Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation and inference for upper hinge regression models

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce a new type of threshold regression models called upper hinge models. Under this type of threshold models, there only exists an association between the predictor of interest and the outcome when the predictor is less than some threshold value. Just like hinge models, upper hinge models can be seen as a special case of the more general segmented or two-phase regression models. The importance of studying upper hinge models is that even though they only have one fewer degree of freedom than segmented models, they can be estimated with much greater efficiency. We develop a new fast grid search algorithm to estimate upper hinge linear regression models. The new algorithm reduces the computational complexity of the search algorithm dramatically and renders the existing fast grid search algorithm inadmissible. The fast grid search algorithm makes it feasible to construct bootstrap confidence intervals for upper hinge linear regression models; for upper hinge generalized linear models of non-Gaussian family, we derive asymptotic normality to facilitate construction of model-robust confidence intervals. We perform numerical experiments and illustrate the proposed methods with two real data examples from the ecology literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee M, McKeague IW (2007) Confidence sets for split points in decision trees. Ann Stat 35(2):543–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong Y (2018) Fast bootstrap confidence intervals for continuous threshold linear regression. J Comput Graph Stat, p 1–16 (in press)

  • Fong Y, Huang Y, Gilbert P, Permar S (2017) chngpt: threshold regression model estimation and inference. BMC Bioinform 18(1):454–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gause GF et al (1934) Experimental analysis of vito volterra’s mathematical theory of the struggle for existence. Science 79(2036):16–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (2017) Regression kink with an unknown threshold. J Bus Econ Stat 35(2):228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkley DV (1971) Inference in two-phase regression. J Am Stat Assoc 66(336):736–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan M (2008) Updating inverse of a matrix when a column is added/removed. Technical report, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

  • McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Taylor & Francis, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muggeo V (2003) Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat Med 22(19):3055–3071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal D (2003) Introduction to population biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor R, Guallar E (1998) Use of two-segmented logistic regression to estimate change-points in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 148(7):631–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor-Barriuso R, Guallar E, Coresh J (2003) Transition models for change-point estimation in logistic regression. Stat Med 22(7):1141–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooch A, Zelo I, Fried R (2019) Estimation methods for the lrd parameter under a change in the mean. Stat Pap 60(1):313–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki T, Okayasu T, Jamsran U, Takeuchi K (2008) Threshold changes in vegetation along a grazing gradient in mongolian rangelands. J Ecol 96(1):145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnurr A, Dehling H (2017) Testing for structural breaks via ordinal pattern dependence. J Am Stat Assoc 112(518):706–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GA, Wild CJ (2003) Nonlinear regression. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer HR, Chapman PL, Sillett TS, Ghalambor CK (2013) Advantages of nonlinear mixed models for fitting avian growth curves. J Avian Biol 44(5):469–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne SH, Williams HD (1999) Cell density-dependent starvation survival of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli: identification of the role of an n-acyl homoserine lactone in adaptation to stationary-phase survival. J Bacteriol 181(3):981–990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Editor, the AE and two referees for their constructive comments. We are also indebted to Dr. Helen Sofaer of the US Geological Survey for suggesting the paramecium population growth dataset, to Dr. Takehiro Sasaki of Yokohama National University, Japan for providing the Mongolian rangelands vegetation dataset, and to Lindsay N. Carpp for help with editing. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01-AI122991; UM1-AI068635).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youyi Fong.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Pierre Dutilleul.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 208 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elder, A., Fong, Y. Estimation and inference for upper hinge regression models. Environ Ecol Stat 26, 287–302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-019-00428-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-019-00428-1

Keywords

Navigation