Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the natural-cultural resources in Çanakkale for nature-based tourism

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the world is going into different tourism expectations, the tourism understanding in Turkey is defined as tourism in the sea-sand-sun triangle. However, it is possible to contribute to the income and local development of the indigenous people by developing nature-based tourism. Besides, with the sustainable use and preservation of the natural-cultural assets, the damage of the traditional tourism industry on the natural and cultural environment could be reduced. In this study, it is aimed to bring up the nature-based tourism concept in Çanakkale by evaluating the nature-based tourism industry in the general of Turkey and assessing the natural-cultural resources that Çanakkale comprehends. The most important areas that have a nature-based tourism potential in Çanakkale and the tourism activities that are most suitable for these areas have been determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. (2002). Türkiye’nin Turizm Değerleri (Vol. II). Ankara: T.C. Turizm Bakanlığı Yatırımlar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assos Information Page. (n.d.). Retrieved May, 2006, from http://www.pinarbasi.com/assos/.

  • Aydoğan, N. B. (2002, April). Çanakkale turizmi’nin profili ve çeşitlendirilmesi. Paper presented at the 2nd Turizm Şurası Bildirileri, Ankara.

  • Bakırcı, M. (2002). Ekoturizm. Paper presented at the 2nd Turizm Şurası Bildirileri, Ankara.

  • Bejder, L., & Samuels, A. (2003). Evaluating the effects of nature-based tourism on cetaceans. In N. Gales, M. Hindell, & R. Kirkwood (Eds.), Marine mammals: fisheries, tourism and management issues (pp. 229–256). Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookbinder, M. P., Dinerstein, E., Rijal, A., Cauley, H., & Rajouria, A. (1998). Ecotourism’s support of biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 12(6), 1399–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Tourism Research. (1997). International visitor survey, 1996. Canberra: Austarlian Government Publishing Service.

  • Bureau of Tourism Research (1999). Domestic tourism monitor year ended March 1998. Canberra: Austarlian Government Publishing Service.

  • Çağatay, A., Yurdaer, M., & Kırış, R. (2002, April). Eko-turizm için mekan ve yerel toplulukların katılımının planlanması: Akseki-İbradı Havzası örneği. Paper presented at the 2nd Turizm Şurası Bildirileri, Ankara.

  • Deng, J., King, B., & Bauer, T. (2002). Evaluating natural attractions for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 422–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erten, İ. (1997). Çanakkale Evleri Yaşatma Projesi. Çanakkale: ÇEYAP – Tarihi Kent Komisyonu Gündem Gazetesi Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehu, J. M., Uslu, T., & Costa, M. (1989). Apport à la connaissance phytosociologique du littoral sud de la Turquie méditerranéenne. Végétation et Qualité de L’environnement Cotier en Mediterranée, 1, 591–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, H. (1996). In pursuit of ecotourism. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gössling, S., Hansson, C. B., Hörstmeier, O., & Saggel, S. (2002). Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability. Ecological Economics, 43, 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullette, G. S. (2001). The multivocality of ecotourism: Complications in defining, implementing and evaluating. Planeta April 2001 Headlines, Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http://www.planeta.com/planeta/01/0104ecotourism.html.

  • Kepe, T. (2001). Tourism, protected areas and development in South Africa: Views of visitors to mkambati nature reserve. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 31(3–4), 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeman, A. (1998, April). Sustainable development-based ecotourism. Paper presented at Workshop on ecotourism’s role in sustainable tourism development in Vietnam, Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.mekonginfo.org/mrc_en/doclib.nsf/0/696047C635E5CBD4802566F0005245BC/$FILE/Acticle2.htm.

  • Laarman, J., & Gregersen, H. (1994, July). Making nature-based tourism contribute to sustainable development: A policy framework. EPAT/MUCIA Policy Brief, No. 5, Retrieved from http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_laarman001.pdf.

  • Lee, C. K. (1997). Valuation of nature-based tourism resources using dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. Tourism Management, 18(8), 587–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., & McAleer, M. (2005). Ecologically sustainable tourism management. Environmental Modeling & Software, 20(11), 1431–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastny, L. (2002). Dünya’nın durumu: Worldwatch enstitüsü raporu. İstanbul: Özel Dünya Zirvesi Baskısı TEMA Vakfı Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortan, K. (2003). Çanakkale ekonomisi ve gelecek senaryosu projesi. Çanakkale: Dünya Yayıncılık.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orams, M. B. (1995). Using interpretation to manage nature-based tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 4(2), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öge, H. (2003). Savaşın coğrafyası (Gelibolu Yarımadası). Photo In R. Aslan & G. Bieb (Vol. 118, Eds.), Atlas Aylık Coğrafya ve Keşif Dergisi (pp. 76–87). Turkey: D.B.R. Dergi Yayıncılık ve Pazarlama A.Ş., No. 01.

  • Özel, E. (2004). Çanakkale ili doğal ve kültürel potansiyelinin turizm ve rekreasyonel kullanım yönünden incelenmesi. Dissertation, University of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart.

  • Özel, A. E., Oktay, P., & Yıldırım, B. T. (2002, November). Assos kıyı yerleşiminin turizm potansiyeli. Paper presented at Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Türkiye’nin Kıyı ve Deniz Alanları IV. Ulusal Konferansı.

  • Öztürk, B., Topaloğlu, B., & Dede, A. (2003). Deniz canlıları rehberi. Ankara: Tüdav Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priskin, J. (2001). Assessment of natural resources for nature-based tourism: The case of the central coast region of Western Australia. Tourism Management, 22, 637–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. (1993). Ecological disturbance and nature tourism. Geographical Review, 83, 290–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seçmen, Ö., & Leblebici, E. (1978). Gökçeada ve Bozcaada adalarının vegetasyon ve florası. Bitki, 5(2), 195–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spenceley, A. (2003). Managing sustainable nature-based tourism in southern Africa: a practical assessment tool. Dissertation, University for Greenwich.

  • Worldwide Statistical Fact Sheet (2000). The International Ecotourism Society (TIES), North Bennington, Retrieved from http://www.ecotourism.org/research/stats/files/stats.txt.

  • Wunder, S. (2000). Ecotourism and economic incentives: An empirical approach. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, T. B. (2002). Kazdağları ve İzmir Çanakkale yolu. Paper presented at Türkiye Dağları I. Ulusal Sempozyumu, Kastamonu.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tutku Ak.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yıldırım, T.B., Ak, T. & Ölmez, Z. Assessment of the natural-cultural resources in Çanakkale for nature-based tourism. Environ Dev Sustain 10, 871–881 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9089-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9089-0

Keywords

Navigation