Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Connecting Community Action and Science to Combat Desertification: Evaluation of a Process

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Combating desertification requires the involvement of many people ranging from communities who experience the effects on a daily basis and scientists attempting to understand the biophysical and socio-economic causes and consequences of desertification, to developers and policy makers on all levels. In many instances, however, the understanding, approaches and actions of these different groups contradict rather than support one another. Over the period 2000 to 2002, a conference process undertaken in southern Africa brought together communities, scientists, and development workers to test the concept that they could connect and work together to combat desertification, given an appropriate framework. The conference was a success, and communities, scientists and developers did exchange experience, knowledge and information. Many lessons were learned, although some pitfalls were experienced. Time, funding, enhanced communication, and good will are the primary ingredients for ensuring that different sectors complement one another in their efforts to combat desertification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerbach, R.: 1995, ‘People, farming and research: How can science contribute to sustainable agricultural development in South Africa?’, S. Afr. J. Sci. 91(1), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, W. and Waters-Bayer, A.: 1999, ‘People and rangelands’, Haramata 35, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLM: 1994, International Symposium and Workshop on Desertification in Developed Countries: Why Can’t We Control It? US Bureau of Land Management and Environmental Protection Agency, Tucson, Arizona, 24–29 October 1994.

  • BLM: 1997, International Symposium and Workshop on Combating Desertification: Connecting Science with Community Action, US Bureau of Land Management and the International Arid Lands Consortium, Tucson, Arizona, 12–16 May 1997.

  • BLM: 2002, ‘Combating Desertification, An International Symposium, Rural Community Interaction, and Workshop Exploring Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification by Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense’, 8–10 April, Retrieved from http://des2002.az.blm.gov/homepage.htm.

  • CGIAR: 2000, ‘Whither the CG? Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research’, Haramata 36, 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G.: 2001, ‘Learning lessons from the South’, Haramata 39, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • DMI: 1995, ‘On the margins’, Desert Margins Initiative, ICRISAT, Haramata 27, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRFN: ‘Desertification 2002, Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification, Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense’, Retrieved from http://www.drfn.org.na/des2002.

  • DRFN: 2000a, Proceedings of Community Drylands Tourism Workshop, Gobabeb Training and Research Centre,6–10 April 2000, Desert Research Foundation of Namibia, Windhoek, pp. 44.

  • DRFN: 2000b, Alternative ways to combat desertification: Connecting community action with science and common sense, ‘First Steering Committee Meeting in Support of Community Participation’, NewsletterNo. 4, August 2000.

  • DRFN: 2001a, Proceedings: Communication Preparation Workshop for Desertification 2000–2002,2–7, November 2001 at Gobabeb Training and Research Centre, Desert Research Foundation of Namibia, Windhoek, pp. 28.

  • DRFN: 2001b, ’Alternative ways to combat desertification: Connecting community action with science and common sense’, Second Steering Committee Meeting in Support of Community Participation, NewsletterNo. 5, April 2001.

  • DRFN: 2001c, Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification: Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense, ‘Desertification 2002 Community Visit Update’, Newsletter No. 6, September 2001.

  • Huntington, H.P.: 2000, ‘Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications’, Ecolog. Appl. 10(5), 1270–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDRC: 1994, ‘Drylands research’, Haramata 22, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • IISD: 1997, ‘A summary report on the international symposium and workshop on combating desertification’, Sustainable Develop. 4(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiros, F.: 1994, ‘Integrating social and natural sciences,’ Haramata 22, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiga, A.: 1999, ‘Gao calls for help’, Haramata 34, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maseru: 1998, Southern African Development Community–Environment and Land Management Sector, Report on the SADC Multidisciplinary Scientific Technical Consultative Committee (MSTCC) Workshop, Hwange, Zimbabwe, 2–3, November 1998.

