Abstract
Background:Conventionally, capture–recapture techniques involving different lists such as police or hospitals are used for quantifying populations which are difficult to count, such as illicit drug user populations. Here, a novel approach is suggested based upon repeated entries in one list, which is less dependent on matching entries from different sources as in the conventional approach. Methods: For this purpose, a population-based study was conducted that utilizes all data on treatment episodes of drug users from all 61 health treatment centers in the Bangkok metropolitan region to estimate the size of drug use in the Bangkok metropolitan region. The data stem from the drug treatment surveillance system of the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB) and cover the period from October 1 to December 31, 2001. Based upon the frequency of treatment episodes of each patient, a count distribution arose which could be modelled well by means of a Poisson mixture model. Using this count model, an estimate for the number of unobserved drug users could be constructed. Results: From 11,222 drug users found during the period, 7063 (62.9) were heroin users, 3346 (29.8) metamphetamine users, and the remaining 813 (7.3) distributed under 15 drug categories, none above 1. The study concentrated on heroin and metamphetamine users who were predominantly male (96.2 for heroin and 91.8 for metamphetamine). Metamphetamine users were younger than heroin users (22.3 years 95 CI: 22.1–22.5 vs. 30.8 years 95 CI: 30.6–31.0). By using the truncated Poisson mixture model, an estimate of the unobserved frequency of drug users with zero treatment episodes could be constructed leading to an estimate of 11,296 (95 CI: 8,964–13,628) heroin users (completeness of identification: 38.42, 95 CI: 34.03–44.04) and 32,105 (95 CI: 24,647–39,563) metamphetamine users (completeness of identification: 9.44, 95 CI: 7.79–11.97) for the Bangkok metropolitan region. Conclusions: The proposed model showed excellent goodness-of-fit, unspecified for drug type and also if specified for the major drug types which allowed the prediction of the unobserved number of drug users in a realistic way, avoiding artefacts due to severe matching problems when using several, different sources. The technique is also easy to implement and can be used routinely to monitor drug user populations in space and time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
EB Hook R Regal (1995) ArticleTitleCapture–recapture methods in epidemiology: Methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev 17 243–264 Occurrence Handle8654510 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283mtFeiug%3D%3D
InstitutionalAuthorNameInternational Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting (1995) ArticleTitleCapture–recapture and multiple record systems estimation I. History and theoretical development. Am J Epidemiol 142 1047–1058
International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting. Capture–recapture and multiple record systems estimation II. Applications in human diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 1059–1068.
AG Davies RM Cormack AM Richardson (1999) ArticleTitleEstimation of injecting drug users in the City of Edinburgh, Scotland, and number infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Int J Epidemiol 28 117–121 Occurrence Handle10.1093/ije/28.1.117 Occurrence Handle10195675 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3htVSmsg%3D%3D
A Domingo-Salvany RL Hartnoll A Maguire et al. (1998) ArticleTitleAnalytic considerations in the use of capture–recapture to estimate prevalence: Case studies of the estimation of opiate use in the metropolitan area of Barcelona, Spain. Am J Epidemiol 148 732–749 Occurrence Handle9786228 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FgtVWltQ%3D%3D
MCA Buster Bussel GHA van den Brink W van (2001) ArticleTitleEstimating the number of opiate users in Amsterdam by capture–recapture: The importance of case definition. Eur J Epidemiol 17 935–942 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016256929862 Occurrence Handle12188014 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjtFOgsQ%3D%3D
G Hay (2000) ArticleTitleCapture–recapture estimates of drug misuse in urban and nonurban settings in the north east of Scotland. Addiction 95 1795–1803 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.951217959.x Occurrence Handle11177495 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7jsFOmsQ%3D%3D
CM Comiskey JM Barry (2001) ArticleTitleA capture–recapture study of the prevalence and implications of opiate use in Dublin. Eur J Public Health 11 198–200 Occurrence Handle10.1093/eurpub/11.2.198 Occurrence Handle11420811 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FhsVOltw%3D%3D
TD Mastro D Kitayaporn BG Weniger et al. (1994) ArticleTitleEstimating the number of HIV-infected injection drug users in Bangkok: A capture–recapture method. Am J Public Health 84 1094–1099 Occurrence Handle8017531 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ovVWltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.2105/AJPH.84.7.1094
YMM Bishop SE Fienberg PW Holland (1975) Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice MIT Press Cambridge, MA 229–256
K. Tilling (2001) ArticleTitleCapture–recapture methods–useful or misleading? Int J Epidemiol 30 12–14 Occurrence Handle11171841 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvgvVGhtg%3D%3D
CJ Chapman (1951) ArticleTitleSome properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoological censuses. U California Public Stat 1 131–160
JA Razzak SP Luby (1998) ArticleTitleEstimating deaths and injuries due to road traffic accidents in Karachi, Pakistan, through the capture–recapture method. Int J Epidemiol 27 866–870 Occurrence Handle10.1093/ije/27.5.866 Occurrence Handle9839745 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FltlCrsg%3D%3D
JT Grogger RT Carson (1991) ArticleTitleModels for truncated counts. J Appl Economet 6 225–238
RM Dorazio JA Royle (2003) ArticleTitleMixture models for estimating the size of a closed population when capture rates vary among individuals. Biometrics 59 351–364 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1541-0420.00042 Occurrence Handle12926720
X-L Meng (1997) ArticleTitleThe EM algorithm and medical studies: A␣historical linik. SMMR 6 3–23 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szivVOksA%3D%3D
WD Hall JE Ross MT Lynskey et al. (2000) ArticleTitleHow many dependent heroin users are there in Australia? MJA 173 528–531 Occurrence Handle11194736 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gtVeqtg%3D%3D
G Hay F Smit (2003) ArticleTitleEstimating the number of drug injectors from needle exchange data. Addiction Res Theory 11 235–243
YI Hser (1993) ArticleTitlePopulation estimation of illicit drug users in Los Angeles County. J Drug Issues 23 323–334
A Domingo-Salvany RL Hartnoll A Maguire JM Suelves Antó (1995) ArticleTitleUse of capture–recapture to estimate the prevalence of opiate addiction in Barcelona, Spain, 1989. Am J Epidemiol 141 567–574 Occurrence Handle7900724 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M3gvVKluw%3D%3D
D Zelterman (1988) ArticleTitleRobust estimation in truncated discrete distributions with application to capture–recapture experiments. J Stat Plann Inf 18 225–237 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0378-3758(88)90007-9
CX Mao BG Lindsay (2002) ArticleTitleA Poisson model for the coverage problem with a genomic application. Biometrika 89 669–681 Occurrence Handle10.1093/biomet/89.3.669
TD Wickens (1993) ArticleTitleQuantitative methods for estimating the size of a drugusing population. J Drug Issues 23 185–216
DK Rossmo R Routledge (1990) ArticleTitleEstimating the size of a criminal population. J Quant Criminol 6 293–314
AP Dempster NM Laird DB Rubin (1977) ArticleTitleMaximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J R Stat Soc [B] 39 1–38
D. Böhning (2000) Computer-assisted analysis of mixtures and applications Meta-analysis, disease mapping and others Chapman & Hall/CRC Boca Raton
NM Laird (1978) ArticleTitleNonparametric maximum likelihood estimation of a mixing distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 73 805–811
D Böhning E Dietz P Schlattmann (1998) ArticleTitleRecent developments in computer-assisted analysis of mixtures. Biometrics 54 367–377
Suppawattanabodee B. Estimating the number of drug users in Bangkok: A capture–recapture method. Master Thesis in Biostatistics, Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 2003.
EB Hook RR Regal (1982) ArticleTitleThe validity of Bernoulli census, log-linear, and truncated binomial models for correcting for underestimation in prevalence studies. Am J Epidemiol 116 168–176 Occurrence Handle6213145 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL383ltlyisg%3D%3D
D Collet (1999) Modelling binary data. Chapman & Hall/CRC Boca Raton
L Simar (1976) ArticleTitleMaximum likelihood estimation of a compound Poisson process. Ann Stat 4 1200–1209
C Debrock P-M Preux D Houinato et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEstimation of the prevalence of epilepsy in the Benin region of Zinvië using the capture–recapture method. Int J Epidemiol 29 330–335 Occurrence Handle10.1093/ije/29.2.330 Occurrence Handle10817133 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3nsVygtg%3D%3D
DK Pal T Das S Sengupta (1998) ArticleTitleComparison of key informant and survey methods for ascertainment of childhood epilepsy in West Bengal, India. Int J Epidemiol 27 672–676 Occurrence Handle10.1093/ije/27.4.672 Occurrence Handle9758124 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvivFSqsw%3D%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Böhning, D., Suppawattanabodee, B., Kusolvisitkul, W. et al. Estimating the number of drug users in Bangkok 2001: A capture–recapture approach using repeated entries in one list. Eur J Epidemiol 19, 1075–1083 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-004-3006-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-004-3006-8