Abstract
Patient organisations serve their members with information and support concerning a specific disease. In many cases they also contribute to research funding and lobby to improve the situation for their members. The larger group of patients an organisation claims to represent, the bigger their potential influence. Our hypothesis is that patient organiations exaggerate the number of persons affected with a specific disease. Prevalence figures from patient organisations in Sweden were collected via their own web sites. About 93 patient organisations were identified, 29 of which presented the estimates of disease occurrence used in this study. We calculated the probability for a person to have at least one disease and the proportion of the population not having any of the diseases listed. About 60% of the Swedish population have at least one disease covered by our sample of patient organisations. Nine tenths (87%) of the population would be ill if one assumes that an individual could only have one disease. Our rough estimates suggest that patient organisations exaggerate the number of ill persons. To render other messages on their agenda more trustworthy, we propose that some patient organisations moderate their prevalence and/or incidence figures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Available at www.infomedica.se. Accessed April 2005
Ross SM. A First Course in Probability. 5th edn. Prentice Hall. 200107
Swedish Radio, Channel P1, “Kaliber”. Broadcasted 2005-05-01 and available at http://www.sr.se/cgi-bin/P1/program/artikel.asp? ProgramID=1316&artikel= 601311
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ternhag, A., Asikainen, T. & Giesecke, J. Size Matters – Patient Organisations Exaggerate Prevalence Numbers. Eur J Epidemiol 20, 653–655 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-0705-8
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-0705-8