Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sampling The Soil In Long-Term Forest Plots: The Implications Of Spatial Variation

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long-term monitoring of forest soils as part of a pan-European network to detect environmental change depends on an accurate determination of the mean of the soil properties at each monitoring event. Forest soil is known to be very variable spatially, however. A study was undertaken to explore and quantify this variability at three forest monitoring plots in Britain. Detailed soil sampling was carried out, and the data from the chemical analyses were analysed by classical statistics and geostatistics. An analysis of variance showed that there were no consistent effects from the sample sites in relation to the position of the trees. The variogram analysis showed that there was spatial dependence at each site for several variables and some varied in an apparently periodic way. An optimal sampling analysis based on the multivariate variogram for each site suggested that a bulked sample from 36 cores would reduce error to an acceptable level. Future sampling should be designed so that it neither targets nor avoids trees and disturbed ground. This can be achieved best by using a stratified random sampling design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baert, G., Vanmechelen, L. and Van Ranst, E.: 1998, ‘Critical review of soil sampling methods in the ICP Forests programme: Background document’, Forest Soil Co-ordinating Centre (FSCC), Gent, p. 19.

  • Blyth, J. F. and MacLeod, D. A.: 1978, ‘The significance of soil variability for forest soil studies in north-east Scotland’, J. Soil Sci. 29, 419–430.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T. C.: 1967, ‘Plantations on medieval rigg and furr cultivation strips. A study in Scoreby Wood York East Forest’, Forestry Commission Forest Record No. 62. HMSO, London.

  • Bourgault, G. and Marcotte, D.: 1991, ‘Multivariable variogram and its application to the linear model of coregionalization’, Math. Geol. 23, 899–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cape, J. N. and Lightowlers, P. J.: 1988, ‘Review of Throughfall And Stemflow Chemistry Data in the United Kingdom’, ITE Project TO7003el Final Report, ITE, Edinburgh.

  • Clark, H. M.: 1960, ‘Selion size and soil type’, Agric. Hist. Rev. 8, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, D.: 2000, ‘Environmental monitoring in British forests’, Forestry Commission Information Note 37. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.

  • Eyre, S. R.: 1955, ‘The curving plough strip and its historical implications’, Agric. Hist. Rev. 3, 80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. L: 1982, ‘Medieval Fields’, Shire Publications Ltd, Aylesbury.

  • ICP Forests: 2003, ‘Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Part IIIa. Sampling and analysis of soil’, Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products, Hamburg.

  • ICP Forests: 2004, ‘Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Part I. Mandate of ICP Forests and programme implementation’, Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products, Hamburg.

  • Kerry, R. and Oliver, M. A.: 2001, ‘Average variograms to guide soil sampling for land management’, Paper presented to 2001 U.K. Geostats Conference, Reading.

  • McBratney, A. B. and Webster, R.: 1981, ‘The design of optimal sampling schemes for local estimation and mapping of regionalized variables: 2 program and examples’, Comput. Geosci. 7, 335–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. A. and Webster, R.: 1987, ‘The elucidation of soil pattern in the Wyre Forest of the West Midlands, England. II. Spatial distribution’, J. Soil Sci. 38, 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. W., Baird, D. B., Cherry, M., Gilmour, A. R., Harding, S. A., Lane, P. W., Morgan, G. W., Murray, D. A., Soutar, D. M., Thompson, R., Todd, A. D., Tunnicliffe, W., G., Webster, R. and Welham, S. J.: 2002, GenStat Release 6.1 Reference Manual, Part 1 Summary, VSN International, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumbler, M. G.: 1996, ‘British Regional Geology. London and the Thames Valley’, HMSO, London.

  • Trafford, B. D. and Walpole, R. A.: 1975, ‘Drainage Design In Relation to Soil Series’, in A. J. Thomasson (ed.), Soils and field drainage, Soil Survey Technical Monograph No. 7, Harpenden, pp. 49–61.

  • Webster, R. and Oliver, M. A.: 1992, ‘Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties’, J. Soil Sci. 43, 497–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. and Oliver, M. A.: 2001, ‘Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists’, Wiley, Chichester.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Moffat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirwan, N., Oliver, M.A., Moffat, A.J. et al. Sampling The Soil In Long-Term Forest Plots: The Implications Of Spatial Variation. Environ Monit Assess 111, 149–172 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8219-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8219-0

Keywords

Navigation