Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance studies

  • COMMENTARY
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parker LA, Gomez Saez N, Porta M, Hernandez-Aguado I, Lumbreras B. The impact of including different study designs in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013. Published online 2012 doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9756-9.

  2. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heistekamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282:1061–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van Rijn JC, Bossuyt PMM. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ. 2006;176:469–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    M. G. Myriam Hunink

  2. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    M. G. Myriam Hunink

Authors
  1. M. G. Myriam Hunink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. G. Myriam Hunink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myriam Hunink, M.G. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance studies. Eur J Epidemiol 28, 711–712 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9846-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9846-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation