Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Concentration fluctuations in a downtown urban area. Part II: analysis of Joint Urban 2003 wind-tunnel measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of concentration time series measured in a boundary-layer wind tunnel at the University of Hamburg is presented. The measurements were conducted with a detailed aerodynamic model of the Oklahoma City (OKC) central business district (CBD) at the scale of 1:300 and were part of the Joint Urban 2003 (JU2003) project. Concentration statistics, as well as concentration probability density (PDF) and exceedance probability (EDF) functions were computed for street- and roof-level sites for three different wind directions. Taking into account the different length scales and wind speeds in the wind-tunnel (WT) and full-scale experiments, dimensionless concentrations and a dimensionless time scale are computed for the comparison with data from the JU2003 full-scale tracer experiments, conducted in OKC in 2003. Using such dimensionless time, the WT time series cover a ~20 times longer time span than the JU2003 full-scale time series, which are analysed in detail in an accompanying, first part of this paper. The WT time series are thus divided into 20 consecutive blocks of equal length and the statistical significance of parameters based on relatively short records is assessed by studying the variability of the concentration statistics and probability functions for the different blocks. In particular at sites closer to the plume edge, the results for the individual blocks vary significantly and at such sites statistics from short records are not very representative. While the location of three sampling sites in the WT closely matched the sites during the full-scale experiments, the prevailing wind directions during the JU2003 releases were not exactly matched. The comparison between full-scale and WT concentration parameters should thus primarily be interpreted in a qualitative rather than direct quantitative sense. Given the differences in mean wind directions and concerns about the representativeness of full-scale concentration statistics, the WT and full-scale results compared well. The 98 percentile concentrations for almost all full-scale releases analyzed are within the scatter of the percentiles observed in the block analysis of the WT time series. Furthermore, the concentration percentiles appear linearly correlated with the fluctuation intensities and the linear relationships determined in the wind tunnel agree well with full-scale results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klein P, Young D (2010) Concentration fluctuations in a downtown urban area—part I: analysis of joint urban 2003 full-scale fast-response measurements. Environ Fluid Mech doi:10.1007/s10652-010-9194-8

  2. Schatzmann M, Leit B (2009) Evaluation of numerical flow and dispersion models for applications in industrial and urban areas. Chem Eng Technol 32(2): 241–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schatzmann M, Leitl B (2002) Validation and application of obstacle-resolving urban dispersion models. Atmos Environ 36(30): 4811–4821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanda M (2006) Progress in the scale modeling of urban climate: review. Theor Appl Climatol 84: 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robins A (2003) Wind tunnel dispersion modelling some recent and not so recent achievements. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91: 1777–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robins A, Castro IP (1977) Wind-tunnel investigation of plume dispersion in vicinity of a surface mounted cube: 2 concentration field. Atmos Environ 11: 299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kastner-Klein P, Plate E, Fedorovich E (1997) Gaseous pollulant dispersion around urban-canopy elements: wind tunnel case studies. Int J Environ Pollut 8: 727–737

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mavroidis I et al (2003) Field and wind tunnel investigations of plume dispersion around single surface obstacles. Atmos Environ 37(21): 2903–2918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mavroidis I et al (2007) Atmospheric dispersion in the presence of a three-dimensional cubical obstacle: modelling of mean concentration and concentration fluctuations. Atmos Environ 41(13): 2740–2756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson MJ et al (1996) Wind tunnel simulations of plume dispersion through groups of obstacles. Atmos Environ 30(22): 3715–3731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDonald RW et al (1998) A comparison of results from scaled field and wind tunnel modelling of dispersion in arrays of obstacles. Atmos Environ 32(22): 3845–3862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mavroidis I, Griffiths RF (2001) Local characteristics of atmospheric dispersion within building arrays. Atmos Environ 35(16): 2941–2954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gailis RM, Hill A (2006) A wind-tunnel simulation of plume dispersion within a large array of obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119(2): 289–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yee E et al (2006) Comparison of wind-tunnel and water-channel simulations of plume dispersion through a large array of obstacles with a scaled field experiment. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121(3): 389–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pavageau M, Schatzmann M (1999) Wind tunnel measurements of concentration fluctuations in an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 33(24-25): 3961–3971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kastner-Klein P, Plate EJ (1999) Wind-tunnel study of concentration fields in street canyons. Atmos Environ 33: 3973–3979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kastner-Klein P, Berkowicz R, Britter R (2004) The influence of street architecture on flow and dispersion in street canyons. Meteorol Atmos Phys 87: 121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, McNamara KF (2007) Effects of street orientation on dispersion at or near urban street intersections. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95: 1526–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein P, Leitl B, Schatzmann M (2007) Driving physical mechanisms of flow and dispersion in urban canopies. Int J Climatol 27: 1887–1907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pascheke F et al (2008) Wind-tunnel modelling of dispersion from a scalar area source in urban-like roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126(1): 103–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bächlin W et al (1991) Wind field and dispersion in a built-up area—a comaprison between field measurments and wind-tunnel data. Atmos Environ 25(7): 1135–1142

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yassin MF et al (2005) Field and wind-tunnel study of pollutant dispersion in a built-up area under various meteorological conditions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93(5): 361–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Allwine KJ (2004) Overview of JOINT URBAN 2003—an atmospheric dispersion study in Oklahoma City. In: AMS symposium on planning, nowcasting, and forecasting in the urban zone, Seattle, WA, Jan 11–15, paper J7.1. http://ams.confex.com/ams/84Annual/techprogram/paper_71468.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2009

  24. Allwine KJ, Flaherty JE (2004) Joint Urban 2003: study overview and instrument locations. Report PNNL-15967, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under a Related Services Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. Available to the public via online ordering from http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm

  25. Clawson KL, Carter RG, Lacroix DJ et al (2005) Joint Urban 2003 (JU03) SF6 atmospheric tracer field tests. NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR ARL-254

  26. Leitl B, Pascheke F, Schatzmann M (2003) Generation of wind tunnel data sets in support of the Joint Urban 2003 atmospheric dispersion study, Oklahoma City, July 2003, Final Report Phase I 08-2003, Meteorological Institute, Hamburg University, Bundesstrasse 55, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. https://www.ju2003-slc.org/

  27. Kastner-Klein P, Leitl B, Pascheke F, Schatzmann M (2004) Wind-tunnel simulation of the JOINT Urban 2003 tracer experiment. In: AMS symposium on planning, nowcasting, and forecasting in the urban zone, Seattle, WA, Jan 11–15, paper 5.4. http://ams.confex.com/ams/84Annual/techprogram/paper_73272.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2009

  28. Leitl B, Schatzmann M (2005) Generation of wind tunnel data sets in support of the Joint Urban 2003 atmospheric dispersion study, Oklahoma City, July 2003, Final Report Phase II 07-2005, Meteorological Institute, Hamburg University, Bundesstrasse 55, 20146 Hamburg, Germany

  29. Cheuk ML, Yuan M, Kastner-Klein P (2006) Coupling Geographic information systems and urban dispersion model: an example of ArcGIS and QUIC. In: Sixth urban environment symposium, annual meeting of the American Meteorological Society, 29 January–2 February, 2006, Atlanta, GA

  30. Pascheke F (2000) Analyse zeitlich hochaufgeloester Windmessungen in einer staedtischen Grenzschicht und Reproduktion wesentlicher Turbulenzeigenschaften im Grenzschichtwindkanal. Diploma Thesis, Meteorological Institute at Hamburg University, November 2000.

  31. Yee E, Chan R (1997) A simple model for the probability density function of concentration fluctuations in atmospheric plumes. Atmos Environ 31(7): 991–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yee E (2009) Probability law of concentration in plumes dispersing in an urban area. Environ Fluid Mech 9(4): 389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanna SR (1984) The exponential probability density function and concentration fluctuations in smoke plumes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 29: 361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lewellen WS, Sykes RI (1986) Analysis of concentration fluctuations from LIDAR observations of atmospheric plumes. J Clim Appl Meteorol 25(8): 1145–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mylne KR, Mason PJ (1991) Concentration fluctuation measurements in a dispersing plume at a range of up to 1000 m. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 117(497): 177–206

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mylne KR (1993) The vertical profiles of concentration fluctuations in near-surface plumes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 65(1–2): 111–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chatwin PC, Sullivan PJ (1989) The intermittency factor of scalars in turbulence. Phys Fluids A 1(4): 761–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK, 73072, USA

    P. Klein

  2. Meteorological Institute, EWTL, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    B. Leitl & M. Schatzmann

Authors
  1. P. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Leitl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Schatzmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Klein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, P., Leitl, B. & Schatzmann, M. Concentration fluctuations in a downtown urban area. Part II: analysis of Joint Urban 2003 wind-tunnel measurements. Environ Fluid Mech 11, 43–60 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9195-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9195-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation