Abstract
The goal of restoring environmental health and qualities to Hamilton Harbour Great Lakes Area of Concern, an embayment at the western end of Lake Ontario, is considered to be achievable by the year 2015. Restoring Hamilton Harbour is a dynamic process that relies heavily on research and monitoring to direct remediation efforts. Three principle means of coordinating this research and monitoring include: research and monitoring workshops; a monitoring catalogue outlining both government and nongovernment initiatives; and an annual report written by a local community group. These tools increase the effectiveness of remedial actions by: (i) improving stakeholders' ability to track trends; (ii) allowing program decision-makers to utilize adaptive management techniques to continuously modify programs based on new results; (iii) integrating interdisciplinary fields, and (iv) increasing accountability. This paper describes in detail these tools used for coordinating research and monitoring in implementing the Remedial Action Plan of the Hamilton Harbour Great Lakes Area of Concern, along with lessons learned to assist other implementers who are considering similar programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bay Area Restoration Council (BARC): 2002, Toward Safe Harbours 2002 Report Card, Bay Area Restoration Council, Hamilton, Ontario.
Bay Area Restoration Council (BARC): 2003, Toward Safe Harbours: Progress Toward Delisting – Work Plan, Bay Area Restoration Council, Hamilton, Ontario.
Bay Area Restoration Council (BARC): 2004, >Toward Safe Harbours: Progress Toward Delisting – Fish and Wildlife, Bay Area Restoration Council, Hamilton, Ontario.
British Columbia Forest Service (BC): 2000, Adaptive Management Initiatives in the BC Forest Service. Available at http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/amhome/amhome.htm (accessed 10/20/2004).
Canada-Ontario: 2002, Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem, Canada.
Charlton, M. and Milne, J.: 2004, ‘Hamilton Harbour Water Quality Update’, in RAP Technical Team. Research and Monitoring Report: 2003 Season, May 2004, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, pp. 60–65.
Edge, T.: 2004, ‘Preliminary Investigations – Microbial Source Tracking with Escherichia coli in Hamilton Harbour’, in RAP Technical Team. Research and Monitoring Report: 2003 Season, May 2004, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, pp 90–91.
Hamilton Harbour RAP (HH RAP): 1992a, Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour: Environmental Conditions and Problem Definition. Second Edition of the Stage 1 Report. Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Hamilton Harbour RAP (HH RAP): 1992b, Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour: Goals, Options and Recommendations. Stage 2 Report, Volume 2 – Main Report. Burlington, ON, Canada.
Hamilton Harbour RAP (HH RAP): 1998, Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan. 1998 Status Report. Second Printing. Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Hamilton Harbour RAP Stakeholder Forum (HH RAP): 2003, Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour: Stage 2 Update 2002. Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Hamilton Harbour RAP Office: 2004, Hamilton Harbour RAP Monitoring Catalogue, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Holland, Susan: 1996, Hamilton Harbour Research and Monitoring Database: User Manual, Environment Canada – Ontario Region. Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
International Joint Commission, Great Lakes Water Quality Board (IJC): 1985, 1985 Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
International Joint Commission United States and Canada: 1972, Great Lakes Water Quality: Agreement, with Annexes and Texts and Terms of Reference, Between the United States of America and Canada: signed at Ottawa April 15, 1972, Windsor, ON.
International Joint Commission United States and Canada: 1978, Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978: Agreement, with Annexes and Terms of Reference, Between the United States of America and Canada, Signed at Ottawa November 22, 1978, Windsor, ON, Canada.
International Joint Commission United States and Canada (IJC): 1987, Revised Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978: Agreement, with Annexes and Terms of Reference, Between the United States and Canada, Signed at Ottawa November 22, 1978 and Phosphorus Load Reduction Supplement signed October 16, 1983: as Amended by Protocol Signed November 18, 1987. Windsor, ON, Canada.
International Joint Commission United States and Canada: 2004, Who We Are, Available at http://www.ijc.org/en/background/biogrcommiss.htm (accessed 09/09/2004).
Minns, C. K., Cairns, V. W., Randall, R. G. and Moore, J. E.: 1994, ‘An Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes' areas of concern’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51(8), 1804–1822.
Morris, R. D., Pekarik, C., Weseloh, D. V. C. and Quinn, J. S.: 2001, ‘Progress toward colonial waterbird population targets in Hamilton Harbour (1998–2000)’, Ontario Birds. 19(1), 12–25.
Rusmir-Woods, C.: 2005. ‘Windermere Arm Sediments'(working title), in RAP Technical Team. Research and Monitoring Report: 2004 Season, in preparation, Burlington, ON, Canada.
Whittle, D. M.: 2003, ‘Preliminary Investigations – Hamilton Harbour Contaminant Trend Monitoring Study’, in RAP Technical Team. Research and Monitoring Report: 2002 Season, March 2003, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, pp. 2–6.
Zeman, A. J. and Patterson, T. S.: 2003, ‘Preliminary Investigations – Contaminated Sediment Mapping, Windermere Arm, Hamilton Harbour’, in RAP Technical Team. Research and Monitoring Report: 2002 Season, March 2003, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, pp. 51–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, J.D., O'Connor, K. & Ranieri, J. Progress Toward Delisting a Great Lakes Area of Concern: The Role of Integrated Research and Monitoring in the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan. Environ Monit Assess 113, 227–243 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9082-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9082-8