Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship Between Bird Abundances and Landscape Characteristics: The Influence of Scale

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scale is important to consider when investigating effects of the environment on a species. Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data and landscape metrics derived from aerial photographs were evaluated to determine how relationships of bird abundances with landscape variables changed over a continuous range of 16 spatial scales. We analyzed the average number of birds per stop (1985–1994) for five songbird species (family Cardinalidae) for each of 50 stops on 198 BBS transects throughout six states in the Central Plains, USA. Land along each transect was categorized into six cover types, and landscape metrics of fractal dimension (a measure of shape complexity of habitat patches), edge density, patch density, and percent area were calculated, with principal components used to construct composite environmental variables. Associations of bird abundances and landscape variables changed in accordance with small scale changes. Abundances of three species were correlated with edge density and one with component I, which subsumes initial variables of patch density for urban, closed forest, open forest, and open country. Fractal dimension and component II (summarizing amount of closed forest versus open country) were associated with the most species. Correlation patterns of fractal dimension with northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and painted bunting (Passerina ciris) abundances were similar, with highest correlations at intermediate to small scales, suggesting indirectly that these species thrive in areas where local habitat conditions are most important. Multiscale analysis can provide insight into the spatial scale(s) at which species respond, a topic of intrinsic scientific interest with applied implications for researchers establishing protocols to assess and monitor avian populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blank, S., Seiter, C. and Bruce, P.: 2001, Resampling Stats in Excel, Resampling Stats Inc., Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhning-Gaese, K.: 1997, ‘Determinants of avian species richness at different scales’, J. Biogeogr. 24, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, D. T., Scott, T. A. and Rotenberry, J. T.: 1997, ‘Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California’, Conserv. Biol. 11, 406–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, S. P.: 2004, ‘Relationship of bird abundances and landscape characteristics at multiple scales’, M.S. Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certain, D. L.: 2000, ‘A multiscale analysis of nest-site choice, nest success, and population abundance in the scissor-tailed flycatcher’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, D. D.: 1969, ‘Habitat utilization by cardinals in central and peripheral breeding populations’, Can. J. Zool. 47, 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drolet, B., Desrochers, A. and Frotin, M.: 1999, ‘Effects of landscape structure on nesting songbird distribution in a harvested boreal forest’, Condor 101, 699–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flather, C. H. and Sauer, J. R.: 1996, ‘Using landscape ecology to test hypothesis about large-scale abundance patterns in migratory birds’, Ecology 71, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhlendorf, S. D., Woodward, A. J. W., Leslie, D. M. Jr. and Shackford, J. S.: 2002, ‘Multi-scale effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on lesser prairie-chicken populations of the US Southern Great Plains’, Landscape Ecol. 17, 617–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkin, S. L. and Linville, S. U.: 1999, ‘Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis)’, in: A. Poole and F. Gill (eds), The Birds of North America, no. 440, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar, S. J. and M’Closkey, R. T.: 1997, ‘Spatial scale and determination of species status of the green frog’, Conserv. Biol. 11, 670–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, J. L.: 1993, ‘Blue Grosbeak (Passerina caerulea)’, in: A. Poole and F. Gill (eds), The Birds of North America, no. 79, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopachena, J. G. and Crist, C. J.: 2000, ‘Macro-habitat features associated with painted and indigo buntings in northeast Texas’, Wilson Bull. 112, 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar, N. B. and Wiens, J. A.: 1990, ‘Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: A hierarchial framework for the study of heterogeneity’, Oikos 59, 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowther, P. E., Lanyon, S. M. and Thomspon, C. W.: 1999, ‘Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris)’, in: A. Poole and F. Gill (eds), The Birds of North America, no. 398, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFaden, S. W. and Capen, D. E.: 2002, ‘Avian habitat relationships at multiple scales in a New England forest’, For. Sci. 48, 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. J.: 1995, ‘FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure’, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-35, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K. and McComb, W. C.: 1995, ‘Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range’, Ecol. Monogr. 65, 235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. B., Miller, S. L. and Ralph, C. J.: 2002, ‘Multi-scale landscape and seascape patterns associated with marbled murrelet nesting areas on the U.S. west coast’, Landscape Ecol. 17, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. N., Books, R. P. and Croonquist, M. J.: 1997, ‘Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities’, Landscape Ecol. 12, 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A. S.: 1984, Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application, Springer Verlag, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. J., Jones, M. T., White, D., Hunsaker, C., Loveland, T., Jones, B. and Preston, E.: 1996, ‘Spatial partitioning of environmental correlates of avian biodiversity in the conterminous United States’, Biodivers. Lett. 3, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee, D. F.: 1959, ‘The breeding behavior of the painted bunting in southern Oklahoma’, Bird-Banding 30, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. B.: 1992, ‘Indigo bunting (Passerina cyanea)’, in: A. Poole and F. Gill (eds), The Birds of North America, No. 4, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribil, S. and Picman, J.: 1997, ‘The importance of using proper methodology and spatial scale in the study of habitat selection by birds’, Can. J. Zool. 75, 1835–1844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C. S., Bystrak, D. and Geissler, P. H.: 1986, ‘The breeding bird survey: Its first fifteen years 1965–1979’, USFWS Resource Publication no. 157, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J.: 2003, NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saab, V.: 1999, ‘Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forest: A hierarchical analysis’, Ecol. Appl. 9, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. L.: 1997, Resampling: The New Statistics, Resampling Stats Inc., Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarvin, K. A. and Garvin, M. C.: 2002, ‘Habitat and nesting success of blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata): Importance of scale’, Auk 119, 971–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S. A.: 2002, ‘Dickcissel (Spiza americana)’, in: A. Poole and F. Gill (eds), The Birds of North America, no. 703, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horssen, P. W., Schot, P. P. and Barendregt, A.: 1999, ‘A GIS-based plant prediction model for wetland ecosystems’, Landscape Ecol. 14, 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, P. D., Tubaro, P. L., Cardosa, J. M., Peterjohn, B. G., Herkert, J. R. and Cavalcanti, R. B.: 1999, ‘Conservation of grassland birds in the Western Hemisphere’, Stud. Avian Biol. 19, 2–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, M. I., Field, S. A., Tyre, A. J., Paton, D. and Possingham, H. P.: 2003, ‘Effects of landscape pattern on bird species distribution in the Mt. Lofty ranges, South Australia’, Landscape Ecol. 18, 413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A.: 1989, ‘Spatial scaling in ecology’, Funct. Ecol. 3, 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., Addicott, J. F., Case, T. J. and Diamond, J.: 1986, ‘Overview: The Importance of Spatial and Temporal Scale in Ecological Investigations’, in: J. Diamond and T. J. Case (eds), Community Ecology, New York, NY, pp. 145–153.

  • Wiens, J. A., Rotenberry, J. T., and Van Horne, B.: 1987, ‘Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: The effects of spatial scale’, Oikos 48, 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. L.: 1993, The Birds of Konza, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary D. Schnell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brennan, S.P., Schnell, G.D. Relationship Between Bird Abundances and Landscape Characteristics: The Influence of Scale. Environ Monit Assess 105, 209–228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-3694-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-3694-x

Keywords

Navigation