Skip to main content
Log in

Inverse Modeling for Aquatic Source and Transport Parameters Identification and its Application to Fukushima Nuclear Accident

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inverse modeling technique based on nonlinear least square regression method (LSRM) is developed for the identification of aquatic source and transport parameters. Instantaneous line source release model in two-dimensional domain and continuous point source release model in three-dimensional domain are used for the purpose. Case studies have been carried out for both types of releases to illustrate their application. Error analysis has been carried out to identify the maximum error that can be tolerated in the input concentration data used in the inverse model and to specify the minimum number of sampling points to generate such input data. The LSRM is compared with the well-established correlation coefficient optimization method for instantaneous line source release model, and good comparison is observed between them. The LSRM is used to quantitatively estimate the releases of different radionuclides into the Pacific Ocean which has resulted due to the discharge of highly radioactive liquid effluent from the affected Daiichi Nuclear Power Station at Fukushima in Japan. The measured concentrations of these radionuclides in seawater samples collected from two sampling points near Fukushima are used for the estimation. The average release works out to be 1.09 × 1016 for 131I, 3.4 × 1015 Bq for 134Cs, and 3.57 × 1015 Bq for 137Cs. Very good agreement is observed between the releases estimated in this study and those estimated by other different agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sidauruk, P. (1996). Parameter determination for multi-layered aquifer and groundwater contaminant transport. Ph.D. Diss., University of Delaware.

  2. Gorelick, S. M., Evans, B., & Remson, I. (1983). Identifying sources of groundwater pollution: an optimization approach. Water Resources Research, 19(3), 779–790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zou, S., & Parr, A. (1993). Estimation of dispersion parameters for two-dimensional plumes. Ground Water, 31, 389–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pisani, S., & Tosi, N. (1993). Stability study of a longitudinal dispersivity identification method. Ground Water, 31(1), 115–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sidauruk, P., Cheng, A. H.-D., & Ouazar, D. (1998). Ground water contaminant source and transport parameter identification by correlation coefficient optimization. Ground Water, 36(2), 208–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahar, P. S., & Datta, B. (2001). Optimal identification of groundwater pollution sources and parameter estimation. Journal Water Resources Planning and Management, ACSE, 127(1), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. David, C. L. (1996). Linear algebra and its applications (2nd ed.). Boston: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ortega, J., & Rheinboldt, W. (1970). Iterative solution of nonlinear equations in several variables. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bear, J. (1979). Hydraulics of groundwater. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Socolofsky, S. A., & Jirka, G. H. (2005). CVEN 489–501: special topics in mixing and transport processes in the environment. USA: Coastal and Ocean Engineering Division, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  11. IRSN (2011). Impact on the marine environment of radioactive releases following the nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi. Information Note dated 13 May 2011. Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, France.

  12. Tsumune, D., et al. (2011). Distribution of oceanic 137Cs from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant simulated numerically by a regional ocean model. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.10.007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. TEPCO (2011). http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release. Tokyo Electrical Power Company, Japan.

  14. TEPCO (2012). http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release. Tokyo Electrical Power Company, Japan.

  15. Shimizu, Y., Yasuda, I., & Ito, S. (2001). Distribution and circulation of the coastal Oyashio intrusion. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 31, 1561–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yasuda, I. (2003). Hydrographic structure and variability in the Kuroshio–Oyahio transition area. Journal of Oceanography, 59, 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yanagimoto, D., & Taira, K. (2003). Current measurements of the Japan Sea proper water and the intermediate water by ALACE floats. Journal Oceanography, 59, 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bailly du Bois, P., et al. (2011). Estimation of marine source-term following Fukushima Daiichi accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.11.015.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buesseler, K. O., et al. (2012). Fukushima-derived radionuclides in the ocean and biota off Japan. PNAS, 109, 5984–5988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nair, R. N., Faby Sunny, Manish Chopra, Sharma, L. K., Puranik, V. D., and Ghosh, A. K. (2013). Estimation of radionuclide releases into Pacific Ocean due to Fukushima nuclear accident. Environmental Earth Sciences. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2501-I.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. K. Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, L.K., Ghosh, A.K., Nair, R.N. et al. Inverse Modeling for Aquatic Source and Transport Parameters Identification and its Application to Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Environ Model Assess 19, 193–206 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-013-9391-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-013-9391-1

Keywords

Navigation