Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: a review

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The United Nations has called for increased public participation in scientific research, to benefit professionals, the public and the planet. Citizen science has been suggested as a cost-effective means by which this call can be met, and by which monitoring for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) may be carried out. Indeed, citizen science has gained significant attention in recent years as the scale of environmental issues surpasses the monitoring resources that currently exist. However, many challenges continue to act as a barrier to the acceptance of citizen science as a reliable scientific approach. Here, the current state of knowledge on the use of citizen science in water quality monitoring is reviewed, and the potential for utilizing this approach to enhance monitoring for SDG Indicator 6.3.2 on the “proportion of bodies of water of good ambient water quality” is evaluated. The objective of this review is to identify key knowledge gaps and hurdles hindering the adoption of citizen science contributions to water quality monitoring under the SDGs, so that these gaps may be addressed in a timely manner for future monitoring programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aceves-Bueno, E., Adeleye, A. S., Bradley, D., Brant, W. T., Callery, P., Feraud, M., Garner, K. L., et al. (2015). Citizen science as an approach for overcoming insufficient monitoring and inadequate stakeholder buy-in in adaptive management: criteria and evidence. Ecosystems, 18, 493–506.

  • Au, J., Bagchi, P., Chen, B., Martinez, R., Dudley, S. A., & Sorger, G. J. (2000). Methodology for public monitoring of total coliforms, Escherichia coli, and toxicity in waterways by Canadian high school students. Environmental Management, 58, 213–230.

  • Autoridad Nacional del Agua. (2018). El Monitoreo Participativo del Agua [online]. Available from: https://www.ana.gob.pe/noticia/ana-inicia-monitoreo-participativo-de-calidad-del-agua-en-el-vraem [accessed 5 February 2020].

  • Burgess, H., DeBey, L., Froehlich, H., Schmidt, N., Theobald, E., Ettinger, A., et al. (2017). The science of citizen science: exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208, 113–120.

  • Canfield Jr., D. E., Brown, C. D., Bachmann, R. W., & Hoyer, M. V. (2002). Volunteer Lake monitoring: testing the reliability of data collected by the Florida LAKEWATCH program. Lake and Reservoir Management, 18, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, T., & Cohen, A. (2018). Linking community-based monitoring to water policy: perceptions of citizen scientists. Journal of Environmental Management, 219, 168–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. T., & Daoust, T. (2008). Community-based monitoring frameworks: increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environmental Management, 41(3), 358–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1–4), 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosquer, A., Raymond, R., & Prevot-Julliard, A. C. (2012). Observations of everyday biodiversity: a new perspective for conservation? Ecology and Society, 17(4), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, F. T., Burgess, N. D., Jensen, P. M., & Pirhofer-Waizi, K. (2010). Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people's involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(6), 1166–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, J., Terry, L., Ramirez Delacruz, E., & Andonoska, L. (2009). Barriers to citizen engagement in developing countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(14), 1268–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., et al. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297.

  • Dyer, F., Harrison, E., Gruber, B., Nichols, S., Tschierschke, A., & O’Reilly, W. (2014). Waterwatch data quality: an opportunity to augment professionally collected data sets. In Vietz, G., Rutherford, I. D., & Hughes, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7thAustralian Stream Management Conference pp. (357–362). Townsville, Queensland.

  • English, P. B., Richardson, M. J., & Garzon-Galvis, C. (2018). From crowdsourcing to extreme citizen science: participatory research for environmental health. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 335–350.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L., & Marra, P. P. (2005). The neighborhood Nestwatch program: participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 589–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnham, D. J., Gibson, R. A., Hsueh, D. Y., McGillis, W. R., Culligan, P. J., Zain, N., et al. (2017). Citizen science-based water quality monitoring: constructing a large database to characterize the impacts of combined sewer overflow in New York City. Science of the Total Environment, 580, 168–177.

  • Firehock, K., & West, J. (1995). A brief history of volunteer biological water monitoring using macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 14(1), 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fore, S. L., Paulsen, K., & O’laughlin, K. (2001). Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biology, 46, 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, S., See, L., Carlson, T., Haklay, M. M., Oliver, J. L., Fraisl, D., et al. (2019). Citizen science and the United Nations sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(10), 922–930.

  • Gooch, M. (2005). Voices of the volunteers: an exploration of the experiences of catchment volunteers in coastal Queensland, Australia. Local Environment, 10(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, C., Ruby, M., Knisley, R., & Grimmer, L. (2007). Stream monitoring methods suitable for citizen volunteers working in the coastal plain and lower piedmont regions of Virginia. American Entomological Society, 53, 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman-Mercer, N., Antweiler, R., Wilson, N., Mutter, E., Toohey, R., & Schuster, P. (2018). Data quality from a community-based, water-quality monitoring project in the Yukon River basin. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddart, J. E. A., Thompson, M. S. A., Woodward, G., & Brooks, S. J. (2016). Citizen science: from detecting pollution to evaluating ecological restoration. WIREs Water, 3, 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jollymore, A., Haines, M. J., Satterfield, T., & Johnson, M. S. (2017). Citizen science for water quality monitoring: data implications of citizen perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management, 200, 456–467.

  • Kerr, M., Ely, E., Lee, V., & Mayio, A. (1994). A profile of volunteer environmental monitoring: national survey results. Lake and Reservoir Management, 9, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, D., Cattaneo, A., Deschamps, G., & Hudon, C. (2017). In the eye of the beholder: assessing the water quality of shoreline parks around the island of Montreal through citizen science. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 978–988.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle, S. A., Cunha, D. G. F., Shupe, S., Valiente, E., Rocha, L., Heasley, E., et al. (2016). Micro and macroscale drivers of nutrient concentrations in urban streams in south, central and North America. PLoS One, 11(9), 1–16.

  • Loperfido, J. V., Beyer, P., Just, C. L., & Schnoor, J. L. (2010). Uses and biases of volunteer water quality data. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 7193–7199.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, C. S., Fienen, M. N., Hall, D. M., & Stepenuck, K. F. (2019). Growing pains of Crowdsourced stream stage monitoring using Mobile phones: the development of CrowdHydrology. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7(128), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoff, E., Dunn, F., Cachazo, L. M., Williams, P., Biggs, J., Nicolet, P., et al. (2017). Finding clean water habitats in urban landscapes: professional researcher vs citizen science approaches. Science of the Total Environment, 581-582, 105–116.

  • McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S. C., et al. (2017). Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, 15–28.

  • Milne, R., Rosolen, S., Whitelaw, G., & Bennett, L. (2006). Multi-party monitoring in Ontario: challenges and emerging solutions. Environments, 34, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, E. R., & Neale, M. W. (2015). Volunteer and professional macroinvertebrate monitoring provide concordant assessments of stream health. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 49(3), 1–10.

  • Moonrungsee, N., Pencharee, S., & Jakmunee, J. (2015). Colorimetric analyser based on mobile phone camera for determination of available phosphorus in soil. Talanta, 136, 204–209.

  • Muenich, R. L., Peel, S., Bowling, L. C., Heller Hass, M., Turco, R. F., Frankenberger, J. R., et al. (2016). The Wabash sampling blitz: a study on the effectiveness of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1, 1–15.

  • Nerbonne, J. F., & Vondracek, B. (2003). Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: assessing training needs through examining error and bias in untrained volunteers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 22(1), 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, G., Graham, J., Crall, A., & Laituri, M. (2011). The art and science of multi-scale citizen science support. Ecological Informatics, 6, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newmand, S., & Crowston, K. (2012). The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298–304.

  • Newman, G., Chandler, M., Clyde, M., McGreavyd, B., Haklay, M., Ballard, H., et al. (2017). Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making. Biological Conservation, 208, 55–64.

  • Obrecht, D. V., Milanick, M., Perkins, B. D., Ready, D., & Jones, J. R. (1998). Evaluation of data generated from lake samples collected by volunteers. Lake and Reservoir Management, 14, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdevest, C., Orr, C. H., & Stepenuck, K. (2004). Volunteer stream monitoring and local participation in natural resource issues. Human Ecology Review, 11, 177–185.

  • Pandya, R. E. (2012). A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 314–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J., Lukyanenko, R., & Wiersma, Y. (2011). Easier citizen science is better. Nature, 471, 37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, D., & Call, S. M. (1995). Volunteer monitoring of benthic macroinvertebrates: regulatory biologists’ perspectives. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 14, 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, M. J. O., Roy, H. E., August, T., Kuria, A., Barasa, F., Bett, J., et al. (2018). Developing the global potential of citizen science: assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(2), 274–281.

  • Quinlivan, L., Chapman, D. V., & Sullivan, T. (2020). Validating citizen science monitoring of ambient water quality for the United Nations sustainable development goals. Science of the Total Environment, 699, 134255.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A. S. L., & Castro, P. T. A. (2008). Adaptation of a rapid assessment protocol for rivers on rocky meadows. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 20, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J., Hansen, D., Boston, C., Bowser, A., et al. (2014). Motivations affecting initial and long-term participation in citizen science projects in three countries. In: Proceedings of the iConference 2014, London [online]. Available from: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/47301/054_ready.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y. Accessed 28 Aug 2019.

  • Royle, J. A. (2004). Modeling abundance index data from anuran calling surveys. Conservation Biology, 18, 1378–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. L., Kaplan, R., & Grese, R. E. (2001). Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44, 629–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safford, H., & Peters, C. A. (2017). Citizen science for dissolved oxygen monitoring: case studies from Georgia and Rhode Island. Environmental Engineering Science, 35, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauermann, H., & Franzoni, C. (2015). Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 679–684.