  • Mauro, F. and Hardison P.D.: 2000, ‘Traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities: International debate and policy initiatives’, Ecolog. Appl. 10(5), 1263–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S. J.: 2000, ‘Community-based conservation: Exploring positive feedback between economic development and conservation’, S. African J. Sci. 96, 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P.: 2001, Report of First Planning Visit by the Des2002 Secretariat in July–August 2001, Desert Research Foundation of Namibia, Windhoek, 13 pp.

  • Moser, P. and Wolf K.: 2002, Report of Second Planning Visit by Des2002 Secretariat in November, December 2001 and January 2002, Desert Research Foundation of Namibia, Windhoek, 35 pp.

  • Mouat, D. A. and McGinty, H. K. (eds.): 1998, ‘Combating desertification: Connecting science with community action. Proceedings: International symposium and workshop’, J. Arid Environ. 39, 97–340.

  • Napcod: 2001, Namibia’s Programme to Combat Desertification, Consortium Annual Report, January–December 2001.

  • Norton, J. B., Pawluk, R. R. and Sandor, J. A.: 1998, ‘Observation and experience linking science and indigenous knowledge at Zuni, New Mexico’, J. Arid Environ. 39, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OC: 1999, ‘Announcement and Call for Papers and Posters for an International Symposium, Rural Community Interaction and Workshop’, Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification: Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense, 8–20 April 2002, Organising Committee Desertification 2002, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 5.

  • OC: 2000, ‘Registration Information for an International Symposium, Rural Community Interaction and Workshop’, Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification: Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense,8–20 April 2002, Organising Committee Desertification 2002, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 13.

  • OC: 2001, ‘Third Announcement’, Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification: Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense, 8–20April 2002, Organising Committee Desertification 2002, Windhoek, 18 pp.

  • OC: 2002, ‘Abstracts’, Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification: Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense,8–20 2002, Organising Committee Desertification 2002, Windhoek, 60 pp.

  • ⊘ygard, R., Vedeld, T. and Aune, J.: 1999, ‘Good Practices in Drylands Management’, Noragric Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, 116 pp.

  • Seely, M. K.: 1998, ‘Can science and community action connect to combat desertification’? J. Arid Environ. 39, 267– 277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seely, M. K. and Moser, P.: 2002, ‘Degraded land in southern Africa–combining community action with science and common sense: Alternative ways to combat desertification’, Haramata 41, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely, M. K. and Wöhl, H.: 2002, ‘Research competence in combating desertification’, Agr. Rural Dev. 1, 57– 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely, M. K. and Wöhl, H.: 2004, ‘Connecting research to combating desertification’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 99, 23–32 (this volume).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H. P.: 1998, ‘Sustainable development of the Indian desert: The relevance of the farming systems approach’, J. Arid Environ. 39, 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, V. R.: 1999, ‘Ecology, people and the environment: A challenge to the educators of managers of drylands restoration’, Desert Control Bull. 34, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tvedten, I. and Hangula, L.: 1993, ‘The Oshakati Human Settlement Improvement Project: A Preliminary Socio-economic Assessment’, University of Namibia, Social Science Division Discussion Paper No. 1, 70 pp.

  • UNCBD: 1992, United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations, 25 pp.

  • UNCCD: 1996, United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa, Secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, 76 pp.

  • UNEP: No date, Protecting the Environment from Land Degradation, UNEP 24 pp.

  • UNFCCC: 1992, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations, 33 pp.

  • Van Rooyen, A. F.: 1998, ‘Combating desertification in the southern Kalahari: Connecting science with community action in South Africa’, J. Arid Environ. 39, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, V. (ed): 2002, Proceedings: Alternative Ways to Combat Desertification–Connecting Community Action with Science and Common Sense,8–20 April 2002, Desert Research Foundation of Namibia, pp 166.

  • Wenger, E.: 1998, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Seely.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seely, M., Moser, P. Connecting Community Action and Science to Combat Desertification: Evaluation of a Process. Environ Monit Assess 99, 33–55 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-004-3999-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-004-3999-1

Navigation