Abstract
The evolution of land-use spatial conflict is a comprehensive reflection of regional development and a common phenomenon in urbanization. The research on land-use spatial conflicts can provide theoretical basis and practical support for spatial control. The present study employs Tianjin as the research object, and ecological risk assessment model was improved based on landscape pattern analysis by selecting appropriate indicators that may bring conflict risk problems. The spatial conflict measurement model of land-use based on the coordination of human-land-landscape elements was preliminarily constructed. The spatial and temporal evolution of land-use spatial conflict degree, and spatial autocorrelation from 2000 to 2020 was preliminarily analyzed. Results showed that (1) the conflict measurement level of the model was verified by Google Earth remote sensing image platform and field survey, and the results were relatively consistent with the actual situation, which proves that this method was feasible. (2) The areas with low intensity of land-use conflict were mainly distributed in remote mountainous areas with less human activities, while the areas with high comprehensive conflict index were mainly distributed in the central urban area with more active human activities and urbanization, the urban fringe area, the water-land ecotone, and some landscape transition areas. (3) There was a close relationship between land use spatial conflict and land-use change. Areas with severe and frequent land-use changes were often areas with noticeable land-use conflict changes. In the period of high land-use change intensity and frequent land-use mode conversion, it was also a period of a large area where regional land-use conflict was enhanced. (4) The overall level of conflict showed an average trend year by year, and the high conflict fluctuates greatly with first rising and then falling, but the change range was small. Moderate conflict mainly showed a decreasing trend, with an extensive change range. The early stage of the mild conflict was relatively stable, and the later stage changed significantly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data included in this study are available upon request by contact with the corresponding author.
References
Amman, H. M., & Duraiappah, A. K. (2001). Modeling instrumental rationality, land tenure and conflict resolution. Computational Economics, 18(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014811703866
Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007
Chen, S., Ai, D., & Fu, Y. (2020a). Spatial conflict measurement and influencing factors based on ecological security: A case study of Kunming City. Journal of China Agricultural University, 25(5), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.05.15
Chen, Y., Xie, B., Zhong, D., Wu, L., & Zhang, A. (2018). Predictive simulation of ecological space based on a particle swarm optimization-Markov composite model: A case study for Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomerations. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201612082530
Chen, Z., Feng, X., Hong, Z., & Li, Y. (2020b). Calculation and analysis of spatial conflicts in land use of Nanchang city. Areal Research and Development, 39(3), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2020.03.027
Cilliers, D. P. (2019). Considering flood risk in spatial development planning: A land use conflict analysis approach. Jàmbá:Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i1.537
Deng, Y. (2017). The spatial succession and organization model of the urban material space within the rail transit station: a case in Beijing. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 37(6), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.06.002
Ding, Q., Wang, L., Fu, M., & Huang, N. (2020). An integrated system for rapid assessment of ecological quality based on remote sensing data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32779–32795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09424-6
Feng, Y., Bi, R., Wang, J., Lv, C., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Spatial conflict of land use caused by mining exploitation and optimal allocation scheme of land resources in river basin. China Land Science, 30(11), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20161207.145122
Guo, Y., Li, S., Liu, R., & Zhang, J. (2021). Relationship between landscape pattern and water quality of the multi-scale effects in the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Lake Sciences, 33(3), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.18307/2021.0310
Hui, E. C. M., & Bao, H. (2013). The logic behind conflicts in land acquisitions in contemporary China: A framework based upon game theory. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.001
Hussain, S., Mubeen, M., Akram, W., Ahmad, A., Habib-ur-Rahman, M., Ghaffar, A., Amin, A., Awais, M., Farid, H. U., Farooq, A., & Nasim, W. (2020). Study of land cover/land use changes using RS and GIS: A case study of Multan district. Pakistan. Environ. Monit. Assess., 192(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7959-1
Ianoş, I., Sorensen, A., & Merciu, C. (2017). Incoherence of urban planning policy in Bucharest: Its potential forland use conflict. Land Use Policy, 60, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.030
Iojă, C. I., Niţă, M. R., Vânău, G. O., Onose, D. A., & Gavrilidis, A. A. (2014). Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Ecological Indicators, 42, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.029
Karimi, A., & Brown, G. (2017). Assessing multiple approaches for modelling land-use conflict potential from participatory mapping data. Land Use Policy, 67, 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.004
Karimi, A., & Hockings, M. (2018). A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management. Landscape Ecology, 33(5), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0636-x
Kim, I., & Arnhold, S. (2018). Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds. Science of the Total Environment, 630, 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.176
Kang, Z., Wang, S., Xu, L., Yang, F., & Zhang, S. (2021). Suitability assessment of urban land use in Dalian, China using PNN and GIS. Natural Hazards, 106(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04500-z
Luca, G. D., & Sekeries, P. G. (2014). Land inequality and conflict intensity. Public Choice, 150(1/2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9692-8
Luijten, J. C. (2003). A systematic method for generating land use patterns using stochastic rules and basic landscape characteristics: Results for a Colombian hillside watershed. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(2), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(2)00219-0
Scullion, J. J., Vogt, K. A., Sienkiewicz, A., Gmur, S. J., & Trujillo, C. (2014). Assessing the influence of land-cover change and conflicting land-use authorizations on ecosystem conversion on the forest frontier of Madre de Dios, Peru. Biological Conservation, 171, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.036
Sekeris, P. (2010). Land inequality and conflict in Sub-Saharan Afeica. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 16(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1208
Shao, X., & Hu, Y. (2016). Conflict and balance between farmland ownership and income right: A theoretical analysis framework for realizing farmers’ land property right. Macroeconomics, (12), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.16304/j.cnki.11-3952/f.2016.12.002
Su, W., Ma, L., Chen, S., & Yang, G. (2020). Conflict analysis and system optimization of urban ecological space. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(3), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200308
Wang, C., Wang, Y., Wang, R., & Zheng, P. (2018). Modeling and evaluating land-use/land-cover change for urban planning and sustainability: A case study of Dongying city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1529–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.294
Wang, T., Cao, J., Zhao, Y., Han, L., & Liu, Z. (2021). Evaluation of land ecosystem health in Shaanxi Province, Northwest China based on PSR model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 32(5), 1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.013
Wu, Z., Lv, H., Meng, Y., Guan, X., & Zang, Y. (2021). The determination of flood damage curve in areas lacking disaster data based on the optimization principle of variation coefficient and beta distribution. Science of the Total Environment, 750, 142277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.142277
Xiang, S., Wan, L., & Pang, Y. (2020). Spatial-temporal variation of inflow river water quality under land use effect. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 39(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2019-0904
Xu, F., & Lv, X. (2018). Ecological risk pattern based on land use changes in Jiangsu coastal areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(20), 7312–7325. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201709041596
Yang, Y., Yang, X., Li, E., & Huang, W. (2021). Transitions in land use and cover and their dynamic mechanisms in the Haihe River Basin China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09291-x
Yao, Z., Wang, B., Huang, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., Deng, R., et al. (2021). Analysis of land use changes and driving forces in the Yanhe River basin from 1980 to 2015. Journal of Sensors, 2021, 6692333. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6692333
Yu, B., & Lv, C. (2006). The progress and prospect of land use conflicts. Progress in Geography, 25(3), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.03.013
Zhang, H., Zeng, Y., Jin, X., Shu, B., Zhou, Y., & Yang, X. (2016). Simulating multi-objective land use optimization allocation using Multi-agent system - A case study in Changsha, China. Ecological Modelling, 320, 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.017
Zhao, X., Tang, F., Zhang, P., Hu, B., & Xu, L. (2019). Dynamic simulation and characteristic analysis of county production-livingecological spatial conflicts based on CLUE-S model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(16), 5897–5908. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201901070059
Zhou, D., Xu, J., & Wang, L. (2015a). Land use spatial conflicts and complexity: A case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China. Geographical Research, 34(9), 1630–1642. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201509003
Zhou, D., Xu, J., & Wang, L. (2015b). Process of land use conflict research in China during the past fifteen years. China Land Science, 29(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2015b.02.003
Zou, L., Liu, Y., Wang, J., & Yang, Y. (2021). An analysis of land use conflict potentials based on ecological-production-living function in the southeast coastal area of China. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107297
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 51868008] and the Tianjin Research Innovation Project for Postgraduate Students [grant number 2020YJSS084].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Li, M. et al. Spatial conflict simulation of land-use based on human-land-landscape elements intercoordination: a case study in Tianjin, China. Environ Monit Assess 194, 317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09947-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09947-0