Abstract
This study was designed to conduct genomic analysis in two steps, such as the overall relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis of the five virus species in the orthomyxoviridae family, and more intensive pattern analysis of the four subtypes of influenza A virus (H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, and H5N1) which were isolated from human population. All the subtypes were categorized by their isolated regions, including Asia, Europe, and Africa, and most of the synonymous codon usage patterns were analyzed by correspondence analysis (CA). As a result, influenza A virus showed the lowest synonymous codon usage bias among the virus species of the orthomyxoviridae family, and influenza B and influenza C virus were followed, while suggesting that influenza A virus might have an advantage in transmitting across the species barrier due to their low codon usage bias. The ENC values of the host-specific HA and NA genes represented their different HA and NA types very well, and this reveals that each influenza A virus subtype uses different codon usage patterns as well as the amino acid compositions. In NP, PA and PB2 genes, most of the virus subtypes showed similar RSCU patterns except for H5N1 and H3N2 (A/HK/1774/1999) subtypes which were suspected to be transmitted across the species barrier, from avian and porcine species to human beings, respectively. This distinguishable synonymous codon usage patterns in non-human origin viruses might be useful in determining the origin of influenza A viruses in genomic levels as well as the serological tests. In this study, all the process, including extracting sequences from GenBank flat file and calculating codon usage values, was conducted by Java codes, and these bioinformatics-related methods may be useful in predicting the evolutionary patterns of pandemic viruses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Puthavathana P, Auewarakul P, Charoenying PC, et al. 2005 Molecular characterization of the complete genome of human influenza H5N1 virus isolates from Thailand J General Virol 86: 423–433
Subbarao K, Shaw MW 2000 Molecular aspects of avian influenza (H5N1) viruses isolated from humans Rev Med Virol 10: 337–348
CDC News. 2005. Information about Avian Influenza (Bird Flu) and Avian Influenza A (H5N1) virus. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/facts.htm
Enserink M 2006 H5N1 moves into Africa, European Union, deepening global crisis. Science 311: 932
Lin YP, Shaw M, Gregory V, et al. 2000 Avian-to-human transmission of H9N2 subtype influenza A viruses: Relationship between H9N2 and H5N1 human isolates Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 9654–9658
Dimmock, NJ, Easton, AJ, Leppard KN 2002. Introduction to modern virology. pp. 297–311. Blackwell publishing, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148–5018, USA
Liu JP 2006 Avian influenza – a pandemic waiting to happen? J Microbiol Immunol Infect 39: 4–10
Voyles BJ 2002, The Biology of Viruses. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, USA, pp. 147–149, 338–341
Matrosovich M, Zhou N, Kawaoka Y, Webster R 1999 The surface glycoproteins of H5 influenza viruses isolated humans, chickens, and wild aquatic birds have distinguishable properties J Virol 73: 1146–1155
Plotkin JB, Dushoff J 2003 Codon bias and frequency-dependent selection on the hemagglutinin epitopes of influenza A virus Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 7152–7157
Rogers GN, Paulson JC 1983 Receptor determinants of human and animal influenza virus isolates: differences in receptor specificity of the H3 hemagglutinin based on species of origin Virology 127: 361–373
Duret L 2002 Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans Curr Opin Gene Dev 12: 640–649
Mclnerney JO 1998 Codon. Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 10698–10703
Moriyama EN, Hartl DL 1993 Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila Genetics. 134: 847–858
Lynn DJ, Singer GAC, Hickey DA 2002 Synonymous codon usage in subject to selection in thermophilic bacteria Nucleic Acids Res 30: 4272–4277
Shields DC, Sharp PM 1987 Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus stbtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases Nucleic Acids Res 15: 8023–8040
Stenico M, Lloyd AT, Sharp PM 1994 Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases Nucleic Acids Res 22: 2437–2446
Gu W, Zhou T, Ma J, Sun X, Lu Z 2004 Analysis of synonymous codon usage in SARS Coronavirus and other viruses in the Nidovirales Virus Res 101: 155–161
Jenkins GM, Holmes EC 2003 The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA viruses and its evolutionary origin. Virus Res 92: 1–7
Sharp PM, Li WH 1986 Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect for ‘rare’ codons Nucleic Acids Res 14: 7737–7749
Wright F 1990 The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene Gene 87: 23–29
Cary NC 2004. SAS ®R9.1.2 Qualification Tools User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc.
Johnson RA, Wichern DW Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc. 2002
Perrière G, Thioulouse J 2002 Use and misuse of correspondence analysis in codon usage studies Nucleic Acids Res 30: 4548–4555
Edler AA (2006) Avian flu (H5N1): its epidemiology, prevention, and implications for anaesthesiology J Clin Anesth 18: 1–4
Gregory V, Lim W, Cameron K, et al. 2001 Infection of a child in Hong Kong by influenza A h3n2 virus closely related to viruses circulating in European pigs J Gen Virol 82: 1397–1406
Eijk M, White MR, Batenburg JJ, et al. 2004 Interactions of influenza A virus with sialic acids present on porcine surfactant protein D Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 30: 871–879
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the contribution of all the experimentalists who made their invaluable data publicly available. This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 Project in 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahn, I., Jeong, BJ., Bae, SE. et al. Genomic Analysis of Influenza A Viruses, including Avian Flu (H5N1) Strains. Eur J Epidemiol 21, 511–519 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-9031-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-9031-z