Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Banks are “special” financial institutions generating distinct corporate governance challenges. The present paper examines the relationship between two of the most pertinent corporate governance factors—that is, the size of the Board of Directors and the proportion of non-executive directors—and firm performance on a sample of 58 large European banks over the period 2002–2004. The empirical analysis embraces a number of bank-specific variables. Our results reveal that bank profitability is negatively related to the size of the Board of Directors, while the impact of Board composition, although positive in all models, is, in most cases, insignificant. The results are robust after controlling for firm-specific variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R., & Mehran, H. (2003). Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies? FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 123–142.

  • Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhavein, J., Berger, A., & Humphrey, D. (1997). The effects of megamergers on efficiency and prices: Evidence from a bank profit function. Board Of Governors Of the Federal Reserve System. Finance and Economic Discussion Series, 9.

  • Alexander, K. (2004). [CERF research programme in international financial regulation, Working Paper 17/2004]. Corporate governance and banking regulation: The regulator as stakeholder.

  • Allen, F., Herring, R. (2001). [Wharton Financial Institutions Center 01-29, 2001]. Banking regulation versus securities market regulation.

  • Allen, F., & Santomero, A. (1997). The theory of financial intermediation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21, 1461–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Santomero, A. (1999). [Wharton Financial Institutions Center 99-30-B, 1999]. What do financial intermediaries do?.

  • Barth, J., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2004). Bank regulation and supervision: What works best? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 205–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J., Caprio, G., Nolle, D. (2004). [US Treasury-Office of the US Comptroller of the Currency Department Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper 2004/1]. Comparative international characteristics of banking.

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (September 1998). Framework For Internal Control Systems In Banking Organisations.

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (September 1999). Enhancing Corporate Governance For Banking Organisations.

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (July 2005). Consultative document-enhancing corporate governance for banking organisations.

  • Baxter, T. (2003). Governing the financial or bank holding company: How legal infrastructure can facilitate consolidated risk management. Federal Reserve Bank of New York: Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 9(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B., & Butler, H. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of the directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1, 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer, 54, 921–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2001). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., & Thakor, A. (1993). Contemporary banking theory. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3, 2–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, B., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2004). [Stanford Law School Working Paper 237/2004]. Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from Korea.

  • Booth, J., Cornett, M., & Tehranian, H. (2002). Board of directors, ownership and regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1973–1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, P. (1989). Concentration and other determinants of bank profitability in Europe, North America and Australia. Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J., Coles, J., & Terry, R. (1994). Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics, 35, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J., & James, C. (1987). The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure: The case of banking. Journal of Law and Economics, 30, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, J., & Hickman, K. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cechetti, S. (1999). The future of financial intermediation and regulation: An overview. Federal Reserve Bank of New York: Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 5(8), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charkham, J. P. (1994). Keeping good company – a study of corporate governance in five countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J., McWilliams, V., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management, 27, 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Proposal for a Directive concerning the annual accounts of certain types of companies and consolidated accounts, COM (2004) 725 final – 2004/0250(COD).

  • Commission Recommendation 2004/913/EC of 14 December 2004 fostering an appropriate regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies, OJ L 385/55/29.12.2004.

  • Commission Recommendation 2005/162/EC, of 15 February 2005 on the role of non-executive or supervisory directors of listed companies and on the committees of the (supervisory) Board, OJ L 52/51/25.02.2005.

  • Communication of the Commission. [COM(1999)232, 11.05.1999]. Financial services: Implementing the framework for financial services – action plan.

  • Corrigan, G. (1982). [Annual report essay]. Are banks special?.

  • Coughlan, A., & Schmidt, R. (1985). Executive compensation, managerial turnover and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromme, G. (2005). Corporate governance in Germany and the German corporate governance code. Corporate Governance, 13, 362–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahya, J., McConnell, J., & Travlos, N. (2002). The Cadbury Committee, corporate performance, and top management turnover Journal of Finance, 57, 461–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C., et al. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C., & Dalton, D. (1992). The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (1996). Risk and regulation in global securities markets. John Willey & Sons.

  • Davies, H. (1998). [Henry Thorton Lecture, City University Business School, 04.11.1998]. Why regulate?.

  • De Andres, P., Azofra, V., Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate governance in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance, 13, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bandt, O., Hartmann, P. (2000). [European Central Bank Working Paper No 35/2000]. Systemic risk: A survey..

  • Dehaene, A., De Vuyst, V., & Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate performance and board structure in Belgian companies. Long Range Planning, 34, 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E. (2002). Does deposit insurance increase banking system stability? An empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49, 1373–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Kane, E. (2002). Deposit insurance around the globe: Where does it work? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1998). Law, finance and firm growth. Journal of Finance, 53, 2107–2137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, D. (2001). Twenty-five years of corporate governance research...and counting. Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D., & Dybvig, P. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drobetz, W., Schillhofer, A., & Zimmermann, H. (2004). Corporate governance and expected stock returns: Evidence from Germany. European Financial Management, 10, 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, J. J. (2004). The German two-tier board and the German corporate governance code. European Business Law Review, 1139–1164.

  • Duca, J., & McLaughlin, M. (1990). Developments affecting the profitability of commercial banks. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 76(7), 477–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. (1987). Directors aren’t doing their jobs. Fortune, 117–119.

  • Edwards, J., & Fischer, K. (1994). Banks, finance, and investment in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank. (October 2005). EU banking structures.

  • European Commission. (2005). [Second Consultation by the Services of the Internal Market Directorate General, MARKT/13.05.2005]. Fostering an appropriate regime for shareholders’ rights.

  • Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983a). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983b). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch Ratings Special Report. (2005). [04.04.2005]. The framework for corporate governance in major European banking systems.

  • Fries, S., & Taci, A. (2005). Cost efficiency of banks in transition: Evidence from 289 banks in 15 post-communist countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furfine, C. (2001). Banks as monitors of other banks: Evidence from the overnight federal funds market. The Journal of Business, 74(1), 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein, D. (1984). Group in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, C., et al. (1998). Financial regulation: Why, how and where now? Routledge.

  • Gorton, G., & Pennacchi, G. (1990). Financial intermediaries and liquidity creation. Journal of Finance, 45, 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, G., & Winton, A. (2002). [Wharton Financial Institutions Center 02-28, 2002]. Financial Intermediation.

  • Grammatikos, T., & Saunders, A. (1990). Additions to bank loan-loss reserves: Good news or bad news? Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

  • Helland, E., & Sykuta, M. (2005). Who’s monitoring the monitor? Do outside directors protect shareholders’ interests? The Financial Review, 40, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (1988). The determinants of board composition. Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2003). Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 7–26.

  • Herring, R., & Santomero, A. (2000). [Wharton Financial Institutions Center 00-34, 2000]. What is optimal financial regulation?.

  • High Level Group of Company Experts. (2002). [04.11.2002]. Report on a modern regulatory framework for company law in Europe.

  • Holthausen, R., & Larcker, D. (1993). Boards of directors, ownership structure and CEO compensation, organizational structure and financial performance. Unpublished Paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA.

  • Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., & Qian, Y. (2003). Incentive features is CEO compensation in the banking industry. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 109–121.

  • Johnson, M., Daily, C., & Ellstrand, A. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 409–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, C., & Santos, J. (2005). Allocating bank regulatory powers: Lender of last resort, deposit insurance and supervision. European Economic Review, 49, 2107–2136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap, A., Rajan, R., & Stein, J. (2002). Banks as liquidity providers: An explanation for the coexistence of lending and deposit taking. Journal of Finance, 57, 33–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., & Santomero, A. (1993). Forecasting required loan-loss reserves. Journal of Economics and Business, 45, 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10, 703–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Silanes, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and capital valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Rosenstein, S., Rangan, N., & Davidson III W. (1992). Board composition and shareholder wealth: The case of management buyouts. Financial Management, 21, 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (2004). [World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3404/2004]. The corporate governance of banks: A concise discussion of concepts and evidence.