  • Savan, B., Morgan, A. J., & Gore, C. (2003). Volunteer environmental monitoring and the role of universities: the case of citizens’ environmental watch. Environmental Management, 31(5), 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. B., & Frost, P. C. (2017). Monitoring water quality in Toronto's urban stormwater ponds: assessing participation rates and data quality of water sampling by citizen scientists in the FreshWater watch. Science of the Total Environment, 592, 738–744.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A. (2013). The accuracy of water quality monitoring data: a comparison between citizen scientists and professionals. In Master’s thesis, Saint Mary’s university. Halifax: Nova Scotia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., et al. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29.

  • Shupe, S. M. (2017). High resolution stream water quality assessment in the Vancouver, British Columbia region: a citizen science study. Science of the Total Environment, 603-604, 745–759.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepenuck, K. F., Wolfson, L. G., Liukkonen, B. W., Iles, J. M., & Grant, T. S. (2011). Volunteer monitoring of E. coli in streams of the upper Midwestern United States: a comparison of methods. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 174, 625–633.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, R., Wright-Stow, A., Kin, E., Davies-Colley, R. J., & Stott, R. (2016). Volunteer stream monitoring: do the data quality and monitoring experience support increased community involvement in freshwater decision making? Ecology and Society, 21(4), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, E. J., Ettinger, A. K., Burgess, H. K., DeBey, L. B., Schmidt, N. R., Froehlich, H. E., et al. (2015). Global change and local solutions: tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181, 236–244.

  • Thornhill, I., Loiselle, S., Lind, K., & Ophof, D. (2016). The citizen science opportunity for researchers and agencies. Bioscience, 66(9), 720–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, I., Ho, J. G., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Ho, K. C., Miguel-Chinchilla, L., et al. (2017). Prioritising local action for water quality improvement using citizen science; a study across three major metropolitan areas of chine. Science of the Total Environment, 584-585, 1268–1281.

  • Thornhill, I., Chautard, A., & Loiselle, S. (2018). Monitoring biological and chemical trends in temperate still waters using citizen science. Water, 10(839), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipaldo, G., & Allamano, P. (2016). Citizen science and community-based rain monitoring initiatives: an interdisciplinary approach across sociology and water science: citizen science and community-based rain monitoring initiatives (p. 1200). Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2018). Sustainable development goal 6 synthesis report on water and sanitation 2018. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2017). Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals [online]. Available from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=E/2017/66&Lang=E. Accessed 9 Oct 2018.

  • UNEP. (2015). Annual Report 2015 [online]. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/7506/-Sustainable_Development_Goals_-_UNEP_annual_report_2015-2016UNEP-AR-2015-SustainableDevelopmentGoals.pdf.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=3. Accessed 8 Oct 2018.

  • UNEP. (2018). Progress on ambient water quality: piloting the monitoring methodology and initial findings for SDG indicator 6.3.2. ISBN no: 978-92-807-3711-0. UN environment.

  • UN Water. (2018). Integrated monitoring guide: Step-by-step methodology for monitoring water quality (6.3.2) [online]. Available from: http://www.unwater.org/publications/step-step-methodology-monitoring-water-quality-6-3-2/. Accessed 11 Dec 2018.

  • Vail, J. H., Morgan, R., Merino, C. R., Gonzales, F., Miller, R., & Ram, J. L. (2003). Enumeration of waterborne Escherichia coli with petrifilm plates: comparison to standard methods. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 368–373.

  • Wanda, E. M., Manda, M., Kushe, J., Msiska, O., Mphande, C., Kamlomo, D., et al. (2017). Using citizen science approach to monitor water, sanitation and hygiene related risks in Karonga town, Malawi. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(6), 304–323.

  • Whitelaw, G., Vaughan, H., Craig, B., & Atkinson, D. (2003). Establishing the Canadian community-monitoring network. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 88, 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilderman, C. C., & Monismith, J. (2016). Monitoring Marcellus: a case study of a collaborative volunteer monitoring project to document the impact of unconventional shale gas extraction on small streams. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Li, A. J., Qin, J., Li, Q., Ho, J. G., & Li, H. (2017). Agricultural processes in Guangzhou and Foshan, China visibly influence water quality and phytoplankton community. Science of the Total Environment, 590-591, 361–369.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Lauren Quinlivan, Deborah V. Chapman & Timothy Sullivan

  2. Centre for Global Development, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Lauren Quinlivan

  3. UN Environment GEMS/Water Capacity Development Centre, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Deborah V. Chapman

  4. Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, 6 Lee Rd, Cork, T23 XE10, Ireland

    Timothy Sullivan

Authors
  1. Lauren Quinlivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deborah V. Chapman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Timothy Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Sullivan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quinlivan, L., Chapman, D.V. & Sullivan, T. Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: a review. Environ Monit Assess 192, 218 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8193-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8193-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation