adoption of soil conservation practices in developing countries: Policy and institutional factors. In: E. Bridges, I. Hannam, I. Oldeman, L. Penning de Vries, F Scherr, & S. Sombatpanit (eds.) Response to land degradation. Enfield: Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak, S., & Mercer, D. E. (1997). Valuing soil conservation benefits of agroforestry: Contour hedgerows in eastern Visayas, Philippines. Agricultural Economics, 18, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pender, J. L., & Kerr, J. M. (1998). Determinants of farmers’ indigenous soil and water conservation investments in semi-arid India. Agricultural Economics, 19, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pender, J. L., Nkonya, E., Jager, P., Sserunkuuma, D., & Ssali, H. (2004). Strategies to increase agricultural productivity and reduce land degradation. Agricultural Economics, 31, 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pender, J., & Hazell, P. (2000). Promoting sustainable development in less-favored lands: overview. In Pender, J. & Hazell, P. (Eds.) Promoting sustainable development in less-favored lands. Focus 4. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, C., Kydd, J., & Doward, A. (2006). Overcoming market constraints on pro-poor agricultural growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Review, 24, 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, T., & Vosti, S. A. (1997). Poverty environment links in rural areas of developing countries. In T. Reardon & S. A. Vosti (Eds.), Sustainable growth and poverty alleviation. The John Hopkins University Press.

  • Reardon, T., & Vosti, S. A. (1995). Links between rural poverty and environment in developing countries: Asset categories and investment poverty. World Development, 23, 1495–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, V. R., (2005). Costs of resource depletion externalities: A study of groundwater overexploitation in Andhra Pradesh, India. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 533–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reij, C. (1991). Indigenous soil and water conservation in Africa. Gatekeeper Series 27. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M., & Williams, T. O. (2005). Land management and its benefits: The challenge, and the rationale, for sustainable management of drylands. A paper presented at a STAP Workshop on Sustainable Land Management. Washington DC.

  • Scherr, S. (2000). A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy, 25, 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw, B., & Holden, S. T. (1998). Resource degradation and adoption of land conservation technologies in the Ethiopian highlands: A case study in Andit Tid, North Shewa. Agricultural Economics, 18(3), 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw, B., & Holden, S. (2000). Policy instruments for sustainable land management: the case of highland smallholders in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 22, 217–232.

  • Shiferaw, B., & Holden, S. (2001). Farm-level benefits to investment for mitigating land degradation. Environment and Development Economics, 6, 355–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw, B., & Bantilan, C. (2004). Rural poverty and natural resource management in less-favored areas: Revisiting challenges and conceptual issues. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2(1), 328–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinton, S. M., & Quiroz, R. (2003). Is poverty to blame for soil, pasture, and forest degradation in Peru Altiplano? World Development, 31, 1903–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, S. R., & Scherr, S. R. (1999). Effects of demographic and related microeconomic change on land quality in hills and mountains of developing countries. World Development, 27, 903–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen, M., Martimore, M., & Gichuki, F. (1994). More people less erosion: Environmental recovery in Kenya. John Wiley and Sons Publishers. London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bekele A. Shiferaw.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiferaw, B.A., Okello, J. & Reddy, R.V. Adoption and adaptation of natural resource management innovations in smallholder agriculture: reflections on key lessons and best practices. Environ Dev Sustain 11, 601–619 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9132-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9132-1

Keywords

Navigation