Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of a constructed wetland and pond system upon shallow groundwater quality

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructed wetland (CW) and constructed pond (CP) are commonly utilized for removal of excess nutrients and certain pollutants from stormwater. This study characterized shallow groundwater quality for pre- and post-CW and CP system conditions using data from monitoring wells. Results showed that the average concentrations of groundwater phosphorus (P) decreased from pre-CW to post-CW but increased from pre-CP to post-CP. The average concentrations of groundwater total Kjeldahl nitrogen and ammonium (\( {\mathrm{NH}}{_4^{ + }} \)) increased from pre-CW (or CP) to post-CW (or CP), whereas the average concentrations of groundwater arsenic (As), chromium, nickel, and zinc (Zn) decreased from pre-CW to post-CW regardless of the well locations. Variations of groundwater cadmium, copper, and Zn concentrations were larger in pre-CP than in post-CP and had a tendency to decrease from pre-CP to post-CP. In general, the average concentrations of groundwater aluminum and manganese decreased and of groundwater calcium, iron, magnesium, and sodium increased from pre-CP to post-CP. The average values of water levels (depth from the ground surface), redox potential, and conductance decreased and of chloride and sulfate (\( {\mathrm{SO}}{_4^{{ - 2}}} \)) increased after the wetland and pond were constructed regardless of the well locations. Results further revealed that there were significant differences (α = 0.05) between the pre- and post-CW (or CP) for redox potential, water level, and As. This study suggests that the CW–CP system had discernible effects on some of the shallow groundwater quality constituents. This information is very useful for fully estimating overall performance of stormwater treatment with the CW–CP system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babatunde, A. O., Zhao, Y. Q., O'Neill, M., & O'Sullivan, B. (2008). Constructed wetlands for environmental pollution control: a review of developments, research and practice in Ireland. Environmental International, 34, 116–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boniol, D. (1996) Summary of groundwater quality in the St. Johns River Water Management District. Special Publication SJ96-SP13. St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Florida, 32178

  • Canter, L. W. (1996). Nitrates in groundwater (p. 263). New York: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crites, R. W., Dombeck, G. D., Watson, R. C., & Williams, C. R. (1997). Removal of metals and ammonia in constructed wetlands. Water Environment Research, 69(2), 132–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R. H., & Knight, R. L. (1996). Treatment wetlands. Chelsea: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber, G., Leroch, K., Pressl, A., Rohrhofer, R., & Haberl, R. (2008). A two-stage subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland for high-rate nitrogen removal. Water Science and Technology, 57, 1881–1887.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obarska-Pempkowiak, H., & Klimkowska, K. (1999). Distribution of nutrients and heavy metals in a constructed wetland system. Chemosphere, 39, 303–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ou, W. S., Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., & Lin, H. T. (2006). Performance of a constructed wetland-pond system for treatment and reuse of wastewater from campus buildings. Water Environment Research, 78, 2369–2376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Y., Luo, S. M., & Cui, L. H. (2010). Estimation of nitrogen dynamics in a vertical-flow constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering, 37, 453–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SJRWMD (St. Johns River Water Management District). 2010. Field standard operating procedures for surface water sampling St. Johns River Water Management District 4049 Reid Street Palatka, Florida 32177. Department of Water Resources Division of Environmental Sciences Division of Laboratory Services.

  • Steinmetz, A., & Livingston-Way, P. (2009) Edgefield regional stormwater treatment (RST) facility: tri-county agricultural area. Water quality draft summary, June 2009. St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, FL 32178

  • Tang, S. (1993). Experimental study of a constructed wetland for treatment of acidic wastewater from an iron mine in China. Ecological Engineering, 2, 253–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, A., Molle, P., Boutin, C., & Salgot, M. (2009). Impact of design and operation variables on the performance of vertical-flow constructed wetlands and intermittent sand filters treating pond effluent. Water Research, 43, 1851–1858.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal, J. (2005). Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering, 25, 478–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the former colleagues from the St. Johns River Water Management for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Ouyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ouyang, Y. Effects of a constructed wetland and pond system upon shallow groundwater quality. Environ Monit Assess 185, 4245–4259 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2865-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2865-9

Keywords

Navigation