Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dual-camera, high-resolution aerial assessment of pipeline revegetation

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy-extraction results in significant disturbance to rangelands in Wyoming and other western US states. Although reclamation is required by law, US General Accounting Office reports from 1999 and 2005 are clear that affected government agencies have—over much of the past decade—had difficulty accomplishing mandated environmental monitoring of extraction-related disturbance. We evaluated two pipeline rights of way (ROW) using nested images (1- or 2- with 13- or 20-mm ground sample distance (GSD)) acquired during Very-Large Scale Aerial (VLSA) surveys. Aerial monitoring allowed for the collection of large numbers of geocoded samples, and for subsequent cover measurements using methods with demonstrated accuracy equal to that of conventional ground-based methods. Both pipelines had vegetative-cover deficiencies relative to their Plan of Development (POD) requirements. Using bare ground and ground-cover measurements from the higher-resolution imagery, we present a spatial representation of each pipeline ROW that allows quick identification of sections of the ROW that may need further reclamation action to meet POD standards. We also present aerial monitoring costs. We recommend VLSA pipeline surveys as a means for facilitating required environmental monitoring and for addressing the monitoring backlog that has developed with increased energy-extraction activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, N., & Stocking, M. (1987). A rapid method for assessing rates of soil erosion from rangeland: An example from Botswana. Journal of Range Management, 40, 460–466. doi:10.2307/3899612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Environment (2004). Reclamation criteria for wellsites, batteries and associated facilities: Draft. Assessment protocol, (Vol. II) Retrieved from http://www.nicholsenvironmental.com/_doclibrary/upstream_criteria_vol_2_criteria.pdf.

  • Aldrich, R. C., Bailey, W. F., & Heller, R. C. (1959). Large scale 70 mm color photography techniques and equipment and their application to a forest sampling problem. Photogrammetric Engineering, 25, 747–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, H. (2007). Statement of Henri Bisson, Bureau of Land Management Committee on House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources and the Subcommittee on Parks, Forests and Public Lands Oversight hearing on Oil and Gas Impacts on Public Lands. BLM.

  • Booth, D. T. (1974). Photographic remote sensing techniques for erosion evaluations. M.S. Thesis, University of Nevada–Reno, Reno, NV.

  • Booth, D. T., & Cox, S. E. (2006). Very large scale aerial photography for rangeland monitoring. Geocarto, 21(3), 27–34. doi:10.1080/10106040608542390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., & Cox, S. E. (2008). Image-based monitoring to measure ecological change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 185–190. doi:10.1890/070095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., & Berryman, R. D. (2006a). Precision measurements from very large scale aerial digital imagery using ImageMeasurement, Laserlog, and Merge software applications. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112, 293–307. doi:10.1007/s10661-006-1070-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., & Berryman, R. D. (2006b). Point sampling digital imagery using ‘SamplePoint’. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 123, 97–108. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9164-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., Fifield, C., Phillips, M., & Williamson, N. (2005b). Image analysis compared with other methods for measuring ground cover. Arid Land Research and Management, 19, 91–100. doi:10.1080/15324980590916486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., & Johnson, D. E. (2005a). Detection-threshold calibration and other factors influencing digital measurements of bare ground. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 58, 598–604. doi:10.2111/05-060R1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. T., Cox, S. E., & Simonds, G. E. (2006c). Riparian monitoring using 2-cm GSD aerial photography. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 7, 636–648. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (US Department of the Interior). (2007). BLM oil and gas lease sale nets nearly $14.2 million, State of Wyoming to get half. News releases: June. Retrieved from http://www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/info/news_room/2007/06/06ogsale.html.

  • Cook, C. W., & Stubbendieck, J. (1986). Range research: Basic problems and techniques. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). (2004). Airworthiness certification of aircraft and related products. Order 8130.2F.

  • General Accounting Office (GAO). (1999). Major management challenges and program risks: Department of Interior. GAO/OCG-99-9. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/pas/cg99009.pdf.

  • General Accounting Office (GAO). (2005). Oil and gas development: Increased permitting activity has lessened BLM’s ability to meet its environmental protection responsibilities. GAO-05-418. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05418.pdf.

  • Howell Petroleum Corporation. (2003). Plan of development. WYW148827 (p. 47). Casper, WY: Casper Field Office, Bureau of Land Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Technical Team (ITT). (1996). Sampling vegetation attributes, interagency technical reference, report no. BLM/RS/ST-96/002+1730 (p. 163). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Applied Resources Science Center, Denver, CO.

  • Lost Creek Gathering Company. (2000). Plan of development. WYW147148 (p. 41). Lander, WY: Lander Field Office, Bureau of Land Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luscier, J. D., Thompson, W. L., Wilson, J. M., Gorham, B. E., & Dragut, L. D. (2006). Using digital photographs and object-based image analysis to estimate percent ground cover in vegetation plots. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 408–413. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[408:UDPAOI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Um, J. S., & Wright, R. (1998). A comparative evaluation of video remote sensing and field survey for revegetation monitoring of a pipeline route. The Science of the Total Environment, 215, 189–207. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00340-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, W. G. (1987). Evaluating revegetation success. In W. G. Vogel (Ed.), A manual for training reclamation inspectors in the fundamentals of soils and revegetation (chapter 7, pp. 48–63). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service and the Soil and Water Conservation Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Terrance Booth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Booth, D.T., Cox, S.E. Dual-camera, high-resolution aerial assessment of pipeline revegetation. Environ Monit Assess 158, 23–33 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0562-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0562-5

Keywords

Navigation