Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical forms and ecological risk of arsenic in the sediment of the Daliao River System in China

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemical forms and ecological risk of As were characterized in the sediment of the Daliao River System (DRS), which has been affected by long-term intensive industrial, urban, and agricultural activities. Twenty-seven samples of surface sediment were collected and analyzed for total As content and that of its chemical forms. The results indicated that the average total As content in the sediment was 9.83 mg kg − 1 but that the levels ranged from 1.57 to 83.09 mg kg − 1. At the sites near cities, mining sites, and the estuary of the DRS, it is likely that adverse effects on aquatic organisms occur, due to As levels in the sediment that are often higher than the threshold effect level and occasionally higher than the probable effect level. A selectively sequential extraction indicated that the majority of As in the sediment was bound to Fe oxides (62.1%), with moderate proportions of residual As (19.8%), specifically adsorbed As (17.9%), and a low proportion of non-specifically adsorbed As (1.1%). In addition, the content of Fe in the sediment was positively and significantly correlated with the contents of amorphous and crystalline Fe oxide-bound As, confirming the crucial role of Fe oxides in immobilizing high amounts of As in superficial environments. The average molar ratio of As to Fe was 1.18 × 10 − 4 in the surface sediment of the DRS, similar to that of natural Fe oxides, but much lower than that of synthesized Schwertmannite. Therefore, the release of As under reduced and low pH conditions can cause serious problems for water resources and for living organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asta, M. P., Cama, J., Martínez, M., & Giménez, J. (2009). Arsenic removal by goethite and jarosite in acidic conditions and its environmental implications. Journal of Hazardous Material, 171, 965–972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, S. D. (1999). Measurement of organic matter content in soil. In S. D. Bao, R. F. Jiang, & C. G. Yang (Eds.), Analysis of agri-chemistry in soil (3rd Edn., pp. 34–35). Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belzile, N., & Tessier, A. (1990). Interaction between arsenic and iron oxyhydroxides in lacustrine sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 54, 103–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, J. M., & Patrick, W. H. (1987). Fixation, transformation, and mobilization of arsenic in sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 21, 450–459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Çevik, F., Göksu, M. Z. L., Derici, O. B., & Fındık, Ö. (2009). An assessment of metal pollution in surface sediments of Seyhan dam by using enrichment factor, geoaccumulation index and statistical analyses. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 152, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, D. C., & Peterson, P. J. (1987). Global cycling of arsenic. In T. C. Hutchinson, & K. M. Meema (Eds.), Lead, mercury, cadmium and arsenic in the environment (pp. 279–302). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vitre, R., Belzile, N., & Tessier, A. (1991). Speciation and adsorption of arsenic on diagenetic iron oxyhydroxides. Limnology and Oceanography, 36, 1480–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzombak, D. A., & Morel, F. M. M. (1990). Surface complexation modeling: Hydrous ferric oxide. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

  • Edwards, M. (1994). Chemistry of arsenic removal during coagulation and Fe–Mn oxidation. Journal American Water Works Association, 86, 64–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filgueiras, A. V., Lavilla, I., & Bendicho, C. (2002). Chemical sequential extraction for metal partitioning in environmental solid samples. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 4, 823–857.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, C. C., Davis, J. A., & Waychunas, G. A. (1993). Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: Part 2. Kinetics of arsenate adsorption and coprecipitation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57, 2271–2282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giménez, J., Martínez, M., Pablo, J., Rovira, M., & Duro, L. (2007). Arsenic sorption onto natural hematite, magnetite, and goethite. Journal of Hazardous Material, 141, 575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles-Macías, C., Schifter, I., Luch-Cota, D. B., Méndez-Rodríguez, L., & Hernández-Vázquez, S. (2006). Distribution, enrichment and accumulation of heavy metals in coastal sediments of Salina Cruz Bay, Mexico. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 118, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, S., Ji, J. F., & Johannesson, K. H. (2008). Evaluating mobilization and transport of arsenic in sediments and groundwaters of Aquia aquifer, Maryland, USA. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 99, 68–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, C. K., Malik, D. S., & Yadav, R. (2007). Metal fractionation study on bed sediments of Lake Nainital, Uttaranchal, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 130, 129–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liaoning Statistical Bureau (2006). Liaoning statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C., He, M. C., Zhou, Y. X., Guo, W., & Yang, Z. F. (2008). Distribution and contamination assessment of heavy metals in sediment of the Second Songhua River, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 137, 329–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, N. T., & Huang, P. M. (1981). Adsorption of arsenate by soils and its relation to selected chemical properties and anions. Soil Science, 131, 88–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lombi, E., Sletten, R. S., & Wenzel, W. W. (2000). Sequentially extracted arsenic from different size fractions of contaminated soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 124, 319–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. M., & Whitfield, M. (1983). The significance of the river input of chemical elements to the ocean. In C. S. Wong, E. Boyle, K. W. Bruland, J. D. Burton, & E. D. Goldberg (Eds.), Trace metals in seawater (p. 265). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matschullat, J. (2000). Arsenic in the geosphere—A review. The Science of the Total Environment, 249, 297–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999). Arsenic in drinking water. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. E., et al. (1982). Carbonate and gypsum. In A. L. Page, et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, part 2 (2nd Edn., pp. 181–197). Madison: ASA and SSSA, Agronomy Monograph 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, K. (2002). Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science, 296, 2143–2145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polizzotto, M. L., Kocar, B. D., Benner, S. G., Sampson, M., & Fendorf, S. (2008). Near-surface wetland sediments as a source of arsenic release to ground water in Asia. Nature, 454, 505–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shotyk, W., MacKenzie, A., & Norton, S. (2004). Archives of environmental contamination. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6, 417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002). A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 517–568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. L., MacDonald, D. D., Keenleyside, K. A., Ingersoll, C. G., & Field, J. (1996). A preliminary evaluation of sediment quality assessment values for freshwater ecosystems. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 22, 624–638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stüben, D., Berner, Z., Kappes, B., & Puchelt, H. (2001). Environmental monitoring of heavy metals and arsenic from Ag–Pb–Zn mining: A case study over two millennia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 70, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terlecka, E. (2005). Arsenic speciation analysis in water samples: A review of the hyphenated techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 107, 259–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. L., & Mulligan, C. N. (2008). Speciation and surface structure of inorganic arsenic in solid phases: A review. Environment International, 34, 867–879.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, W. W., Kirchbaumer, N., Prohaska, T., Stingeder, G., Lombi, E., & Adriano, D. C. (2001). Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Analytica Chimica Acta, 436, 309–323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunye Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Wang, P., Men, B. et al. Chemical forms and ecological risk of arsenic in the sediment of the Daliao River System in China. Environ Monit Assess 184, 2237–2245 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2113-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2113-8

Keywords

Navigation