Skip to main content
Log in

Presence of pesticide residues on produce cultivated in Suriname

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural pesticides are widely used in Suriname, an upper middle-income Caribbean country located in South America. Suriname imported 1.8 million kg of agricultural pesticides in 2015. So far, however, national monitoring of pesticides in crops is absent. Reports from the Netherlands on imported Surinamese produce from 2010 to 2015 consistently showed that samples exceeded plant-specific pesticide maximum residue limits (MRLs) of the European Union (EU). Consumption of produce containing unsafe levels of pesticide residues can cause neurological disorders, and particularly, pregnant women and children may be vulnerable. This pilot study assessed the presence of pesticide residues in commonly consumed produce items cultivated in Suriname. Thirty-two insecticides (organophosphates, organochlorines, carbamates, and pyrethroids) and 12 fungicides were evaluated for their levels in nine types of produce. Pesticide residue levels exceeding MRLs in this study regarded cypermethrin (0.32 μg/g) in tomatoes (USA MRL 0.20 μg/g), lambda-cyhalothrin (1.08 μg/g) in Chinese cabbage (USA MRL 0.40 μg/g), endosulfan (0.07 μg/g) in tannia (EU MRL 0.05 μg/g), and lindane (0.02 and 0.03 μg/g, respectively) in tannia (EU MRL 0.01 μg/g). While only a few pesticide residues were detected in this small pilot study, these residues included two widely banned pesticides (endosulfan and lindane). There is a need to address environmental policy gaps. A more comprehensive sampling and analysis of produce from Suriname is warranted to better understand the scope of the problem. Preliminary assessments, using intake rate, hazard quotient, and level of concern showed that it is unlikely that daily consumption of tannia leads to adverse health effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS. (2013). Resultaten achtste volks-en woningtelling in Suriname (volume 1) demografische en sociale karakteristieken en migratie. (). Paramaribo, Suriname: Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek—Suriname.

  • Bajwa, U., & Sandhu, K. S. (2014). Effect of handling and processing on pesticide residues in food—a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(2), 201–220. doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0499-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, J. D., Umbach, D. M., Hoppin, J. A., Richards, M., Alavanja, M. C., Blair, A., & Kamel, F. (2014). Pesticide exposure and depression among male private pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(9), 984–991. doi:10.1289/ehp.1307450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C. J. et al (2013). Pesticide exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes: review of the epidemiologic and animal studies. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health.Part B, Critical Reviews, 16(3–4), 127–283. doi:10.1080/10937404.2013.783383.

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency. (2012). Procedures for sampling fresh fruit and vegetables. Retrieved from http://www.inspection.gc.ca/food/fresh-fruits-and-vegetables/food-safety/sampling-fresh-fruit-and-vegetables/eng/1353610539095/1353610619804.

  • Carvalho, F. P. (2006). Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environmental Science & Policy, 9(7–8), 685–692. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2005). ATSDR—PHA guidance manual—chapter 6: exposure evaluation: evaluating exposure pathways. Retrieved from http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/PHAManual/ch6.html#6.2.

  • De Nationale Assemblee van de Republiek Suriname. (n.d.). Bestrijdingsmiddelenwet. Retrieved from http://www.dna.sr/wetgeving/surinaamse-wetten/geldende-teksten-tm-2005/bestrijdingsmiddelenwet/.

  • Derlagen, C., et al (2013). Agricultural sector support in Suriname. Rome: IDB/FAO.

  • EU. (2016). EU pesticides database. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=product.selection&language=EN.

  • FAO. (1999). Recommended methods of sampling for the determination of pesticide residues for compliance with MRLs. Rome, Italy: FAO.

  • FAO. (2008). Good agricultural practices. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/prods/gap/.

  • FAO. (n.d.). Codex maximum residue limits for pesticides. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/waicent/faostat/Pest-Residue/pest-e.htm.

  • FAO, & WHO. (2009). In Sheffer M. (Ed.), Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

  • Global MRL Database. (2016). Global MRL database. Retrieved from https://www.globalmrl.com/db#query.

  • Harley, K. G., Huen, K., Aguilar Schall, R., Holland, N. T., Bradman, A., Barr, D. B., & Eskenazi, B. (2011). Association of organophosphate pesticide exposure and paraoxonase with birth outcome in Mexican-American women. PloS One, 6(8), e23923. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023923.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, R. W., & Reed, L. D. (1990). Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 5(1), 46–51. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IRIS US EPA. (1987). Gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH); CASRN 58-89-9. Washington DC, United States of America: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • IRIS US EPA. (1994). Endosulfan; CASRN 115-29-7. Washington DC, United States of America: U.S Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Keikotlhaile, B. M. et al (2010). Effects of food processing on pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables: a meta-analysis approach. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48(1), 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2009.10.031.

  • London, L., Beseler, C., Bouchard, M. F., Bellinger, D. C., Colosio, C., Grandjean, P., & Stallones, L. (2012). Neurobehavioral and neurodevelopmental effects of pesticide exposures. Neurotoxicology, 33(4), 887–896. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2012.01.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahabali, S., & Spanoghe, P. (2015). Risk assessment of pesticide usage by farmers in Commewijne, Suriname, South America: a pilot study for the Alkmaar and Tamanredjo regions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(3), 153. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4363-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries. (2013). The national agricultural innovation of the republic of Suriname. (). Paramaribo, Suriname: Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries.

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries. (2014). Bestrijdingsmiddelen import 1993–2013. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries. (2015a). Beplante arealen, productie en export van groenten. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries. (2015b). Productie van landbouwgewassen. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries. (2016). Pesticides import data 2015. Unpublished manuscript.

  • NIMOS. (2013). Second national communication to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. (). Paramaribo: Ministry of Labour, Technological Development and Environment.

  • NVWA. (2012). Residuen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen op groente en fruit: Overzicht van uitkomsten NVWA-inspecties januari 2010–december 2011. (). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nederlandse Voedsel en Waren Autoriteit Ministerie van Economische Zaken.

  • NVWA. (2013). Residuen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen op groente en fruit: Overzicht van uitkomsten NVWA-inspecties juli 2011–juni 2013. (). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nederlandse Voedsel en Waren Autoriteit Ministerie van Economische Zaken.

  • NVWA. (2014a). Residuen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen op groente en fruit: Overzicht van uitkomsten NVWA-inspecties januari 2011–juli 2013. Unpublished manuscript.

  • NVWA. (2014b). Residuen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen op groente en fruit: Overzicht van uitkomsten NVWA-inspecties januari 2012–december 2013. (). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit Ministerie van Economische Zaken.

  • NVWA. (2014c). Residuen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen op groente en fruit: Overzicht van uitkomsten NVWA-inspecties juli 2012–juni 2014. (). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit Ministerie van Economische Zaken.

  • NVWA. (2015). Residuen van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen op groente en fruit: Overzicht van uitkomsten NVWA-inspecties juli 2013–juni 2015. (). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nederlandse Voedsel en Waren Autoriteit Ministerie van Economische Zaken.

  • Stockholm Convention. (2015). Text of the convention. Retrieved from http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/Overview/TextoftheConvention/tabid/2232/Default.aspx.

  • US EPA. (1991). Chemical concentration data near the detection limit. USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. (2009). Persistent organic pollutants: a global issue, a global response. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/persistent-organic-pollutants-global-issue-global-response.

  • US EPA. (2016a). Setting tolerances for pesticide residues in foods. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-tolerances/setting-tolerances-pesticide-residues-foods.

  • US EPA. (2016b). SW-846 test method 8081-B: organochlorine pesticides by gas chromatography. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-8081b-organochlorine-pesticides-gas-chromatography.

  • US EPA. (2017). Exposures factors handbook 2011 edition (final report). Retrieved from https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=236252.

  • US FDA. (1999). In Makovi C. M., McMahon B. M. (Eds.), Pesticide analytical manual volume I (3rd ed.). USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration.

  • USDA. (2016). Sampling procedures for pesticide data program. USA: United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sauers, A. (2015). In Abdoel Wahid F. (Ed.), Endosulfan and lindane prohibition in Suriname. Paramaribo, Suriname.

  • Weber, J., Halsall, C. J., Muir, D., Teixeira, C., Small, J., Solomon, K., & Bidleman, T. (2010). Endosulfan, a global pesticide: a review of its fate in the environment and occurrence in the arctic. The Science of the Total Environment, 408(15), 2966–2984. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2016). Codex alimentarius: commodities. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/standards/pestres/commodities/en/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R24TW009570 and R24TW009561. We thank Micro Macro International Analytical Laboratory for assisting in the overseas transport of the samples, Dr. P. Bush for his leadership in the laboratory analysis, Ms. Carrie Williams from the Agricultural and Environmental Services Laboratory of The University of Georgia for the laboratory analysis, and Dr. A. Shankar for her advice on the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Abdoel Wahid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdoel Wahid, F., Wickliffe, J., Wilson, M. et al. Presence of pesticide residues on produce cultivated in Suriname. Environ Monit Assess 189, 303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6009-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6009-0

Keywords

Navigation