  • Levine, R., Loayza, N., & Beck, T. (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 31–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, D. (2002). An analysis of the causes of recent banking crises. European Journal of Finance, 8, 152–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J., & O’ Hara, M. (2003). The corporate governance of banks. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 91–107.

  • Madura, J., & Zarruk, E. (1992). Information effects of loan portfolio quality on bank value. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 31, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, L. (2002). The German corporate governance code: What implications? Business Law Review, 140–145.

  • Miller, S., & Noulas, A. (1997). Portfolio mix and large-bank profitability in the USA. Applied Economics, 29(4), 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, P. (1993). Structure and performance in European banking. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wales, Bagnor.

  • Molyneux, P., & Thornton, J. (1992). Determinants of European bank profitability: A note. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16, 1173–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musumeci, J., & Sinkey, Jr., J. (1990). The international bank crisis and bank loan-loss reserve decisions: The signalling content of partially anticipated events. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 22, 370–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietsch, M. (2005). Corporate governance and company law reform: A German perspective. Corporate Governance, 13, 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noack, U., & Zetzsche, D. (2005). Corporate governance reform in Germany: The second decade. European Business Law Review, 1033–1064.

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (Ocrober 2004). OECD principles of corporate governance.

  • Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (1996). Interbank lending and systemic risk. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 26, 733–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. (1990). Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G., & Wörle, U. (2004). Die Unabhangigkeit des Aufsichtsrats – Recht Und Wirklichkeit. ZGR, 565–630.

  • Sadowski, D., Junkes, J., & Lindenthal, S. (1999). Labour co-determination and corporate governance in Germany: The economic impact of marginal symbolic rights. Quint-Essenzen Nr. 60.

  • Santos, J. (2001). Bank capital regulation in contemporary banking theory: A review of the literature. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 10, 41–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbracia, M., & Zaghini, A. (2003). The role of the banking system in the international transmission of shocks. The World Economy, 26(5), 727–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellenger, M., Wood, D., & Tashakori, A. (1989). Board of directors composition, shareholder wealth and dividend policy. Journal of Management, 15, 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (2003). Corporate governance in Germany: An economic perspective. Center for Financial Services Working Paper No. 36.

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., & Davidson, W. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 793–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirlock, M. (1985). Evidence on the (non) relationship between concentration and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 17, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, J., & Meyer, J. (1987). Asset write-downs: Managerial incentives and security returns. Journal of Finance, 42, 643–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakor, A. (1987). Discussion. Journal of Finance, 42, 661–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The High Level Group of Company Law Experts. (2002). Report on a modern regulatory framework for company law in Europe.

  • Thiel, M. (2001). [ECOFIN Economic Paper 158/2001]. Finance and economic growth: A review of theory and the available evidence.

  • Van Greuning, H., & Brajovic-Bratanovic, S. (2003). Analyzing and managing banking risk: A framework for assessing corporate governance and financial risk, second edition – No 20043, The World Bank.

  • Vance, S. (1968). The corporate director – a critical evaluation, Dow Jones-Irwin.

  • Wall, L. (1985). Why are some banks more profitable than others? Journal of Bank Research, 15, 240–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Gotshal and Manges (on behalf of the European Commission). (2002). [Final Report, 2002]. Comparative study of corporate governance codes relevant to the european union and its member states.

  • Weisbach, M. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1963). Managerial discretion and business behaviour. American Economic Review, 53, 1032–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, H. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & Pearce, J. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiotis K. Staikouras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staikouras, P.K., Staikouras, C.K. & Agoraki, ME.K. The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance. Eur J Law Econ 23, 1–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-007-9001-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-007-9001-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation