Skip to main content
Log in

Self-similarity and scale effects in physical modelling of hydraulic jump roller dynamics, air entrainment and turbulent scales

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A physical study of hydraulic jump is often undertaken using down-scaled Froude-similar models with Reynolds numbers much smaller than in prototype (e.g. spillway stilling basins). The potential viscous scale effects may affect a number of physical processes including turbulence development and air entrainment, thus challenging the extrapolation of laboratory data to the prediction of prototype conditions or justification of numerical modelling. This paper presents an experimental study of hydraulic jumps with a particular focus on the scale effects in terms of free-surface fluctuation and deformation, bubble advection and diffusion, bubble-turbulence interaction and turbulence dissipation. A broad range of free-surface, air–water flow and turbulence properties were measured systematically for Froude numbers from 3.8 to 10 and Reynolds numbers from 2.1 × 104 to 1.6 × 105. Based upon self-similarities in the longitudinal evolution of a number of characteristic flow properties, the analytical expressions of time-averaged roller surface profile, void fraction distribution and longitudinal velocity distribution were derived for given Froude number. The roller surface dynamics were found free of scale effects in terms of fluctuation amplitudes but the characteristic frequencies were scale-sensitive. While some air–water flow parameters such as bubble count rate, bubble chord time distribution and bubble grouping behaviour could only be correctly quantified at full-scale prototype conditions, the aeration level and turbulent scales might be estimated with satisfactory accuracy for engineering applications given a model Reynolds number no less than 4 × 10 to 6 × 104.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barenblatt GI (1996) Scaling, self-similarity, and intermediate asymptotics. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bélanger JB (1841) Notes sur l’hydraulique (Notes on hydraulic engineering). Ecole Royale des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bidone G (1819) Le remou et sur la propagation des ondes (The jump and on the wave propagation). Rep R Acad Sci Turin 12:21–112 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bin AK (1993) Gas entrainment by plunging liquid jets. Chem Eng Sci 48(21):3585–3630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brattberg T, Chanson H (1998) Air entrainment and air bubble dispersion at two-dimensional plunging water jets. Chem Eng Sci 53(24):4113–4127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brattberg T, Chanson H, Toombes L (1998) Experimental investigations of free-surface aeration in the developing flow of two-dimensional water jets. J Fluid Eng 120(4):738–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cain P, Wood IR (1981) Measurements of self-aerated flow on spillways. J Hydraul Division 107(HY11):1425–1444

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chachereau Y, Chanson H (2011) Bubbly flow measurements in hydraulic jumps with small inflow Froude numbers. Int J Multiph Flow 37(6):555–564. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chanson H (2010) Convective transport of air bubbles in strong hydraulic jumps. Int J Multiph Flow 36(10):798–814. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2010.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chanson H, Chachereau Y (2013) Scale effects affecting two-phase flow properties in hydraulic jump with small inflow Froude number. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 45:234–242. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chanson H, Gualtieri C (2008) Similitude and scale effects of air entrainment in hydraulic jumps. J Hydraul Res 46(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chanson H, Toombes L (2002) Air-water flows down stepped chutes: turbulence and flow structure observations. Int J Multiph Flow 28(11):1737–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coakley DB, Haldeman PM, Morgan DG, Nicolas KR, Penndorf DR, Wetzel LB, Weller CS (2001) Electromagnetic scattering from large steady breaking waves. Exp Fluids 30:479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hager WH (1992) Energy dissipators and hydraulic jump. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson FM (1966) Open channel flow. MacMillan Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoyt JW, Sellin RHJ (1989) Hydraulic jump as ‘mixing layer’. J Hydraul Eng 40(3):1607–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kucukali S, Chanson H (2008) Turbulence measurements in hydraulic jumps with partially-developed inflow conditions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 33(1):41–53. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liggett JA (1994) Fluid mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lighthill J (1978) Waves in fluid. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin C, Hsieh S, Lin I, Chang K, Raikar R (2012) Flow property and self-similarity in steady hydraulic jumps. Exp Fluids 53:1591–1616. doi:10.1007/s00348-012-1377-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu M, Rajaratnam N, Zhu D (2004) Turbulent structure of hydraulic jumps of low Froude numbers. J Hydraul Eng 130(6):511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Long D, Rajaratnam N, Steffler PM, Smy PR (1991) Structure of flow in hydraulic jumps. J Hydraul Res 29(2):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Montes SJ (1998) Hydraulics of open channel flow. ASCE Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murzyn F, Chanson H (2008) Experimental assessment of scale effects affecting two-phase flow properties in hydraulic jumps. Exp Fluids 45(3):513–521. doi:10.1007/s00348-008-0494-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murzyn F, Chanson H (2009) Experimental investigation of bubbly flow and turbulence in hydraulic jumps. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):143–159. doi:10.1007/s10652-008-9077-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murzyn F, Mouaze D, Chaplin JR (2005) Optical fibre probe measurements of bubbly flow in hydraulic jumps. Int J Multiph Flow 31(1):141–154. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2004.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Murzyn F, Mouaze D, Chaplin JR (2007) Air-water interface dynamic and free surface features in hydraulic jumps. J Hydraul Res 45(5):679–685. doi:10.1080/00221686.2007.9521804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prosperetti A, Tryggvason G (2009) Computational methods for multiphase flow. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rajaratnam N (1962) An experimental study of air entrainment characteristics of the hydraulic jump. J Instr Eng India 42(7):247–273

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rajaratnam N (1965) The hydraulic jump as a wall jet. J Hydraul Div 91(HY5):107–132

    Google Scholar 

  31. Resch FJ, Leutheusser HJ (1972) Le ressaut hydraulique: mesures de turbulence dans la région diphasique (The hydraulic jump: turbulence measurements in the two-phase flow region). La Houille Blanche 4:279–293 (in French)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Richard GL, Gavrilyuk SL (2013) The classical hydraulic jump in a model of shear shallow-water flows. J Fluid Mech 725:492–521. doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Subramanya K (2009) Flow in open channels. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  34. Svendsen IA, Veeramony J, Bakunin J, Kirby JT (2000) The flow in weak turbulent hydraulic jumps. J Fluid Mech 418:25–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang H (2014) Turbulence and air entrainment in hydraulic jumps. PhD thesis. School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. doi: 10.14264/uql.2014.542

  36. Wang H, Felder S, Chanson H (2014) An experimental study of turbulent two-phase flow in hydraulic jumps and application of a triple decomposition technique. Exp Fluids 55(7):1775. doi:10.1007/s00348-014-1775-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wood IR (1991) Air entrainment in free-surface flows. IAHR Hydraulic Structures Design Manual No. 4, Hydraulic Design Considerations. Balkema Publisher, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jason Van Der Gevel and Stewart Matthews, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland for their technical assistance. The post-processing of phase-detection probe signal was facilitated by the software developed by Dr Stefan Felder (University of New South Wales). The research project was supported by the Australian Research Council (Grant DP120100481). The first author acknowledges the advisory input of Dr Frédéric Murzyn (ESTACA Laval, France) during his Ph.D. thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Chanson, H. Self-similarity and scale effects in physical modelling of hydraulic jump roller dynamics, air entrainment and turbulent scales. Environ Fluid Mech 16, 1087–1110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9466-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9466-z

Keywords

Navigation