Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical quantification of current status quo and future prediction of water quality in eight Asian megacities: challenges and opportunities for sustainable water management

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite freshwater sources are facing huge threats both for quality and quantity from uncertain global changes, namely population growth, rapid urbanization, and climate change. These threats are even more prominent in developing countries where institutional capacity of decision-makers in the field of water resources is not sufficient. Attention of scientific communities to work on adaptation barriers is increasing as the need for global change adaptation becomes apparent. This paper presents a comparative study of assessing the current water quality as well as predicting its future situation using different scenarios in eight different cities of South and Southeast Asia. The idea behind this transdisciplinary work (integrated use of hydrological science, climate science, social science, and local policies) is to provide scientific evidence to decision-makers to help them to implement right management policies at timely manner. Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP), a numerical simulation tool, was used to model river water quality using two scenarios, namely business as usual (BAU) and scenario with measures. Water quality simulation was done along one representative river from all eight cities. Simulated results for BAU scenario shows that water quality in all the study sites will further deteriorate by year 2030 compared to the current situation and will be not suitable for fishing category as desired by the local governments. Also, simulation outcome for scenario with measures advocating improvement of water quality compared to current situation signifies the importance of existing master plans. However, different measures (suggested upgradation of wastewater handling infrastructure) and policies will not be sufficient enough to achieve desirable river water quality as evident from the gap between concentration of simulated water quality and desirable water quality concentrations. This work can prove vital as it provides timely information to the decision-makers involved in keeping inventory for attaining SDG 6.0 in their regions and it also calls for immediate and inclusive action for better water resource management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akomeah, E., Chun, K. P., & Lindenschmidt, K. E. (2015). Dynamic water quality modelling and uncertainty analysis of phytoplankton and nutrient cycles for the upper South Saskatchewan River. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 18239–18251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, A., Badruzzaman, A. B. M., & Ali, M. A. (2013). Assessing effect of climate change on the water quality of the Sitalakhya River using WASP model. Journal of Civil Engineering, 41, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azhoni, A., Holman, I., & Jude, S. (2017). Adapting water management to climate change: Institutional involvement, inert-institutional network and barriers in India. Global Environmental Change, 44, 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K. J., & Alcock, R. E. (2012). Modelling everything everywhere: a new approach to decision-making for water management under uncertainty. Freshwater Biology, 57, 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, R. J., Singh, U. K., Lal, M., Marchand, M., Sperna-Weiland, F. C., Singh, S. K., & Singh, M. P. (2016). Downscaling GCM data for climate change impact assessments on rainfall: a practical application for the Brahmani-Baitarani River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2015-499.

  • Delpla, I., Jung, A. V., Baures, E., Clement, M., & Thomas, O. (2009). Impacts of climate change on surface water quality in relation to drinking water production. Environment International, 35, 1225–1233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elshamy, M. E., Seierstad, I. A., & Sorteberg, A. (2009). Impacts of climate change on Blue Nile flows using bias-corrected GCM scenarios. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gareth, P., et al. (2014). Attitudes to water in South Asia. In Chatham House Report. Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, UK (p. 114). New Delhi, India: Vinset Advertising.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, M. K., & Ojha, C. S. P. (2011). Evaluation of linear regression methods as downscaling tools in temperature projections over the Pichola Lake Basin in India. Hydrological Processes, 25, 1453–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, N., Johnston, J., & Lindenschmidt, K. (2017). Impacts of climate change on the water quality of a regulated Prairie River. Water, 9, 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, O. (2016). Public–private partnerships for water in Asia: a review of two decades of experience. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33, 1, 4–30.

  • Kumar, P., Masago, Y., Mishra, B. K., & Fukushi, K. (2018). Evaluating future stress due to combined effect of climate change and rapid urbanization for Pasig-Marikina River, Manila. Groundwater for Sustainable Development., 6, 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masago, Y., Mishra, B. K., Jalilov, S. M., Kefi, M., Kumar, P., Dilley, M., & Fukushi, K. (2018). Future outlook of urban water environment in Asian cities: summary for decision makers (p. 28). Tokyo: United Nations University – Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016). Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science Advanced, 2(2), e1500323. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, B. K., & Herath, S. (2015). Assessment of future floods in the Bagmati River basin of Nepal using bias-corrected daily GCM precipitation data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20(8), 05014027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, G. J., Chapra, S. C., & Tao, H. (2006). QUAL2Kw—a framework for modelling water quality in stream and rivers using a genetic algorithm for calibration. Environmental Modeling Software, 21, 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J., Hussey, K., & McGlennon, S. (2013). Australian climate energy and water policies: conflicts and synergies. Australian Geographer, 44, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J., Purkey, D. (2011). Water Evaluation and Planning System. User guide for WEAP21; Stockholm Environment Institute, U.S. Center: Somerville, MA, USA; Available online: http://www.weap21.org/. Accessed on 1 April 2014.

  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nation. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.

  • UNEP. (2016). A snapshot of the world’s water quality: towards a global assessment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 162 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). (2015). World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, ST/ESA/SER.A/366.

  • United Nations Human Settlements Program (UN-HABITAT). (2015). The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN-ESCAP), The State of Asian and Pacific Cities 2015, Urban transformations shifting from quantity to quality. ISBN: (Volume) 978-92-1-132681-9.

  • United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP). (2017). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017. In Wastewater: the untapped resource. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Water. (2017). Wastewater the untapped resource. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017 (p. 198).

    Google Scholar 

  • USGCRP (2014) Walsh, J., D. Wuebbles, K. Hayhoe, J. Kossin, K. Kunkel, G. Stephens, P. Thorne, R. Vose, M. Wehner, J. Willis, D. Anderson, S. Doney, R. Feely, P. Hennon, V. Kharin, T. Knutson, F. Landerer, T. Lenton, J. Kennedy, and R. Somerville. Ch. 2: our changing climate. Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese T.C., Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, 19–67.

  • Whitehead, P. G., Barbour, E., Futter, M. N., Sarkar, S., Rodda, H., Caesar, J., Butterfield, D., Jin, L., Sinha, R., Nicholls, R., & Salehin, M. (2015). Impacts of climate change and socio-economic scenarios on flow and water quality of the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna (GBM) river systems: Low flow and flood statistics. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 17, 1057–1069.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the Water and Urban Initiative (WUI) project of the Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, United Nations University (UNU-IAS), Tokyo, Japan, for the financial and other logistic support in conducting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P. Numerical quantification of current status quo and future prediction of water quality in eight Asian megacities: challenges and opportunities for sustainable water management. Environ Monit Assess 191, 319 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7497-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7497-x

Keywords

Navigation