Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoring pasture variability: optical OptRx® crop sensor versus Grassmaster II capacitance probe

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimation of pasture productivity is an important step for the farmer in terms of planning animal stocking, organizing animal lots, and determining supplementary feeding needs throughout the year. The main objective of this work was to evaluate technologies which have potential for monitoring aspects related to spatial and temporal variability of pasture green and dry matter yield (respectively, GM and DM, in kg/ha) and support to decision making for the farmer. Two types of sensors were evaluated: an active optical sensor (“OptRx®,” which measures the NDVI, “Normalized Difference Vegetation Index”) and a capacitance probe (“GrassMaster II” which estimates plant mass). The results showed the potential of NDVI for monitoring the evolution of spatial and temporal patterns of vegetative growth of biodiverse pasture. Higher NDVI values were registered as pasture approached its greatest vegetative vigor, with a significant fall in the measured NDVI at the end of Spring, when the pasture began to dry due to the combination of higher temperatures and lower soil moisture content. This index was also effective for identifying different plant species (grasses/legumes) and variability in pasture yield. Furthermore, it was possible to develop calibration equations between the capacitance and the NDVI (R 2 = 0.757; p < 0.01), between capacitance and GM (R 2 = 0.799; p < 0.01), between capacitance and DM (R 2 = 0.630; p < 0.01), between NDVI and GM (R 2 = 0.745; p < 0.01), and between capacitance and DM (R 2 = 0.524; p < 0.01). Finally, a direct relationship was obtained between NDVI and pasture moisture content (PMC, in %) and between capacitance and PMC (respectively, R 2 = 0.615; p < 0.01 and R 2 = 0.561; p < 0.01) in Alentejo dryland farming systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig 5
Fig 6
Fig 7
Fig 8
Fig 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamchuk, V. I., Hummel, J. W., Morgan, M. T., & Udaphyaya, S. K. (2004). On the go soil sensor for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 44(1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, G. E., & Bransby, D. I. (1992). Observer variability for disk meter measurements of forage mass. Agronomy Journal, 84, 603–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama, T., & Kawamura, K. (2007). Grassland degradation in China: methods of monitoring, management and restoration. Japanese Society of Grassland Science, 53, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sport medicine. Sports Medicine, 26, 217–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, P., Trotter, M., Lamb, D., Wilson, B., Reid, N., Lockwood, P., & Koen, T. (2010). Using active optical sensing of biomass to investigate the effect of scattered trees on native perennial pastures. In: D. J. Eldridge & C. Waters (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Biennial Conference of the Australian Rangeland Society, Bourke. Perth: Australian Rangeland Society. 6 p.

  • Bausch, W. C., & Delgado, J. A. (2003). Ground-based sensing of plant nitrogen status in irrigated corn to improve nitrogen management. In: T. VanToai et al. (Eds.), Digital imaging and spectral techniques: Applications to precision agriculture and crop physiology (pp. 145–157). ASA Special Publication 66. Madison: ASA, CSSA, SSSA.

  • Braga, R., & Pinto, P. A. (2011). Agricultura de precisão: adopção & principais obstáculos. AGROTEC, 1(1), 84–88 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broge, N. H., & Leblanc, E. (2000). Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density. Remote Sensing of Environment, 76(2), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauduro, G. F., Carvalho, P., Barbosa, C., Lunardi, R., Pilau, A., Freitas, F., & Silva, J. (2006). Comparision of indirect methods for measuring forage mass under annual ryegrass ((Lolium Multiflorum Lam.)). Ciência Rural, 36, 1617–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. (2002). Information technology: the global key to precision agriculture and sustainability. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 36(2–3), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, T. S., Pinto, C. A., Nadezhdina, N., Kurz-Besson, C., Henriques, M. O., Quilhó, T., Cermak, J., Chaves, M. M., Pereira, J. S., & David, J. S. (2013). Root functioning, tree water use and hydraulic redistribution in Quercus suber trees: a modeling approach based on root sap flow. Forest Ecology and Management, 307, 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, G. E., Scott, J. M., & Vickery, P. J. (2013). Satellite derived evidence of whole farmlet and paddock responses to management and climate. Animal Production Science, 53(7–8), 699–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusseux, P., Moy-Hubert, L., Corpetti, T., & Vertes, F. (2015). Evaluation of SPOT imagery for the estimation of grassland biomass. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 38, 72–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efe Serrano, J. (2006). Pastagens do Alentejo: bases técnicas sobre caracterização, pastoreio e melhoramento. Universidade de Évora – ICAM (Ed.), Évora, Portugal: Gráfica Eborense, 165–178 (in Portuguese).

  • Ganguli, A., Vermeire, L., Mitchell, R., & Wallace, M. (2000). Comparison of four nondestructive techniques for estimating standing crop in shortgrass plains. Agronomy Journal, 92, 1211–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitelson, A. A. (2004). Wide dynamic range vegetation index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161(2), 165–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, M., Steyn-Ross, D., & Steyn-Ross, M. (1999). Estimating biomass for New Zealand pasture using optical remote sensing techniques. Geocarto International, 14, 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in Sports Medicine and Science. Sports Medicine, 30, 1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, N. J. (1991). Spatial heterogeneity and other sources of variance in sward height as measured by the sonic and HFRO sward sticks. Grass and Forage Science, 46, 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, M. G., & Nicholson, R. A. (1987). Evaluation of the forage disk method in mixed grass rangeland in Kansas. Journal of Range Management, 40, 467–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, W. M., Rennie, G. M., Dalley, D. E., Dynes, R. A., & Upsdell, M. P. (2010). Pasture mass estimation by the C-DAX Pasture meter: Regional calibrations for New Zealand. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium, pp. 233–238.

  • Kumhálová, J., Kumhála, F., Kroulík, M., & Matejková, S. (2011). The impact of topography on soil properties and yield and the effects of weather conditions. Precision Agriculture, 12(6), 813–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laca, E. A., Demment, M. W., Winckel, J., & Kie, J. G. (1989). Comparison of weight estimate and rising-plate meter methods to measure herbage mass of a mountain meadow. Journal of Range Management, 42(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte, A. S., Herrick, J. E., Rango, A., & Winters, C. (2010). Acquisition, orthorectification, and object-based classification of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for rangeland monitoring. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 76(6), 661–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques da Silva, J. R., Peça, J. O., Serrano, J. M., Carvalho, M. J., & Palma, P. M. (2008). Evaluation of spatial and temporal variability of pasture based on topography and the quality of the rainy season. Precision Agriculture, 9(4), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M., & Ess, D. (1997). The precision-farming guide for agriculturists. Moline: John Deere & Company. 117 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numata, I., Chadwick, O. A., Schimel, J. P., Galvão, L. S., & Soares, J. V. (2008). Evaluation of hyperspectral data for pasture estimate in the Brasilian Amazon using field and imaging spectrometers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(4), 1569–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povh, F. P., Molin, J. P., Gimenez, L. M., Pauletti, V., Molin, R., & Salvi, J. V. (2008). Comportamento do NDVI obtido por sensor óptico activo em cereais. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 43(8), 1075–1083 (in Portuguese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, A. R., & Sorooshian, S. (1994). A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 48(2), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, G., Bayn, R., & West, N. (1980). Evaluation of double-sampling estimators of subalpine herbage production. Journal of Range Management, 33, 300–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, S., Mudge, P. L., Wallace, D. F., Campbell, D. I., Woodward, S. L., Walla, A. M., & Schipper, L. A. (2014). CO2 emissions following cultivation of a temperate permanent pastures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 184, 21–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. A., Rotz, C. A., Fultz, S. W., & Rayburn, E. B. (2001). Estimating forage ass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter, and pasture ruler. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1281–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellberg, J., Hill, M. J., Roland, G., Rothmund, M., & Braun, M. (2008). Precision agriculture on grassland: applications, perspectives and constraints. European Journal of Agronomy, 29(2–3), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L. A., Parfitt, R. L., Fraser, S., Littler, R. A., Baisden, W. T., & Ross, C. (2014). Soil order and grazing management effects on changes in soil C and N in New Zealand pastures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 184, 67–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scrivner, J. H., Center, D. M., & Jones, M. B. (1986). A rising plate meter for estimating production and utilization. Journal of Range Management, 39, 475–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddaiu, G., Porcua, G., Ledda, L., Roggero, P. P., Agnelli, A., & Cortic, G. (2013). Soil organic matter content and composition as influenced by soil management in a semi-arid Mediterranean agro-silvo-pastoral system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 167, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, J. M., Peça, J. M., Palma, P. M., Marques da Silva, J. R., & Carvalho, M. (2009). Calibração e validação de um medidor de capacitância num projecto de agricultura de precisão em pastagens. Revista das Ciências Agrárias, 32(2), 85–96 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, J., Peça, J., Marques da Silva, J., & Shahidian, S. (2011). Calibration of a capacitance probe for measurement and mapping of dry matter yield in Mediterranean pastures. Precision Agriculture, 12, 860–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, J., Peça, J., Silva, J. M., & Shahidian, S. (2014a). Avaliação de tecnologias para aplicação diferenciada de fertilizantes: novos conceitos de gestão em pastagens permanentes. Revista das Ciências Agrárias, 37(3), 253–269 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, J., Peça, J., Silva, J. M., & Shahidian, S. (2014b). Aplicação de fertilizantes: tecnologia, eficiência energética e ambiente. Revista das Ciências Agrárias, 37(3), 270–279 (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow, S. (1984). A simple disc meter for measurement of pasture height and forage bulk. Journal of Range Management, 37, 94–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, M. (2010). Precision agriculture for pasture, rangeland and livestock systems. Proceedings of 15th Australian Gronomy Conference “Food Security from Sustainable Agriculture”, Lincoln, New Zealand, 15th–18th November.

  • Trotter, M. G., Schneider, D., Lamb, D., Edwards, C., & McPhee, M. (2012). Examining the potential for active optical sensors to provide biomass estimation in improved and native pastures. Proceedings of the 16th Australian Agronomy Conference "Capturing Opportunities and Overcoming Obstacles in Australian Agronomy", University of New England 14th–18th October, Australia.

  • Tsutsumi, M., & Itano, S. (2005). Variant of estimation method of above-ground plant biomass in grassland with gamma model 1. Use of an electronic capacitance probe. Grassland Science, 51, 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, P. J., & Nicol, G. R. (1982). An improved electronic capacitance meter for estimating pasture yield: construction details and performance tests. Animal Research Laboratories Technical, 9, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virkajarvi, P. (1999). Comparison of three indirect methods for prediction of herbage mass on timothy-meadow fescue pastures. Soil and Plant Science, 49, 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAAM, Departamento de Engenharia Rural, Universidade de Évora, P.O. Box 94, 7002-554, Évora, Portugal

    João M. Serrano, Shakib Shahidian & José Rafael Marques da Silva

Authors
  1. João M. Serrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shakib Shahidian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José Rafael Marques da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João M. Serrano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serrano, J.M., Shahidian, S. & Marques da Silva, J.R. Monitoring pasture variability: optical OptRx® crop sensor versus Grassmaster II capacitance probe. Environ Monit Assess 188, 117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5126-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5126-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation