Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental study of wave dynamics in coastal wetlands

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents laboratory experiments of wave-driven hydrodynamics in a three-dimensional laboratory model of constructed coastal wetlands. The simulated wetland plants were placed on the tops of conically-shaped mounds, such that the laboratory model was dynamically similar to marsh mounds constructed in Dalehite Cove in Galveston Bay, Texas. Three marsh mounds were placed in the three-dimensional wave basin of the Haynes Coastal Engineering Laboratory at Texas A&M University, with the center of the central wetland mound located in the center of the tank along a plane of symmetry in the alongshore direction. The experiments included two water depths, corresponding to emergent and submerged vegetation, and four wave conditions, typical of wind-driven waves and ocean swell. The wave conditions were designed so that the waves would break on the offshore slope of the wetland mounds, sending a strong swash current through the vegetated patches. Three different spacings between the wetland mounds were tested. To understand the effects of vegetation, all experiments were repeated with and without simulated plants. Measurements were made throughout the nearshore region surrounding the wetland mounds using a dense array of acoustic Doppler velocimeters and capacitance wave gauges. These data were analyzed to quantify the significant wave height, phase average wave field and phase lags, wave energy dissipation over the vegetated patches, mean surface water levels, and the near-bottom current field. The significant wave height and energy dissipation results demonstrated that the bathymetry is the dominant mechanism for wave attenuation for this design. The presence of plants primarily increases the rate of wave attenuation through the vegetation and causes a blockage effect on flow through the vegetation. The nearshore circulation is most evident in the water level and velocity data. In the narrowest mound spacing, flow is obstructed in the channel between mounds by the mound slope and forced over the wetlands. The close mound spacing also retains water in the nearshore, resulting in a large setup and lower flows through the channel. As the spacing increases, flow is less obstructed in the channel. This allows for more refraction of waves off the mounds and deflection of flow around the plant patches, yielding higher recirculating flow through the channel between mounds. An optimal balance of unobstructed flow in the channel, wave dissipation over the mounds, and modest setup in the nearshore results when the edge-to-edge plant spacing is equal to the mound base diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asano T (2006) Wave attenuation and sediment deposition due to coastal vegetation. J Glob Environ Eng 11:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asano T, Matsumoto S, Kikuchu S (2005) Wave deformation in vegetation fringed channels. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on coastal engineering, Lisbon, vol. 1, pp 218–229.

  3. Augustin LN, Irish JL, Lynett P (2009) Laboratory and numerical studies of wave damping by emergent and near-emergent wetland vegetation. Coast Eng 56:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalrymple RA, Kirby JT, Hwang PA (1984) Wave diffraction due to areas of energy dissipation. J Wtrwy Port Coast Oc Engrg 110(1):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Errico J (2004) inpaint nans.m: Interpolate NaN elements in a 2D array using non-NaN elements. MATLAB Central File Exchange. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/4551 Accessed 19 April 2011

  6. Dean GD, Dalrymple RA (1984) Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  7. Folkard AM (2005) Hydrodynamics of model Posidonia Oceanica patches in shallow water. Limnol Oceanogr 50(5):1592–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goring D, Nikora V (2002) Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J Hydraul Eng 128(1):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LaSalle MW, Landin MC, Sims JG (1991) Evaluation of the flora and fauna of a Spartina Alterniflora marsh established on dredged material in Winyah Bay, South Carolina. Wetlands 11(2):191–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Loder NM, Irish JL, Cialone MA, Wamsley TV (2009) Sensitivity of hurricane surge to morphological parameters of coastal wetlands. Estuar Coast Shelf S 84:625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendez FJ, Losada IJ (2004) An empirical model to estimate the propagation of random breaking and nonbreaking waves over vegetation fields. Coast Eng 51:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Minello TJ (2000) Temporal development of salt marsh value for nekton and epifauna: utilization of dredged material marshes in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minello TJ, Webb JW Jr (1997) Use of natural and created Spartina Alterniflora salt marshes by fishery species and other aquatic fauna in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 151:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mori N (2006) Despike package: 3D phase-space method. MACE Toolbox for Coastal Engineers. http://www.oceanwave.jp/softwares/mace/index.php?MACE%20Softwares. Accessed 5 Nov 2010

  15. Mori N, Suzuki T, Kakuno S (2007) Noise of acoustic Doppler velocimeter data in bubbly flow. J Eng Mech-ASCE 133(1):122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nepf HM (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35(2):479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nepf HM (2004) Vegetated flow dynamics. In: Fagherazzi S, Marani M, Blum LK (eds) The ecogeomorphology of tidal marshes. American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C., pp 137–163

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noarayanan L, Murali K, Sundar V (2012) Performance of flexible emergent vegetation in staggered configuration as a mitigation measure for extreme coastal disasters. Nat Hazards 62:531–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ravens TM, Thomas RC, Roberts KA, Santschi PH (2009) Causes of salt marsh erosion in Galveston Bay, Texas. J Coast Res 25(2):265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shafer DJ, Streever WJ (2000) A comparison of 28 natural and dredged material salt marshes in Texas with an emphasis on geomorphological variables. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shafer DJ, Roland R, Douglass SL (2003) Preliminary evaluation of critical wave energy thresholds at natural and created coastal wetlands. WRP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN- WRP-HS-CP-2.2). Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/hscp2-2. Accessed 25 June 2012

  22. Streever WJ (2000) Spartina Alterniflora marshes on dredged material: a critical review of the ongoing debate over success. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:295–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wamsley TV, Cialone MA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Rosati JD (2010) The potential of wetlands in reducing storm surge. Ocean Eng 37:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. White BL, Nepf HM (2007) Shear instability and coherent structures in shallow flow adjacent to a porous layer. J Fluid Mech 593:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamagishi M, Togano T, Tashiro S (2007) Phase averaging analysis of the unsteady velocity profiles in the separation flow on the flat plate. J Environ Eng 2(4):667–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Publication supported in part by an Institutional Grant (NA14OAR4170102) to the Texas Sea Grant College Program from the National Sea Grant Office, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. In addition, the authors would like to thank Mr. John Reed and Dr. Po-H. Yeh for their technical guidance and the sharing of their experience in the Haynes Coastal Engineering Laboratory. Special thanks are also given to Mr. David Dailey and Ms. Kristie Drawe, student workers in the research group, and also Mr. Paul Ramsey, Mr. Christopher Ryan and Mr. Eric Sonne, student workers at the Haynes Laboratory, for their help and input during the laboratory experiments. All experimental data used in preparation of this paper are available from authors KAW or SAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerri A. Whilden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Truong, M.K., Whilden, K.A., Socolofsky, S.A. et al. Experimental study of wave dynamics in coastal wetlands. Environ Fluid Mech 15, 851–880 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9384-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9384-x

Keywords

Navigation