Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of development on water quality for seven streams in North Carolina

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, baseflow and storm discharges were monitored in seven watersheds of varying development density to document the effects of development on stream water quality. In addition, two of the watersheds contained package wastewater treatment facilities, which were evaluated as an alternative to residential on-site septic systems. Monthly grab samples of baseflow and flow-proportional samples of storm event discharge were collected and analyzed for nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment, and bacteria. For the five watersheds without wastewater treatment facilities, a significant linear relationship was documented between fecal coliform and enterococci levels in baseflow samples and the percentage of residential or impervious area. For the two watersheds with wastewater discharge, bacteria levels were significantly greater than those from the two relatively undeveloped watersheds. These results indicate that bacteria levels increased with increasing residential development even if many of the septic systems were replaced by a community wastewater treatment system. Computed annual export rates for ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) were correlated to the percentage of impervious surfaces in the watersheds, while the rates for other nitrogen forms, total phosphorus, and total suspended sediment were not. Annual export rates from the two mostly undeveloped watersheds were greater than a compilation of rates for undeveloped areas across the USA. Export from the four watersheds with more than 68 % residential land use was less than those reported from local and national studies of residential areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, M., & Prescott, C. (1999). The endangered species act enters the urban landscape: can Portland streams sustain salmon? In R. Sakrison & P. Sturtevant (Eds.), Watershed management to protect declining species (pp. 95–98). Seattle: American Water Resources Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. B., & Jackson, C. R. (1997). Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. Journal American Water Resources Association, 33(5), 1077–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, D. W., Paul, M. J., Purcell, A. H., Barbour, M. T., Rankin, E. T., & Resh, V. H. (2009). Assessment tools for urban catchments: developing stressor gradients. Journal American Water Resources Association, 45(2), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T. J., & Somers, W. P. (1969). Discharge measurement at gaging stations. in techniques of water resources investigations of the USGS. Washington: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, L. B., Hales, J. C., Carey, E. S., Loucaides, S., Rowland, K. R., & Nearhoof, J. E. (2006). Shellfish closures in southwest Brunswick County, North Carolina: septic tanks vs storm-water runoff as fecal coliform sources. Journal Coastal Research, 22(2), 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Mueller, D. K., & Mast, M. A. (2000). Nutrient concentrations and yields in undeveloped stream basins of the United States. Journal American Water Resources Association, 36(4), 849–860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, C. B., Kolka, R. K., & Thompson, J. A. (2004). Water quality in agricultural, urban, and mixed land use watersheds. Journal American Water Resources Association, 40(6), 1593–1601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuffney, T.F., Harned, D.A., and Giddings, E.M. 2004. Effects of urbanization on the condition of streams in the Piedmont of North Carolina—responses of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages: AGU 2004 Fall Meeting, December 13–17, 2004, San Francisco, California: Supplement to Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, v. 85, no. 47, B11B-0146.

  • Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L. S., & Greenberg, A. R. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. S., Steiner, J. L., Endale, D. M., Stuedemann, J. A., Schomberg, H. H., Franzluebbers, A. J., & Wilkinson, S. R. (2000). The relationship of land use practices to surface water quality in the Upper Oconee Watershed of Georgia. Forest Ecological Management, 128, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., & Crawford, J. K. (1994). Effects of land use water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia, 294, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Line, D. E., & White, N. M. (2007). Effects of development on runoff and pollutant export. Water Environment Research, 79(2), 185–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Line, D. E., White, N. M., Osmond, D. L., Jennings, G. D., & Mojonnier, C. B. (2002). Pollutant export from various land uses in the upper Neuse River Basin. Water Environment Research, 74(1), 100–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Line, D. E., White, N. M., Kirby-Smith, W. W., & Potts, J. D. (2008). Fecal coliform export from four coastal north carolina areas. Journal American Water Resources Association, 44(3), 606–617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., Williams, K. E., Esham, E. C., & Lowe, R. P. (2000). Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecological Applications, 10(4), 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C. W., Horner, R. R., Karr, J. R., Mar, B. W., & Welch, E. B. (1997). Effects of urbanization on small streams in the puget sound lowland ecoregion. Watershed Protection Techniques, 2(4), 485–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNett, J. K., Hunt, W. F., & Osborne, J. A. (2010). Establishing stormwater BMP evaluation metrics based upon ambient water quality associated with benthic macroinvertebrate populations. Journal Environmental Engineering, 136(5), 535–541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E. (1999). Sediment budget of a mixed use urbanizing watershed. In R. Sakrison & P. Sturtevant (Eds.), Watershed management to protect declining species (pp. 469–472). Seattle: American Water Resources Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. M., Webb, B. W., Walling, D. E., & Leeks, G. J. L. (1999). Estimating the suspended sediment loads of rivers in the LOIS study area using infrequent samples. Hydrology Processes, 13, 1035–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueler, T. (1994). The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques, 1(3), 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. (1976). Quality criteria for water. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.

  • US EPA. (1983). Results from the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program. Vol. I Final Report. Water Planning Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.

  • US Geologic Survey (USGS). (1982). Water quality of north carolina streams. Water Supply Paper Number 2185 A-S. U.S. Geological Survey. Alexandria, VA.

  • US Geologic Survey (USGS). (1999). The quality of our nation's waters—nutrients and pesticides. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1225. U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, CO.

  • Walling, D. E., & Webb, B. W. (1985). Estimating the discharge of contaminants to coastal waters by rivers: some cautionary comments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 16(12), 488–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. (1999). Sustainable urban and regional design: the South Dade watershed project. In R. Sakrison & P. Sturtevant (Eds.), Watershed management to protect declining species (pp. 457–460). Seattle: American Water Resources Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. E. Line.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Line, D.E. Effect of development on water quality for seven streams in North Carolina. Environ Monit Assess 185, 6277–6289 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-3024-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-3024-z

Keywords

Navigation