Skip to main content
Log in

Citizen science sampling programs as a technique for monitoring microplastic pollution: results, lessons learned and recommendations for working with volunteers for monitoring plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A citizen science microplastic monitoring method was developed to engage the public and quantify microplastic contamination at various sites along an approximately 550 km length of the Ottawa River from Lake Temiskaming to Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada. The volunteers filtered 100 L of river water through a 100-μm mesh at their desired location along the Ottawa River. All but one of the river samples (n = 43) contained microplastics, with the vast majority of microplastics identified as microfibers. Microplastic concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 0.41 microplastic pieces per litre. We noted numerous advantages in working with citizen scientists including actively engaging citizens in the research, ease of recruiting volunteers within the established Ottawa Riverkeeper network, and expanded spatial coverage at minimal additional costs. Despite these important advantages, there are some important considerations with citizen scientist sampling including the rare events where volunteers mislabelled sample sheets (e.g. labelling as control instead of river sample) and the relatively low volume of water (100 L) that the volunteers could easily sample using our methodology. Recommendations for future citizen science projects for freshwater microplastic research include utilising an established and engaged network, running both field and lab control samples (blanks) to obtain estimates of contamination with microplastic fibres, and increasing the amount of water filtered to obtain more reliable estimates of microplastic pollution in our freshwater ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P. J., Warrack, S., Langen, V., Challis, J. K., Hanson, M. L., & Rennie, M. D. (2017). Microplastic contamination in Lake Winnipeg, Canada. Environmental Pollution, 225, 223–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, A. P. W., Cristiansen, K. S., Bode, E. T., & Hoellein, T. J. (2018). A watershed-scale citizen science approach to quantifying microplastic concentration in a mixed land-use river. Water Research, 47, 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 243, 1427–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. A., Crump, P., Niven, S. J., Teuten, E., Tonkin, A., Galloway, T., & Thompson, R. (2011). Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 9175–9179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Consulting Engineer (C.C.E.). 2016. Gatineau has 1,300 combined sewer-stormwater overflows in a year [online]. Available at < https://www.canadianconsultingengineer.com/water-wastewater/gatineau-1300-combined-sewer-stormwater-overflows-year/1003403223/> [Accessed 11th April, 2018].

  • Campbell, S. H., Williamson, P. R., & Hall, B. D. (2017). Microplastics in the gastrointestinal tracts of fish and the water from an urban prairie creek. FACETS, 2, 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, R. A., Avlijas, S., Simard, M. A., & Ricciardi, A. (2014). Microplastic pollution in St. Lawrence river sediments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 71(12), 1767–1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghani, S., Moore, F., & Akhbarizadeh, R. (2017). Microplastic pollution in deposited urban dust, Tehran metropolis, Iran. Environmental Science Pollution, 24(24), 20360–20371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estahbanati, S., & Fahrenfeld, N. L. (2016). Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water. Chemosphere, 162, 277–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galgani, F., Hanke, G., & Maes, T. (2015). Global distribution, composition and abundance of marine litter. In M. Bergmann, L. Gutow, & M. Klages (Eds.), Marine Anthropogenic Litter (pp. 29–56). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. R. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3, e1700782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, D. J., Pondella, D. J., II, Freiwald, J., Schiff, K. C., Caselle, J. E., Shuman, C., & Weisberg, S. B. (2012). Comparing volunteer and professionally collected monitoring data from the rocky subtidal reefs of Southern California, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 3239–3257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2185-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google Maps. (2018). Ottawa River Valley. Available at https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1keY6HFXuoc8qAhUtYCVnEmjw67jFoYMO&ll=46.33389666017136%2C-77.10651934999999&z=7. Accessed 14 Jul 2018.

  • Hidalgo-Ruz, V., & Thiel, M. (2013). Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): a study supported by a citizen science project. Marine Environmental Research, 87–88, 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Ruz, V., & Thiel, M. (2015). The contribution of citizen scientists to the monitoring of marine litter. In M. Bergmann, L. Gutow, & M. Klages (Eds.), Marine Anthropogenic Litter (pp. 29–56). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, K. F., Lee, S. C., Chow, J. C., & Watson, J. G. (2003). Characterisation of PM 10 and PM 2.5 source profiles for fugitive dust in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 37(8), 1023–1032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton, L. C. M., van der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B., Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. (2017). River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611.

  • Leslie, H. A., Brandsma, S. H., van Velzen, M. J. M., & Vathaak, A. D. (2017). Microplastics en route: field measurements in the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota. Environmental International, 101, 133–142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Liu, H., & Chen, J. P. (2017). Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water Research, 137, 362–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. A., Garneau, D., Sutton, R., Chu, Y., Ehmann, K., Barnes, J., Fink, P., Papzissimos, D., & Rogers, D. L. (2016). Microplasti pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. Environmental Pollution, 218, 1045–1054.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masura, J., Baker, J., Foster, G. & Arthur, C. 2015. Laboratory methods for the analysis of microplastics in the marine environment: recommendations for quantifying synthetic particles in waters and sediments. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-48.

  • Murphy, F., Ewins, C., Carbonnier, F. & Quinn, B. (2016). Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) as a Source of Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment. Environmental Science & Technology 50(11), 5800-5808.

  • Ottawa Riverkeeper. (2018). Watershed Facts [online]. Available at https://www.ottawariverkeeper.ca/watershed-fact [Accessed 14th July 2018].

  • Plastics—the Facts. 2016. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data [online]. PlasticsEurope, 35 p. Available at https://www.plasticseurope.org/application/files/4315/1310/4805/plastic-the-fact-2016.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.

  • Rech, S., Macaya-Caquilpán, V., Pantoja, J. F., Rivadeneira, M. M., Kroeger Campodónico, C., & Thiel, M. (2015). Sampling of riverine litter with citizen scientists — findings and recommendations. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4473-y.

  • Sutton, R., Mason, S., Stanek, S. K., Willis-Norton, E., Wren, I. F., & Box, C. (2016). Microplastic contamination in the San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 109, 230–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talvitie, J., Mikola, A., Koistinen, A., & Setälä, O. (2017). Solutions to microplastic pollution – removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Water Research, 123, 401–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaire, J. C., Pomeroy, C., Herczegh, S. M., Haggard, O., & Murphy, M. (2017). Microplastic abundance and distribution in the open water and sediment of the Ottawa River, Canada, and its tributaries. FACETS, 2, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., & Lambert, S. (2018). Freshwater microplastics: emerging environmental contaminants? Frankfurt: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Ndungu, A. W., Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2017). Microplastics pollution in inland freshwaters of China: a case study in urban surface waters of Wuhan, China. Science of the Total Environment, 575, 1369–1374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, F. M., Tilley, R. M., Tyler, C. R., & Ormerod, S. J. (2019). Microplastic ingestion by riverine macroinvertebrates. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 68–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, B. G., Takada, H., Taylor, H., Ito, M., Hosoda, J., Allinson, M., Connell, S., Greaves, L., & McGrath, M. (2015). POPs monitoring in Australia and New Zealand using plastic resin pellets, and International Pellet Watch as a tool for education and raising public awareness on plastic debris and POPs. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 101, 137–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Ivar do Sul, J., Corcoran, P. L., Barnosky, A. D., Cearreta, A., Edgeworth, M., Gałuszka, A., Jeandel, C., Leinfelder, R., McNeill, J. R., Steffen, W., Summerhayes, C., Wagreich, M., Williams, M., Wolfe, A. P., & Yonan, Y. (2016). The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 13, 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziajahromi, S., Neale, P. A., Rintoul, L., & Leusch, F. D. L. (2017). Wastewater treatment plants as a pathway for microplastics: Development of a new approach to sample wastewater-based microplastics. Water Research, 112, 93–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun A. Forrest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forrest, S.A., Holman, L., Murphy, M. et al. Citizen science sampling programs as a technique for monitoring microplastic pollution: results, lessons learned and recommendations for working with volunteers for monitoring plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems. Environ Monit Assess 191, 172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7297-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7297-3

Keywords

Navigation