Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How time influences franchise contracts: the Spanish case

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article builds a simple theoretical model for the optimal expected length of a franchise contract. The main outcome is that fixed specific investment positively impacts contract duration confirming previous theoretical conjectures. Additionally, other variables such us the price–cost margin of the franchise, the brand name or the discount factor also play a relevant role. The empirical analysis using a large sample of franchises operating in Spain confirms the main conclusions of the model. However, the connection found between investment and duration, although statistically robust, is weak from an economic point of view. This result suggests the possibility that, in general, most franchisees are not in equilibrium because of the high standardization of this contract term across franchises. In these cases, the expectation of renewal is likely to be a crucial element of adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Guriev and Kvassov (2005) also consider the possibility of investment by both parties. In this case, the longer is the contract duration of the fixed term contract the higher is the seller’s share in the total instantaneous return to investments. The conclusion of the analysis is, therefore, equivalent.

  2. With respect to the rest of the parameters, it is important to note that the ratio of fixed cost over average absolute margin compatible with the equilibrium decreases as the discount factor increases. Additionally, the parameter representing the impact of experience (ρ) on present discounted outcomes has a negative impact on duration. That is, higher values of the parameter imply that the point of maximum profits is reached earlier. These parameters are assumed industry specific and encapsulated in the fixed effects in the empirical model.

  3. In some cases (mainly for contracts of 5 years of duration) the possibility of renewal is explicitly included in the contract. However, in order to be in accordance with the theoretical model, we are interested in the value of the variables at moment zero. In any case, as commented along the text, this possibility could be an essential factor of adjustment for the franchisee.

  4. In fact, the correlation between both variables is high for most sectors.

  5. There exist the possibility that investment numbers underestimate real investment more for those franchises requiring a small monetary amount because of the existence of implicit investments (e.g. managerial time). Unfortunately, data availability makes not possible to control for this possible bias.

References

  • Arruñada, B., Garicano, L., & Vázquez, L. (2001). Contractual allocation of decisions rights and incentives: The case of automobile distribution. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 17, 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arruñada, B., Garicano, L., & Vázquez, L. (2005). Completing contracts ex post: How car manufacturers manage car dealers. Review of Law and Economics, 1, 149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beales, H., & Muris, T. J. (1995). The foundations of franchise regulation: Issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance: Contracting, Organization, and Governance, 2, 157–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, A., & Carlton, D. (2001). The choice of organizational form in gasoline retailing ant the lost of laws that limit that choice. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J. S., Dark, F. H., & Weisbach, M. (1991). The economic effects of franchise termination laws. Journal of Law and Economics, 34, 101–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J. A., Misra, S., & Van Horn, L. (2006). Contract duration: Evidence from franchising. Journal of Law and Economics, 49, 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dnes, A. W. (1993). A case-study analysis of franchise contracts. Journal of Legal Studies, 22, 367–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dnes, A. W. (1996). The economics analysis of franchise contracts. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152, 297–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Herrera, A. (2006). La duración del contrato de distribución exclusiva. Valencia: Ed. Tirant lo Blanc.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Herrera, A. (2008). El impacto del tiempo en los contratos de franquicia y distribución exclusiva. Valencia: Ed. Tirant lo Blanc.

  • Guriev, S., & Kvassov, D. (2005). Contracting on time. American Economic Review, 95, 1369–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. (1987). Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets. American Economic Review, 77, 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. (1995). The economics of franchise contracts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2, 9–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, F., & Shaw, K. L. (1999). The dynamics of franchise contracting: evidence from panel data. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1041–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson, G. F., & Winter, R. A. (1985). The economics of franchise contracts. Journal of Law and Economics, 28, 503–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson, G. F., & Winter, R. A. (1994). Territorial rights in franchise contracts. Economic Inquiry, 32, 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, P., & Stiglitz, J. (1995). The role of exclusive territories in producers’ competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 26, 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (1998). Making new franchise systems work. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L., I. I. (1982). Franchise regulation: An economic analysis of state restrictions on automobile distribution. Journal of Law and Economics, 25, 125–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. This research is dedicated to our children: Lara and Rafael.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Llorca-Vivero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-Herrera, A., Llorca-Vivero, R. How time influences franchise contracts: the Spanish case. Eur J Law Econ 30, 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-009-9124-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-009-9124-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation